How Many Carry a 1911 with FMJ Ammo?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Stopped is stopped. Down is down. Dead is dead. Jeff Cooper praised the .45ACP Hardball for its stopping power. This power was due to the bullet diameter and weight. He had the same opinion of the .44 Special for the same reason, but preferred the 1911 platform over a revolver for its extra capacity and ease of reloading. Then he started IPSC with its major and minor calibers and the race was on to make smaller calibers as effective as the larger ones. The ammo companies saw a marketing opportunity and soon we had light weight JHPs in .357, .38+P, and 9mm claiming to expand to the diameter of a .45 hardball and thus deliver the same or better stopping power. Well, can't have those pipsqueaks challenging the almighty .45 so whats good for the goose is good for the gander, and here came the .45ACP JHPs. By golly, we'll show them. Now lets see the .38s expand to .50 or .60. And so it goes.

But what did not change is the fact that the .45ACP Hardball still delivers the same stopping power it did when it was declared the premier SD round and, since homo sapiens has not evidenced significant evolutionary change in the last 100 years, the .45 caliber still performs the same way as it did in the Thompson-Legarde tests 100 years ago, which lead to the US Army adopting it. It will do the job and stop the fight and do it reliably. So will a .45 JHP, JFN, or LTC.

Security is a state of mind, so carry what makes you feel most secure. If you are more secure believing you are making a bigger hole, fine. If you are more secure believing the bullet is going to come out of the barrel every time, fine. The BG that gets shot won't care. Stopped is stopped, Down is down, Dead is dead.

-jrh

(BTW: .45ACP 230gr FMJ; 9mm 124gr JHP; .380 95 gr FMJ. FWIW)
 
Lee Jurras got the ball rolling on light, fast JHP ammunition with his "Supervel" brand. IIRC, his first excursion was 110-grain .38 Special, followed shortly after by 185-grain .45 ACP. JHP bullet technology was a bit lacking, and the bullets didn't perform all that well...but the stage was set.

Remember also that Cooper's personal experience with .45 hardball's stopping power was limited to three starving, exhausted Japanese soldiers that he shot at close range. He may have witnessed others, but those were the ones that he always mentioned. Hardball may not do quite as well against a 250-pounder who spent the last 10 years pumping iron in the prison yard. Of course, under those circumstances, a hollowpoint may not do a lot better...which is why we shoot until he's down or until the slide locks.
 
Wait.. Supervel is a ... thing?

I used to buy them ammo from Jurras....

I still have cases of the stuff. Mostly his "seconds". The boxes are yellow and red.

And a barrel of ... weird items.

Backwards bullets, strange wadcutters, solid copper bullets...

I dont shoot it much, it seem VERY VERY hot...and I worry about the quality of it.

I thought he was just local guy, ammo loader.

I gotta look into this.
 
Lee Jurras got the ball rolling on light, fast JHP ammunition with his "Supervel" brand. IIRC, his first excursion was 110-grain .38 Special, followed shortly after by 185-grain .45 ACP. JHP bullet technology was a bit lacking, and the bullets didn't perform all that well...but the stage was set.

I think there was also a 125 grain .357 in there as well. It has been a progression. Elmer Keith started the magnum phase pushing heavy bullets faster. Then Jurras started pushing lighter bullets faster still.

Hardball may not do quite as well against a 250-pounder who spent the last 10 years pumping iron in the prison yard. Of course, under those circumstances, a hollowpoint may not do a lot better...which is why we shoot until he's down or until the slide locks.

"Two in the body, one in the head guarantees he's really dead."

It's also why Dirty Harry carried a .44 Magnum.:rolleyes: Then, there is always the Desert Eagle and .50AE. (Fish is lucky he only had a 10mm).

Slow and heavy, light and fast, or heavy and fast. Solid, HP or FMJ. I don't want to get hit with any of them.
 
Here ya go, Dom.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Jurras

Elmer Keith started the magnum phase pushing heavy bullets faster.

There were a few things that led to the development of the .357 Magnum. Keith was one of them with his loading heavy .38 Special cases with a 160-grain cast SWC to 1200 fps, which led to the .38-44HD revolvers and ammunition. The problems started when Joe Blow ignored the warnings to only use the ammo in large-framed Colt and Smith & Wesson revolvers...and fired it in the .38 Hand Ejector models...later known as K-Frame/Model 10...and shot revolvers apart while-u-wait. Smith & Wesson responded by stretching the case and chambering their big N-Frames for it, even though the .38-44 ammunition remained in the catalogs for several years.

