Illegal Immigrants vs. Citizens' Arrest

Status
Not open for further replies.
Longeyes,
No, actually I said "remove the carrot," did I not? I am for fining
employers who hire illegals and ending public benefits to illegals.
Sorry, I must have misunderstood you.

Jimpeel,
Actually, it would be a good start.
No, it wouldn’t even begin to accomplish anything. The role of the military is vastly different than the role of the BCBP/BICE/BP/etc. There are rumblings of giving local LEO’s limited authority to enforce INA violations, which would accomplish a whole lot because there would begin to be some immigration enforcement within the United States. Unless enforcement practices change to include a lot more interior work nothing much will change no matter how many people are put on the border. In addition, I will say what I have said time and time again; enforcement practices of any sort will never solve the situation.
 
I think we are bound to be most effective by removing the
incentives for coming here, drying up the benefits and the jobs.

Is there a role for the military? I believe there is and will be, but
in my view it is not going to happen "at the border" but rather,
ultimately, INSIDE MEXICO. We are going to need to "come to an
understanding" with the Mexican government about a whole slew of
things, and these matters go beyond their deliberate attempt to
export their social unrest to us. The border is a long, open wound.
 
Tancredo calls illegal immigration threat to U.S.

By GARY HARMON, The Daily Sentinel

Illegal immigration into the United States threatens the future of the nation, a Colorado congressman told Mesa County Republicans on Friday.

U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Centennial, drew two standing ovations from about 100 Republicans, even though he acknowledged his stand on illegal immigration runs counter to that of the party's leader, President Bush.

Forcing a national debate over illegal immigration transcends party loyalty though, he said. At issue, he said, isn't so much whether the United States will have a Balkanized future, but whether it will have a future as a nation at all.

Illegal immigration combined with "the cult of multiculturalism" and the welfare state threaten to undermine and bankrupt American institutions, he said.

Tancredo joked that he actually was on his way to California to get in on the governor's race. In an exclusive interview with The Daily Sentinel, however, he said the stakes actually are a bit higher than a governor's race.

He has visited California on several occasions with the hope of forcing illegal immigration to a top-level issue in the 2004 presidential race.

One vehicle, he said, might be a referendum in the nation's most populous state that would limit access to any government services to citizens or legal residents only.

"Even if I'm 180 degrees wrong," he said, "the subject at least deserves a debate."

Tancredo said he advocates securing the nation's southern border using a 20,000-strong Border Patrol combined with high-tech equipment to prevent illegal border crossings.

A guest-worker program might be in order for industries that couldn't otherwise find employees, but no such program could work without a secure border, he said.

It's particularly important to secure the border, he said, because it isn't used only by Mexicans seeking employment.

"Huge numbers" of Middle-Easterners frequently cross the border, often helped by Mexican drug gangs who charge $30,000 for the use of their expertise, he said.

"I don't blame them," he said of illegal immigrants looking north for opportunity, but he noted the Mexican government relies heavily on money sent by illegal immigrants to their relatives to bolster the economy.

That amounts to about $10 billion a year, a third of the Mexican gross domestic product, he said.

Tancredo urged the Mesa County Republicans to insist that all candidates be held to account on illegal-immigration issues.

Even if offices such as city council or county commissioner seem to have little to do with illegal immigration, candidates still should be forced to take a position.

"Get them on record," he said.
 
Good article. At least someone from the spinelessrepublican party is trying. Trouble is he is being undercut by the party's leaders.

Bush needs to be squeezed and squeezed hard on illegal immigration. He should be forced to get to the record and actually state his beliefs.

If Democrats were smart and desperate enough they would haul out illegal immigration as a club and bust Bush with it. It would take a reversal of field by Democrats and some clever lying to make it look like they were against it all along. No problem. . . they are up to it.

Revolutions start for less cause than what is happening now on the southern US border.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top