How about adding some empty 12 ga. shells along with an old shirt with a bullet or shotgun hole and some dried cow blood around the hole?Snagglepuss said:In addition you might also sprinkle some spent .44 casings around the back door.
Nematocyst-870 said:How about adding some empty 12 ga. shells along with an old shirt with a bullet or shotgun hole and some dried cow blood around the hole?
I am really not a highjacker of threads but it appears I am going from bad to worse.
You could also keep a 3' x 7' flower bed in the backyard, never plant any flowers and always keep the soil tilled and piled. Keep the shovel stuck in the bed.
tube_ee said:There's no other single handgun that can do what a 4" .357 service revolver can do.
Small game? Check. 38 wadcutters or round nose kill 'em dead, and don't waste much meat.
Medium game? Check. Hot n' Heavy handloads or Buffalo Bore-style commercial loads are proven killers on deer and pigs.
Personal Defense? Check. The only thing the M&S and Fackler camps seem to agree on is that the .357 has no superiors in this area. There are some that are as good, but none better.
Target Shooting? Check. 38 special handloading is about as cheap and accurate as centerfire handgunning gets.
Just about the only things you can't do with a .357 are truly big game hunting (more gun is a good idea), and Bullseye competition (which requires, for reasons I don't understand, a .45 ACP)
--Shannon
Because it's a proven, powerful, readily available round.AsianDragonPower said:why is everyone picking 357?
when it only has six shots?
The Taurus PT-92AFS that I have now.goings_51 said:If you had to choose 1 handgun, what would it be?
assegai said:Ignorance, that is about the .22lr conversion units available for 1911's, some of which group 1.5" at 50 yds, guaranteed, that .38 wadcutters might as well be .22lr's for no more than you can do with them, and ignorance of the fact that you can get a 165 gr .45 jhp to 1400 fps in a standard 1911 with 10.0 grs of Unique. Dean Grennel and Mason Williams were doing so in 1973, without the advantages of heavy springs or a fully-supported barrel. If you want to use a hard cast 160 gr swc, you can get 1450 fps with relative ease, with half a grain less powder.