His work with heavy .44 Special loadings led to the .44 Magnum. He approached Remington Arms with his idea for the cartridge, who told by Smith & Wesson that they'd wrap a gun around any reasonable cartridge that they came up with. A case with the .44 Magnum headstamp was found in a trash dump...delivered to Bill Ruger...and he got the jump on the market by introducing his big.44 Magnum Blackhawk...later to become the Super Blackhawk. The proper name for the .44 Magnum cartridge is .44 Remington Magnum...and "Magnum" is a Smith & Wesson trademark. Only Smith & Wesson revolvers may have the word included in the model's name. All others must be rollmarked: ".357 Magnum/.44 Magnum, etc ctg" to designate the caliber without Smith's permission.
 
I thought wikipedia was a site where anyone could contribute their personal opinions(after registering) whether true or not??? Don't take me wrong here, I'm not suggesting your info is false about Jurras. Without him, the handgun shooting public would be far behind what it has become.
Steve
 
Cooper at the right time and place with the ability to articulate his position in the pages of Guns & Ammo. That got the ball rolling.

Cooper’s WW2 service was basically spent on the battleship Pennsylvania. He was in charge of the Marine detachment and also served in fire direction control department of the ships main battery of 14"guns. Part of his duties was to go ashore and do bombardment survey damage assessment.

In between WW2 and Korea his duties were that of a staff officer.

During Korea he was in the clandestine service.

After Korea with out direct ground combat command experience his career opportunities being limited he separated from service.

During Viet-Nam he volunteered for service but his application was deferred.
 
light weight JHPs in .357, .38+P, and 9mm claiming to expand to the diameter of a .45 hardball and thus deliver the same or better stopping power.

9mm JHPs expand well beyond .45 FMJ diameters. They aren't 'as effective' as .45 FMJ, they are significantly better than it is.
 
Using Lee Jurras is I'm not altogether the right person to justify the existence and use of hollowpoint ammunition:

As for Lee Jurras on self-defense, his acutal opinion might surprise you: It's a bit of a long read, but Lee Jurras is a great writer:
"Since I've got your ear, I do have a question for you.

In another forum, these guys like their loads to go about 14" in gelatin(talking about 45 acp) and stop, expanded.
Now, according to JRH, and myself;-), I would much rather have a heavier projectile, like a 230 grain hollow point,
GD, at 1100 fps(My minimum for self-defense, or, I even like the old Detonics 200 grain flying ashtray at 1200 fps, but, I've heard the new 200 grain bullets aren't as well designed as the 230's, or for that matter, the 185's). My theory is I want that bullet to expand, and continue on it's way, not slowing at all, or very little, through the entire target, for maximum wounding effect. I believe that a high velocity, expanding bullet, that penetrates
it's entire target, maintaining more speed, transfers more kenetic energy to the target, with more surface area due to the heavier, larger, bullet, and the maintained velocity.

This same theory has been best observed using the 458 win magnum on large cats, like lions. The Africa guys swear that the 500 grain bullets, soft points, at lower velocity then the 400-450 grain bullets, at higher velocity, just hit the animal harder, despite being under fackler's mysto 2100 fps(also the target velocity for the old Nitro Express rounds, maybe those old brits
aren't so dumb, afterall). Even though the 400 grain bullets can be put out at 2400 fps, they just don't have the same visible affect that the 500 grain bullets do on lion.

Since I feel almost ALL handguns are not consistent stoppers on man-size targets(vs. my 375 H&H with 270 grain soft points at 2800 fps;-) I think a large, fast moving, expanding bullet is superior to the lighter, slower bullets, that open up, and stop at 14 inches in gelatin. Your thoughts?

P

"P, you keep their heads down with the 45 ACP, and I'll sneak around and hit them with a REAL gun(45 Colt/Linebaugh)"

P, you got my ear, but I'm not sure I can answer in a brief e-mail...here goes... Remeber, these are my HO based on experience, as I am still working on my Doctorate in Ballistics Engineering...If fact having trouble finding a school that offers it. To my knowledge the U. of Berlin was the last..Think they closed the doors in '45....Oh well, I think todays serious junior Ballistics engineer should Major in Chem Eng,with a dual major in Mechanical, and a minor in Wound Ballistics from one of the Major Un's after he got his MD...There are some sharp dudes out there with some great specialists...But I think you have to compile a Blue Ribbon committe to get all the answers. Kinda reminds me years ago we bought a lot of brass from Federal Ctg. If we had a problem with incoming QC, I'd have to go to the factory, and could not talk to an individual...The Pres, would call a meeting and each dept head would be present. As I would ask a question, he would refer to each dept head for the answer....Maybe something as simple as case hardness gradient...Personally I thought it was BS... But you have to remember each of these guys was a specialist in his field.. Combined, they couldn't pull the trigger and hit a target, but combined they could make a product that you could hit the target with....A reporter once asked Werner Von Braun what it was like in layman language to land a man on the moon? he replied after a moments thought...." riding a merry-go-round, shooting a BB gun and hitting a BumbleBee @ a 100 yds"...see how many people NASA has ....Don't get me wrong I'm not trying to put myself in class with these guys, just explainning what happens when guys think one bullet, one load, one caliber should do it all under all circumstances... Well hell I've rattled on here and haven't even started to answer your question....digest this and I'll get back this evening and try to answer your original question...Have to get some work done right now....ATB Lee

