is .357 the new 9mm?

Status
Not open for further replies.
leading is not that hard to get out??? right?just shoot a few FMJ thought it

That is an extremely bad idea.

https://www.shootingtimes.com/editorial/ammunition_st_lowdownleadfoul_201002/99962

Here ya go fellas!
that’s Cool!

I want to do this! my 17L with Comp should work that .357 good!

There are better choices than the .960 Rowland, IMO.

9mm +P.
9mm +P+.
356 TSW.
If you handload, load 9 Major if your barrel has enough chamber support.

Testing the 960: https://www.firearmsnews.com/editorial/960-rowland-review/77904
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Na- I’ll stick with the real deal … 357!magnum

Geo
Any hunting details to share? Experiences with that 200gr

More info please and … photos ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
alright, I thought 960 Roland was a conversation that turn your Glock to shoot .357 magnum

WRONG!
 
Not a fan of- Yet Years ago, Many Touted the 41 mag as the Officers Sidearm…. stepping up the game from 357 mag.
I'm not so sure about that, Lnf Crzr. The way I've heard it is a few folks like Elmer Keith were pushing the 41 Mag for an Officer's sidearm, but most of those folks, including Elmer, were disappointed with final product - the revolvers chambered for .41 Mag were too big and heavy, and the .41 Mag was overly powerful for the average LEO.
Please don't get me wrong though - I love the .41 Mag, and for backwoods carry, I'll take it over a .357 Mag any day of the week. For that matter, the only thing I have against my Model 69 Smith (an L-frame .44 Mag) is that it's not a .41 Mag.;)
 
Last edited:
Geo
Any hunting details to share? Experiences with that 200gr

More info please and … photos ?
It’s a close range hole puncher. Works good on wild pigs and deer within 50yds. Past 50, you’ll be following a blood trail. I recommend starting at 13.5gr of 2400 work up to a load you can point shoot into a pie plate at 25yds. Nerf soccer balls are good for getting it down pat, in my experience. Wish we had those 40 years ago.
 
Geo
Any hunting details to share? Experiences with that 200gr

More info please and … photos ?
I also load it up with Unique in.38Spl for really close range pigs and vermin hunting.
index.php

I don’t have my load books out. It’s bedtime for me but I can look it up tomorrow night after work. If I recall I didn’t stray too far from the Lymans 45th Ed maximum load data. I been using the same loads for decades using custom scoops.
 
It’s just something I seen- dosnt interest me at all in the lease amount. A sad attempt at marketing off the Great track record of the 357 magnum. Very similar to the 357 Sig attempt.

Very cool Geo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It’s just something I seen- dosnt interest me at all in the lease amount. A sad attempt at marketing off the Great track record of the 357 magnum. Very similar to the 357 Sig attempt.
I like Sig 357! but that conversation is not putting a rim .357 in the chamber of a 9mm
 
E3D29E3C-2353-4480-90F6-E6091487CC4E.jpeg
Very cool Geo.
Now see this is why I don’t quote loads from memory. What I gave you was the maximum load - as in .357Maximum.
I load them up every couple of years - for a 22” rifle barrel. Not every couple of weeks for any kind of handgun. I’ll get out my hunting loads. They have correct data on the box tags.
 
View attachment 1028455
Now see this is why I don’t quote loads from memory. What I gave you was the maximum load - as in .357Maximum.
I load them up every couple of years - for a 22” rifle barrel. Not every couple of weeks for any kind of handgun. I’ll get out my hunting loads. They have correct data on the box tags.
I always wanted to shoot that! 3 years ago, a shop had new .357 Max brass for $.30 a piece, that’s when everything was cheap. Should have picked it up

That's impossible. You don't really understand ammo and guns that well.
are you British too?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Why is the 357 considered “Barley capable to hunt deer”

Do you think it’s becouse it’s ammos been watered down over the years?

Do you think it’s Because of other larger cartridges overshadowing it

Or do you think it’s simply Weak?
 
Why is the 357 considered “Barley capable to hunt deer”

Do you think it’s becouse it’s ammos been watered down over the years?

Do you think it’s Because of other larger cartridges overshadowing it

Or do you think it’s simply Weak?

I think it a combination of water down cheap factory ammo, and much of the non-water-downed ammo is relatively light for caliber for self-defense rather than hunting. I would rather have 158-180gr for hunting than the ~110-130gr stuff you see favored for self-defense/duty.

