"Yea, I don't know anyone who would stand in front of my .25 ACP".
(Btw, just an example. Insert any caliber you want or whatever, but you get the point).
What's your opinion on this often touted ideology, if that's the correct word to use? Here's mine (kinda long).
You're sitting at a table eating lunch at a cafe. You're relaxed, enjoying yourself. A 16 year old girl walks up to you, and asks for permission to pinch the crud out of you, breaking the skin and causing bleeding. And then, will pour some 91% alcohol on the small wound. Would you agree, and say "Sure, go for it!"? No? Why not? 99.999999999 % chance it's not gonna kill you, it's not a major injury at all, it'll suck for a little bit, and then you go about your day. I can tell you why I, and anyone in their right mind would say no. People (in their right mind) do not want to be subject to abuse, pain, trauma, or anything negative in general, especially physically. But lets go back to my example. The girl asks to pinch the crud out of you, breaking the skin, and then pouring alcohol on the wound. You refuse, right?
Ok, now, on the basis of you refusing that happening to you, does that mean a pinch and alcohol is an extremely effective weapon against an attacker? So going forward, anyone who disputes that method of self defense, ask them to let you do it, and if they refuse, it shows..... What? And that's just a pinch, how about letting a 15 year old, 140lb male punch you in the nose. Why not? It's just a young, lightweight kid, not like you have to worry about getting dropped, KO'd, or dying (in general).
**Just because something SUCKS to be subject to, in which causing most people to not wanna have it happen to them, whether it be a pinch, slap, punch, etc., doesn't mean it's effective, optimal, or even reasonable.**
(Btw, just an example. Insert any caliber you want or whatever, but you get the point).
What's your opinion on this often touted ideology, if that's the correct word to use? Here's mine (kinda long).
You're sitting at a table eating lunch at a cafe. You're relaxed, enjoying yourself. A 16 year old girl walks up to you, and asks for permission to pinch the crud out of you, breaking the skin and causing bleeding. And then, will pour some 91% alcohol on the small wound. Would you agree, and say "Sure, go for it!"? No? Why not? 99.999999999 % chance it's not gonna kill you, it's not a major injury at all, it'll suck for a little bit, and then you go about your day. I can tell you why I, and anyone in their right mind would say no. People (in their right mind) do not want to be subject to abuse, pain, trauma, or anything negative in general, especially physically. But lets go back to my example. The girl asks to pinch the crud out of you, breaking the skin, and then pouring alcohol on the wound. You refuse, right?
Ok, now, on the basis of you refusing that happening to you, does that mean a pinch and alcohol is an extremely effective weapon against an attacker? So going forward, anyone who disputes that method of self defense, ask them to let you do it, and if they refuse, it shows..... What? And that's just a pinch, how about letting a 15 year old, 140lb male punch you in the nose. Why not? It's just a young, lightweight kid, not like you have to worry about getting dropped, KO'd, or dying (in general).
**Just because something SUCKS to be subject to, in which causing most people to not wanna have it happen to them, whether it be a pinch, slap, punch, etc., doesn't mean it's effective, optimal, or even reasonable.**
Last edited: