1KPerDay
Member
This one is fine, IMO: Ruger LCP, 3 mags mixed fmj, 102 gr. Remington Golden Sabre, Speer Gold Dot, 15 feet, standing 2 handed.
This is the one that raised my eyebrows. New Ruger MKIII 22/45, 30 feet, 10 shots standing 2 hands, federal "champion" bulk. mag safety has been removed, otherwise stock.
top target LCP, middle Taurus PT101AF .40, 2 mags worth 30 feet, Remington/UMC ball, bottom 22/45
3 shots Fiocchi V-max 40 gr. Ruger 196 series ranch rifle 50 yds
top target, top group ruger 10/22 carbine, fed bulk, 50 yds; top target lower group 10 shots ranch rifle mixed brands XM193 50 yds, middle target 5 shots fed bulk, JC higgins mod 31 open sights, bottom target 3 shots fiocchi 40 gr vmax ranch rifle. all shot prone from a semi-wobbly range bag rest.
The Ruger I have no problems with, and I guess I can handle the Taurus... it's pretty loose everywhere but it works. for 22 shots offhand I can see that... at least there's sort of a central pattern.
The 22/45 is what surprised me. it's a 5" bull barrel. I expected a lot more accuracy. So here are my possible excuses:
1. crappy trigger?
2. crappy bulk ammo?
3. I suck at shooting paper?
4. pistol is inherently inaccurate?
5. My expectations are too high?
ix. all of the above
Any thoughts?
I suppose I really should take the time to go to an actual bench/range with a shooting rest/bags and try to eliminate as many variables as possible... but I really felt like I was doing a passable job with the fundamentals.
This is the one that raised my eyebrows. New Ruger MKIII 22/45, 30 feet, 10 shots standing 2 hands, federal "champion" bulk. mag safety has been removed, otherwise stock.
top target LCP, middle Taurus PT101AF .40, 2 mags worth 30 feet, Remington/UMC ball, bottom 22/45
3 shots Fiocchi V-max 40 gr. Ruger 196 series ranch rifle 50 yds
top target, top group ruger 10/22 carbine, fed bulk, 50 yds; top target lower group 10 shots ranch rifle mixed brands XM193 50 yds, middle target 5 shots fed bulk, JC higgins mod 31 open sights, bottom target 3 shots fiocchi 40 gr vmax ranch rifle. all shot prone from a semi-wobbly range bag rest.
The Ruger I have no problems with, and I guess I can handle the Taurus... it's pretty loose everywhere but it works. for 22 shots offhand I can see that... at least there's sort of a central pattern.
The 22/45 is what surprised me. it's a 5" bull barrel. I expected a lot more accuracy. So here are my possible excuses:
1. crappy trigger?
2. crappy bulk ammo?
3. I suck at shooting paper?
4. pistol is inherently inaccurate?
5. My expectations are too high?
ix. all of the above
Any thoughts?
I suppose I really should take the time to go to an actual bench/range with a shooting rest/bags and try to eliminate as many variables as possible... but I really felt like I was doing a passable job with the fundamentals.