Iraqi terrorist snipers learning from US expert

Status
Not open for further replies.

Preacherman

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
13,306
Location
Louisiana, USA
From the Telegraph, London (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...F4AVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2006/10/29/wirq29.xml):



Iraqi rebels learn from US sniper guru


By Robert Watson in Baghdad
Last Updated: 1:04am GMT 29/10/2006


wirq29a.jpg


A masked insurgent looks through the scope of his sniper rifle in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul


Iraqi insurgents have formed a special sniper brigade which is drawing its inspiration from a US training manual by one of America's most revered snipers.

A new insurgent propaganda video shows how guerrillas have dramatically upped their kill rate of US soldiers with the help of The Ultimate Sniper, written by a retired US Marines major, John Plaster.

The tactics they have gleaned from the book, which is available on the internet along with an accompanying DVD, are thought to be behind a steep rise in the level of sniper fire on US troops in recent months.

A total of 36 such attacks have been recorded by the US military in Baghdad alone this month, of which at least eight are believed to have been fatal. In January, by contrast, sniper fire incidents were barely above single figures, and deaths relatively rare.

The video is thought to have been made by the Islamic Army of Iraq, whose followers are drawn largely from the 400,000 former Iraqi army soldiers who were dismissed by the US.
advertisement

It is believed to have links to al-Qaeda, but the film tries to distance itself from the bloody methods of the foreign jihadists who kill civilians indiscriminately in their attempts to spark a civil war.

The tape features a long monologue by a man sitting in front of a sniper rifle whose face is obscured by computer pixelation. He describes the skills needed by the marksman – a steady hand, concentration and, above all, faith in Allah.

The video also shows a squad of men in lush, green fields typical of the Euphrates in the Sunni triangle, practising shooting with American M16s fitted with sniper scopes.

While the commander says his men use the Iraqi-made Tobruk rifle, the training manual has chunks written by one of the top-ranked retired marine snipers Major Plaster.

Major Plaster wrote his authoritative manual after three top-secret tours in Vietnam, sneaking behind enemy lines in Laos and Cambodia as part of the Studies and Observation Group. His book on sharp-shooting was described by one reviewer as "a great reference volume that could accompany training which is available to the military, police and citizens 'of good, moral character' ". The major was unavailable for comment yesterday.

The rise in sniper attacks has been most marked since June, when the US military put more troops back on to the streets of Baghdad after deciding that Iraqi forces were unable to cope. The dense urban environment, littered with numerous derelict buildings, provides gunmen with easy vantage points to pick off passing patrols.

The video, which is slickly produced and has English subtitles, is yet another sign of the increasing sophistication of the tactics of the Islamic Army in Iraq. While most of their members served in Saddam's military forces, training at that time was poor and produced few capable marksmen.

By contrast, the ability of the US forces' sniper units has always been admired, even by their Iraqi guerrilla enemies: their top operators can kill from up to 1,000 metres.

The insurgents have now also seized upon the propaganda value of their own sharp shooters, with their video including a "documentary" on a legendary insurgent sniper nicknamed Juba by US troops. The film, entitled Juba Returns, was handed out as a gift for Eid, the holiday marking the end of Ramadan, in Sunni areas of west Baghdad last week. Although some reports claim that Juba was killed some time ago – or may even never have existed – the film denies reports of his death and elevates him to a heroic status.

Interlaced with the documentary are shots of insurgent marksmen being trained and footage of American soldiers being targeted. Some are clearly dead, falling like puppets whose strings have been cut, others writhe around with wounds to the leg or abdomen.

"The idea of filming the operations is very important," one insurgent commander says on the video, his head covered in a red keffiyah headscarf. "The scene that shows the falling soldier when hit has more impact on the enemy than any other weapon."

Certainly the threat of death from an unseen enemy is enough to spook US soldiers. On patrol, top gunners now crouch behind armoured turrets when passing through built-up areas. The biggest fear of US troops is still the unseen and devastating roadside bomb, but wariness of the sniper squad is growing. The US military thinks the snipers are singling out medics, engineers and chaplains, in the belief that such casualties are especially demoralising. Commanders have been holding meetings about how best to respond to the new threat.
 
"retired US Marines major, John Plaster"

"one of the top-ranked retired marine snipers Major Plaster."

Major Plaster was in the ARMY.

Simple Google search, third result down.

Apparently the author can't even get that fact down. He must have very reliable sources confirming ALL of his information for him:fire: :banghead:

But if it is true that Iraqi marksmen (NOT snipers, they didn't earn the title) are becoming more prevelant, that is obviously a very bad thing.

I hope that is not true, because our men and women have to fight hard enough already.

Thank you for your service. Good luck, stay safe.
 
I have the book also. There the author notes that some areas have been left gray and some uncovered because it's commonly available book. Those omitted areas are covered in some military/leo version of the book, namely police sniper tactics, urban sniping tactics in more comprehensive level.

