^^^Neither. There is a third option that does not need to be mentioned. That would be my choice.
This
^^^Neither. There is a third option that does not need to be mentioned. That would be my choice.
No, no search warrants based on the data, but the search warrant could be done on the reported threat that some low-life snitch was prepared to swear too....identify by illegal NICS data, surveillance, gather info, then get the search warrant.
If you have been born, given a name or gone to school you are in a database. So what? What do you do with all that info? Nothing. No one is going to kick in your door and drag away your family in the middle of the night because you turned on a computer or ordered something by mail.If you are reading this you have been identified as a 2nd A supporter and are in a database!
They are not working to legislate car ownership out of existence as they are guns. Yet. It is always error to compare guns with cars.I never cared that much about a registry. I'll tell Joe Biden what I own. I'm not hiding. Why should I? If the big plan is to make a list, they're going to have a REALLY LONG LIST. Are they going to put eighty million people in reeducation camps? Let's be serious. I don't want a registry, but it's way down the list of things I'm worried about. There's a registry of cars and that hasn't done a thing to limit car ownership. Quite the contrary, it's helped to normalize it and give car owners awesome political powers. The key is to craft a regulatory system friendly towards gun ownership and supportive of it.
I'm much more concerned about making our voices heard and doling out some brutal punishments for this year's misbehavior in next year's elections. That's always where our strength has been. We don't win by hiding. As witnessed by the many gun owners who deny having guns when the pollsters call--thus skewing statistics in their favor.
Illegally gained info cannot be used to obtain a warrant or charges. "Fruit from the poisoned tree" principle in law. It is currently illegal for the government to keep NICS records. If they do anyway, they cannot use it to obtain search warrants.
Fear of Big Brother's supposed omnipotence is not a reason to submit to Big Brother. Especially when we know how incompetent Big Brother really is.
I'm sorry if you really believe this. When talking weapons, all they have to do is cry "national security" and all your rights are gone. No lawyers, no trial, nothing. IMO, that was the most dangerous law put in place in the last 50 years.
I never cared that much about a registry. I'll tell Joe Biden what I own. I'm not hiding. Why should I? If the big plan is to make a list, they're going to have a REALLY LONG LIST. Are they going to put eighty million people in reeducation camps? Let's be serious. I don't want a registry, but it's way down the list of things I'm worried about. There's a registry of cars and that hasn't done a thing to limit car ownership. Quite the contrary, it's helped to normalize it and give car owners awesome political powers. The key is to craft a regulatory system friendly towards gun ownership and supportive of it.
I'm much more concerned about making our voices heard and doling out some brutal punishments for this year's misbehavior in next year's elections. That's always where our strength has been. We don't win by hiding. As witnessed by the many gun owners who deny having guns when the pollsters call--thus skewing statistics in their favor.
As a Vet....they already consider me a possible terrorist anyways. So screw 'em.If you are reading this you have been identified as a 2nd A supporter and are in a database!
So we've moved from UBC > registration > confiscation > Big Brother > no rights > no lawyer > no trail > imprisonment!!!???What law do you mean? No law allows that. The Constitution trumps all other laws.
I'm equally sorry if you believe that. Fiction.
What rock have you been hiding under the past 10 years?