Interesting .308 Win vs. 6.5 Creedmore

Status
Not open for further replies.
Regardless, I read the PA article that sparked this thread when it first published, and thought it was an unnecessary congregation of old news and simple ballistic calculations that would have been obvious long ago to anyone who has shot both chamberings or even spent a minimal amount of time reading about them. It's interesting that such a basic, regurgitative article generated so much "debate" here.
 
Last edited:
All this said about how much better the 6.5 Creedmore is than my beloved .308 Win has made this 45 years .264 fan want one for my AR 10 precision rifle. That way I can test it side by side with the 7.62 .out to the 600 yard range I have access to.
 
So which is better the 6mm Creedmore or the 6.5 Creedhmore. ? and just why would the 6mm Creedmore be so much better than a .243 AI ?

Better for what application/purpose? Custom barrel or reamed factory jobber?
 
I have a 1959 Model 70 in .243 AI , and it is a great hunting round up to 250 pounds and 400 yards. All I need when I get old, really. But was thinking about AR 10 Precision rifle for which I want a Long range barrel for, it is an 18" .308 Criterion now.
 
If spotting your own splashes is important, then the 6.5 and 6 are a better option than 308win - as is the 243AI. In an AR-10/LR-308, you’ll be able to get more bullet into a 6 creed case than a 243win AI and still fit into the mag. The 6.5 creed gives more splash and target response than the 6/243, and the 308win more than that, but of course the harder it hits the target, the harder it hit your shoulder too, so you’ll be less likely to see your own impacts anyway. I CAN spot my hits with my 308win, but it really needs to be past 600yrds (time of flight vs. recoil recovery), and I’m a lot slower in splits and transitions to do it. With my 6 creeds, I can spot impacts even if the target is up close.

The 243/6 have less drop and drift from a shorter ToF than the 6.5.

Pick your poison. I’d rather have a 6.5 for killing deer at 800yrds, but for everything else, I’d rather have a 6/243. Between the 6/243, the only differences are barrel life, mag length issues, and powder consumption. The 243AI will push a couple hundred FPS faster, but not a huge shift in trajectory.

For what it’s worth, the 243win AI has been one of my favorite cartridges since the late 1990’s. After shooting the 6 Creed the last two years, it also has joined those ranks. Between the two, I’m hard pressed to say which I prefer - although I DID sell off my 243 RPR when the 6 version came out, and I DID buy a 6 creed barrel to replace a 243AI tube on one of my Strikers. So maybe my actions reveal what my words don’t.
 
Thanks guys, I was curious what y'all thought.

Being out here im a bit disconnected from some of the advantages, and disadvantages of firearms related stuff on the mainland.
Main advantage is you can fondle your weapon while watching war movies and say "That's what I would have done.". Meanwhile forgetting that you are 400lbs, go to the range every 3 years and can't walk 10 miles let alone carry a 100 plus pound pack that far.
I do have a 308, but I shoot subs in it for fun.
I hunt with a 240wby, 6.5x55 and my wife uses a 260 rem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top