This was to be expected, IMHO, since prolonged war of this style will get stupid enemies killed and smart ones evolving into better and more effective killing machines. So's with snipers, they get there real life and harsh training, stupid ones get killed, so maybe with more smart enemies the death rate of friendlies rise.

To counter that the tactics of friendlies should be evolving too, to cover new and emerging threats, like enemy marksmen in better level.
 
I'm a bit more concerned with the heavy emphasis on the fact that they're using a training manual like that.
 
I not surprised. They use the internet what else would you expect?


100 dollars says a number of militants have rolled through sites like THR, TFL, Sniper Country, ArfCom, Glocktalk, etc, etc, MORE than just once twice.

That kind of thing cannot be prevented. Slightly worriesome, yes, but a fact of life.
 
"a Rifleman Goes to War" would be just as good a book as any and it has been available since after WWI. I agree with extended conflict creating better killers. It's doubtful that the Plaster book is responsible for any increased effectiveness from Iraqi snipers, they seem to have been evolving their tactics over the years and seem to be following a much different approach than outlined in the book which begins with mostly historic information and then has basics explained later. From what I've read though about the current conflict it seems everythings much more close range than anything that would require actual rifle skills. 16 year old girls in Viet Nam were doing a better job as snipers with the "red butt" single shot Chinese rifles and they didn't require a translation of a US book to do it, only generations of armed conflict. The whole article seems just a tool to target gun related non-fiction as a deadly weapon probably another step towards thought crime related to firearms since outlawing guns in the UK hasn't worked it must be those pesky gun books and see here's proof.
 
I wanted to add too that no book is a substitute to professional training. Even without the Plaster book the US sniper field manual is readily available at fas.org.

Now what? Will they ban books because someone can actually learn something from it?
 
This is no big deal, they have access to anything through the internet. I hope Major Plaster doesn't catch any flak for this, because it is in no way his fault.
 
It should be noted that many US FMs and TMs are easily obtained on the Net, as they were never classified, to include the USMC Scout/Sniper manual.

Now that I think about it, the Art of War is on Project Gutenberg! When will it stop? :rolleyes:
 
MAJ Plaster's book and videos have helped me as well. His book is very well distributed in US military circles. Let's see who this information helps more. The fact that a couple of them may have half a clue does not negate all the good this information does for our boys. Their "macho" attitude is the major detriment to their marksmanship.

There are a gazillion books on marksmanship, we'd have to send a time machine back to un-invent the rifle (and the printing press) for it to make a difference.

The insurgent in the photo has an excellent, stable shooting position...he has learned well I see.:rolleyes: "....you can lead a horse to water..."
 
Cromlech said:
This is no big deal, they have access to anything through the internet. I hope Major Plaster doesn't catch any flak for this, because it is in no way his fault.

Agreed.

Where there's a will there's a way. There's a heck of a lot of information out there and the BG's will get the information they seek somewhere, somehow.
 
I'd thought there was already a number of snipers active for several years? Wasn't there one active in Bagdhad who only took one shot with an SVD, and was managing to hit our troops through gaps in body armor from pretty extreme distances?

There's unfortunately not much you can do to prevent that if they're learning to take one shot and only one shot with a 7.62x54R, then take off. Any time a soldier pokes their head out a hatch, they're at risk.

The dangers of urban warfare in places with some of the most sniper-beneficial buildings in the world, what with all the rooftop terraces and outside stairs and all.
 
We can only hope that they all cant the weapon and don't know the value of a good shooters sling.
 
i don't recall faith in Allah being the most important sniper skill in plaster's book.

i'm going to go out on a limb here and suggest the "Islamic Army" will learn about as much from that book as the press did.
 
The terrorists have been using the internet to spread their propaganda, communication among cells & apparently to gain training info. :banghead: It will also mean their downfall :fire:
 
45guy I'm not sure I agree. Category C might be more fitting. In those 'juba' videos the targets are never far away, in fact they seem to have more in common with drive-by's. If America was invaded, then people resisting with hunting rifles would probably be called Marksmen.

"...6-4. TYPES OF ENEMY SNIPERS AND THEIR CAPABILITIES

The three general types of snipers are the specially trained and equipped individual, the trained marksman, and the civilian irregular. Each has different characteristics of operation and may be used to accomplish different purposes. Countermeasures effective against one type may be less effective against another.

a. Specially Trained Sniper. The most dangerous sniper is the individual who has been specially selected, trained, and equipped with a modern scope-mounted sniper rifle. These individuals are expert shots and are trained to select key individuals as their targets. They can hit at great range (sometimes out to 1,000 meters) and are skilled in avoiding detection. They are normally members of an organized, armed force and wear a standard uniform that may be modified to provide better camouflage. Their actions are carefully integrated into the overall plan of operation. This sniper is the most difficult to counter effectively. Until recently, there were not many potential adversaries of the US that could produce significant numbers of such individuals. Many armies in the world now have a renewed interest in snipers. More and more sniper training is taking place, with an increase of high-power rifles that are available at a reasonable cost on the world arms market. US forces can expect to see more and more trained snipers with improved weapons systems during future urban operations. Some of these may be equipped with rifles and night observation equipment that are among the best in the world. The US Army and its Western allies already have a relatively large number of this type sniper, as do several states of the former Soviet Union, and the Peoples Republic of China.

