jar
Contributing Member
patent
There are many that like the 40S&W and that's fine.
I fear it and will not use it because IMHO it has far too small a safety marging.
The overpressure curve with increasing setback is a classic J curve. The pressures, already high to startwith go nearly straight up.
The case walls in relation to pressure are among the thinnest of any caliber.
The straight walls make setback issues and crimping problems more likely.
It's a high pressure round (as is the 9mm) initially, but the factors above make problems far more likely.
IMHO, any possible advantages simply don't outway the increased risks.
The 45GAP however is a relatively low pressure round, with a relatively thick case and a much thicker base. It is shorter than the 45acp, 40S&W or 9mm. This means that even with a staggered magazine design, reasonable trigger grip relationships can be maintained. In addition, it shouold be a big asset in revolvers where the shorter stubbier case will make reloading faster and easier.
There are many that like the 40S&W and that's fine.
I fear it and will not use it because IMHO it has far too small a safety marging.
The overpressure curve with increasing setback is a classic J curve. The pressures, already high to startwith go nearly straight up.
The case walls in relation to pressure are among the thinnest of any caliber.
The straight walls make setback issues and crimping problems more likely.
It's a high pressure round (as is the 9mm) initially, but the factors above make problems far more likely.
IMHO, any possible advantages simply don't outway the increased risks.
The 45GAP however is a relatively low pressure round, with a relatively thick case and a much thicker base. It is shorter than the 45acp, 40S&W or 9mm. This means that even with a staggered magazine design, reasonable trigger grip relationships can be maintained. In addition, it shouold be a big asset in revolvers where the shorter stubbier case will make reloading faster and easier.