P & S; you guys are making my head swim also...Yes I can relate story after story of failures and successes with both high velocity and heavy slow moving bullets..As I mentioned in previous posts; " its a never ending debate , that has no real endind 'cause both have there place....On my first trip to Africa I took a 458 Browning and a SuperBlackHawk 44 Mag. 20 Rds of 500gr. SP and 20 rds of 500 Solids plus 100 rds of 180 gr. JSP for the 44 Mag... When my Pro Hunter saw the 500gr, Soft Points for the 458 he said, "what are you going to do with those", told him I thought probably Lion...He said, "you been reading too much Jack O'Conner"...then he said what are you going to do if a Cape Buff charges without notice of we come up on an Elephant? He said "we only use solids ", solids will kill a Lion OK, but you don't want to get caught with SP's in the magazine when you need solids...Think about it....Well I said I'll trade you these 20 SP's for 20 Solids, he said NO we'll sell you 20 solids, take the SP's home and shoot them at Deer or something....The Point being that your favorite manstopping load might not cut the mustard if it has to go thru a car door, glass, brush or some body armor. I've seen guys load their revolvers with three different loads so as to be prepared for all circumstances, and they actually believed that these events should follow in a orchestrated manner????The 14" of geletin is fine for lab analylsis and a theoretical situation, someone has to explain to the widow why that theory didn't hold water after the fact: now maybe thats a little rash, but it has happened...You say you feel ALL handguns are not consistent stoppers on man sized targets"...I SAY if the caliber starts with a 4, and weighs at least 250 grs, moving at least 950 fps. IT WILL be consistent if properly placed...Thats the big secret. I also believe if it starts with a 3 and weighs 110 grs, traveling at least 1350 fps, it can be a consistent stopper also....provided its properly placed...Now before I hear the onslaught of disbelief....remember the little tail about the solids and the SP's I mentioned....Use the right equipment...Guys usually know the general senario they will be facing...The NYC detective 's will probably differ from The Montana Hiway Patrolman, just as the guy going after Grizz with his favorite 44 or 45, or 475 and 500 will differ from the Eastern Whitetail hunter...Now this might not answer all your questions P BUT...I don't believe there is a pat answer...I personally have tried to choose the equipment for the job...And or offered the Individaul a choice. I took my choice, design, and finished product at tested it in a good portion of the world under a variety of circumstances....My choice today for Grizz or Moose in Alaska, My 375 Howdah or my 475 Linebaugh...All lesser game my Ruger 44 Mag SuperBlackhawk.Jurras 180 gr. JSP.... Personal defense My 70 Series 1911.or 4" 25-5....All-around one gun...Probably 44 Superblackhawk....But who wants just one gun.....If I could only own one, I'd probably have to say my Linebaugh 475, could load in down for squirrel or up for bear....All around bullet design Keith style SWC....Hope I haven't confused the issue...For those of you that might mistake my trivia for just an old man...thats what worked and continues to work for me....Onward and upward...the Curmudgeon"

Lee matched his BULLET to his target. Situation requiring less penetration, he used the 180 grain soft point, or even HP's for varmits, going nearly 1900 fps. For bigger, more dangerous game, he would use silhouette 180 grain bullets, pretty much truncated cone bullet designs, that didn't expand, but, went to the same point of aim, and, thanks to velocity, penetrated very well.
 
Things seem to have gone south here. Bullets expanding tanslates to tissue damage while translates into produce over penetration. Do you really need a defence bullet to go through your target and then into a childs bedroom? Doesn't it?
That's why so many so called expert recommend shotguns for defense, isn't it?
I see a lot of Gun Store commandoism here.
Steve
 
Steve:
So, I post one of the owners of an ammunition company's view on self-defense, a guy that's been in the business for nearly 60 years, and he says

"" its a never ending debate , that has no real endind 'cause both have there place."