b. Trained Marksman. A trained marksman is a common sniper often found in urban combat. This sniper is a trained soldier, equipped with a standard issue weapon, who is an above-average shot. He normally has fair to good field craft skills and is difficult to detect in the urban environment. He may be employed singly or in teams to create confusion among friendly forces, cause casualties, or harass and disrupt the tempo of operations. He is often used by the enemy in an economy-of-force role as a rear guard or covering force, while the main enemy force withdraws. He may also be placed on the perimeter of a defended urban area to provide early warning of the approach of friendly forces and to disrupt and cause them to deploy early. The trained marksman is a dangerous foe. He can be found in fairly large numbers in the armies of many potential adversaries. He is normally a member of an organized, armed force and wears a standard uniform. He may, however, be a guerrilla fighter, in which case he may not wear a recognizable uniform but will normally carry his arms openly.

c. Armed Irregular. The third general type of sniper is the armed irregular. He may have little or no formal military training but may have experience in urban combat. He may or may not wear any distinguishing uniform and may even appear to be merely another of the thousands of noncombatants found in a large urban area. He may or may not carry his weapon openly and may go to great lengths to avoid identification as a sniper. His fires are normally not accurate, and he seldom deliberately targets specific individuals. His actions are not normally integrated into an overall enemy plan, although his attacks may be loosely coordinated with others in his general area. Although this type of sniper has the least ability to cause heavy losses among US forces, he has high value as an element of harassment, and in some stability and support situations he may achieve results far out of proportion to his actual ability to cause casualties.

d. Range of Sniper Attacks. The typical range for a sniper attack is 300 to 600 meters with medium-caliber rifles. Shots from 800 to 1,000 meters are the exception. Heavy sniper rifles (caliber .50, 12.7-mm, 14.5-mm, and 15-mm) with ranges of 1,200 to 1,500 meters are now available around the world. These heavy sniper rifles were originally intended as antimateriel weapons for stand-off attack against high-value targets, such as radar control vans, missiles, parked aircraft, and bulk fuel and ammunition storage sites. They are only marginally accurate enough for long-range shots against individual personnel. It is their ability to shoot through all but the heaviest shielding material, and their devastating effects, that make them valuable psychological weapons. The ability to shoot through common urban building materials makes these large weapons valuable as countersniper tools.

e. Equipment Trends. Several other equipment trends will result in a greater threat to US forces from urban snipers in the future.

(1) The quality and quantity of night observation devices sold on the world market is increasing daily. In the near future, even trained marksmen may be equipped with devices to allow accurate fires at night.

(2) The use of simple, direct-view optical sights on military rifles is increasing. Although not in the accuracy class of true sniper weapons, these sights make the trained marksman a much more dangerous foe. This is especially true within the shorter ranges (less than 200 meters) normally associated with combat in urban areas.

(3) Many armies are now buying simple but effective devices to either silence or suppress the muzzle blast of sniper weapons. These devices inhibit the task of determining the location of a sniper. Although many of these devices significantly reduce the maximum effective range of the weapon, snipers can be very effective at less than 200 meters with these devices attached.

(4) The employment of heavy sniper rifles, such as the .50 caliber, has increased.

(5) The use of laser detection devices to detect, damage, degrade, or prevent the use of snipers has increased..."
 
You shine it into their scope, where the glass will focus the ray into a ~.1mm wide super powerful beam that will cut the eye and sever the optic nerve.



:neener:
 
Have any of the anti-gun discussion boards gotten a hold of this article yet? It'd be interesting to see their reactions.

The most fascinating contrast thus far: the article on the Marine sniper in Iraq with some score of confirmed kills on insurgent ambushers and IED-layers:

THR = "good job from a well-trained individual"

DU: "He should be locked up immediately and given constant psychiatric observation before he comes back to America and starts slaughtering dark-skinned people with a machine gun!""

Any DU-haunters on this board? No need to mention your DU handle, I understand that you operate covertly *grin*.

-MV
 
How do you use a laser to do this?

I _assume_ that you would use a laser detection device to try to find a sniper that was using a laser rangefinder. You can't normally see them except for the very brief little dot. But with the right tools you could backtrack them right back to where they came from. I would expect a really sophisticated sniper to avoid such "active" tools. Those why we have mildot scopes!

Gregg
 
How do you use a laser to do this?
It doesn't say they use lasers, it says they use laser detection devices.

I'm guessing any sniper worth his salt these days is using a laser range-finder. Makes sense that being able to detect when you're being ranged would be an important capability.

[edit]Hmmm... I was a little too slow on the trigger there. ;)[/edit]
 
Shooting people at 75 meters through a hole in the trunk of a car like the two goofballs up in the D.C. area does not a sniper make,,,,,,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top