Also:
".The Point being that your favorite manstopping load might not cut the mustard if it has to go thru a car door, glass, brush or some body armor. I've seen guys load their revolvers with three different loads so as to be prepared for all circumstances, and they actually believed that these events should follow in a orchestrated manner????The 14" of geletin is fine for lab analylsis and a theoretical situation, someone has to explain to the widow why that theory didn't hold water after the fact: now maybe thats a little rash, but it has happened...You say you feel ALL handguns are not consistent stoppers on man sized targets"...I SAY if the caliber starts with a 4, and weighs at least 250 grs, moving at least 950 fps. IT WILL be consistent if properly placed...Thats the big secret. I also believe if it starts with a 3 and weighs 110 grs, traveling at least 1350 fps, it can be a consistent stopper also....provided its properly placed...Now before I hear the onslaught of disbelief....remember the little tail about the solids and the SP's I mentioned....Use the right equipment...Guys usually know the general senario they will be facing...The NYC detective 's will probably differ from The Montana Hiway Patrolman, just as the guy going after Grizz with his favorite 44 or 45, or 475 and 500 will differ from the Eastern Whitetail hunter...Now this might not answer all your questions P BUT...I don't believe there is a pat answer.."

So, I think I'll go with his observations and experience, if you don't mind.
 
I no longer waste my money on the expensive hollow points that younger shooters seem to be impressed with. Also, feeding may be questionable with some hollow points.

"Younger shooters"? I'm about to turn 66 and have been shooting .45s since 1969. I wouldn't carry FMJ unless I was required to by law or regulation.

When your life's on the line, using the least effective ammo available makes no sense at all.
 
Putting aside for the moment the tangential discussion of "factory plugged" HPs vs. conventional HPs, the arguments made here in favor of FMJs over JHPs for defensive use seem to mostly filter down to only two:

1) Feed/function reliability enhancement

2) JHPs may plug up or otherwise not expand


It seems to me that argument #1 may be a gun problem, not a bullet problem.

It seems to me that argument #2 boils down to "I prefer an FMJ over a JHP, because the JHP may plug up/fail to expand and act like an FMJ."
 
The beauty of a HP is it doesn't act like a Round nose bullet. It acts like a truncated cone, which tends to maintain it's path better, and straighter then round nose bullets do.

I wish Truncated cones were more popular in .45 ACP, and cheap.
 
Well, since the last time I posted in this thread topic I've fired several hundred hollowpoint rounds through a couple of my 1911's, using magazines which have been inspected and have demonstrated themselves to feed & function well in my guns.

Since I was only using them for range guns when working ranges, and haven't been carrying them lately, I occasionally left one or the other of them dirty from one range to the next. A couple of times I realized I couldn't remember when I'd last cleaned one of them, so I just wiped off the rails, ran a patch or bore snake through the barrel, and then lubed them. (I'd obviously have cleaned them immediately after shooting them if I'd been carrying them between range sessions. ;) )

They still seem to run well with my assorted duty-type hollowpoints ... so, I still have no plans to use my remaining amount of new factory 'ball loads, even for range use, but especially not for dedicated carry purpose.

Maybe if I was shooting an older 1911, Star PD or an early 220 which was fussy about hollowpoints (but luckily for me, even my Star PD of many years ago fed & fired the hollowpoints of that time with aplomb ;) ).

Different strokes. :)
 
I thought wikipedia was a site where anyone could contribute their personal opinions(after registering) whether true or not???

Not entirely true, but this is a pretty common misconception. There is a lot of editing involved, and oftentimes you will find the little blue tags "citation needed" or "source" which mean that there is no citation yet or conversely that this is the source.
I really do wish more people got informed about the wiki idea, because ultimately the format is more accurate than some guy sitting down and writing the meaning of words down, as he thinks they are ... which is basically the first dictionary.
 
With quality ammo prices today I'm glad I only need to shoot couple times a year to keep up my skills. I suspect about year from now shelves will be devoid of fodder except for .40S&W and .44Mag.
 
I'd rather have those truncated cones in my 1911 then ball ammo.

I still carry 45 Super 230 grain HPS, anyway, but, in a few other mags I have ball.
 
TC has the drawback of reduced feed reliability, same as JHP, without the advantage of the expanding round.

TC is great for targets, punches holes in paper almost as neat as SWC, but for defensive purposes, giving up a small % of feed reliability would be a trade off if it meant gaining a more effective expanding round, but that's not what happens here. The cost is less reliable feeding, the gain is nothing. That's not a tradeoff, that's a straight downgrade.
 
Speaking only for myself, I've never had a problem with solid, truncated cone bullets...including in original, unaltered USGI pistols. The advantage of the TC 230-grain bullet is that at a given velocity, it penetrates a bit further than hardball. If memory serves me...but it's been 25 years ago...they penetrated about 4 inches deeper in ballistic gelatin at 850 fps mv.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top