But if you have shot enough deer with 357 Magnum (or similar energy levels) and then shot enough deer with 44 Mag and similar big bore revolver cartridges you realize how much more forgiving the big bores are. 357 Magnum does just fine with good shots but there are marginal shots for 357 Magnum that might result in a lost deer or long tracking, those same shots with the big bores result in DRT. Assuming you can shoot the big bores well, they are more forgiving to minor error on shot placement and/or bad angles on the deer.
 
Last edited:
I think it a combination of water down cheap factory ammo, and much of the non-water-downed ammo is relatively light for caliber for self-defense rather than hunting. I would rather have 158-180gr for hunting than the ~110-130gr stuff you see favored for self-defense/duty.

But if you have shot enough deer with 357 Magnum (or similar energy levels) and then shot enough deer with 44 Mag and similar big bore revolver cartridges you realize how much more forgiving the big bores are. 357 Magnum does just fine with good shots but there are marginal shots for 357 Magnum that might result in a lost deer or long tracking, those same shots with the big bores result in DRT. Assuming you can shoot the big bores well, they are more forgiving to minor error on shot placement and/or bad angles on the deer.
Add the sight in for opening day crowd missing or making poor shots.
 
I think it a combination of water down cheap factory ammo, and much of the non-water-downed ammo is relatively light for caliber for self-defense rather than hunting. I would rather have 158-180gr for hunting than the ~110-130gr stuff you see favored for self-defense/duty.

But if you have shot enough deer with 357 Magnum (or similar energy levels) and then shot enough deer with 44 Mag and similar big bore revolver cartridges you realize how much more forgiving the big bores are. 357 Magnum does just fine with good shots but there are marginal shots for 357 Magnum that might result in a lost deer or long tracking, those same shots with the big bores result in DRT. Assuming you can shoot the big bores well, they are more forgiving to minor error on shot placement and/or bad angles on the deer.
That's exactly why .444Marlin and .45-70Gov't outsell .30-30 and .243 every deer season.

Except, they don't. Give some thought to WHY .30-30 is still in the top-10 or better most popular deer cartridges in the US before disagreeing.

"Vista Outdoor, which manufactures both Federal and Remington ammunition, reports that .30-30 ammo is still a big-volume item. The cartridge consistently ranks in or near the top 10 in annual ammo sales.." https://www.realtree.com/brow-tines-and-backstrap/has-the-30-30-really-killed-the-most-deer

The recoil, muzzle blast, weight of the firearm, and portability all lend themselves to the .357, NOT the .44 - and I'm a Ruger SBH + M77/44 owner and hunter. The 44mag does plenty of damage and that's part of the problem. I want meat, not a trophy. Trophy hunters might prefer a handgun that rips rib meat to shreds but I don't.

Handguns aren't ideal for hunting to begin with. I use a .35Rem Marlin 336T when I have the option. A .30-30 Marlin 336C when I know the range will be flatter and longer. Handguns are for tight quarters, riding, 4-wheelers, swamp brush, and walking trails/fence-lines. The only time a handgun is better than a rifle is chasing coyotes, pigs, and/or wounded deer through thickets, around watering holes, through kudzu, into the palmetto patches... places where a rifle is just too unwieldy. When I do hunt with a handgun deliberately, it's a .357 - either a 6-1/2" Ruger Blackhawk or a 4" Colt Lawman - because they handle faster, point easier, holster more easily, carry lighter, don't over-lead, and the recoil is easier to manage if I get off-balance than a 300gr Sierra out of a SBH - but that's a good load for blinds and tree stands in thick pine. I hunt year-round, mostly on private land, use rifles WAY more than handguns and like to keep a full freezer - which is why I'm not going out this season. Wife says we can't buy another freezer, no place to put it. :(
 
Why is the 357 considered “Barley capable to hunt deer”
It isn't. Not by hunters. Maybe by wanna-be's and pretend posers but the people like me who put meat in the freezer consider it about the best all-around pig and whitetail getter around - IF you're going to use a handgun. Personally, I still prefer the .35Rem - which any gun rag cowboy will tell you is as incapable and outdated as the .30-30 and .357 - but it still puts meat on the table. So does the .30-30.
 
That's exactly why .444Marlin and .45-70Gov't outsell .30-30 and .243 every deer season.

Except, they don't. Give some thought to WHY .30-30 is still in the top-10 or better most popular deer cartridges in the US before disagreeing.

"Vista Outdoor, which manufactures both Federal and Remington ammunition, reports that .30-30 ammo is still a big-volume item. The cartridge consistently ranks in or near the top 10 in annual ammo sales.." https://www.realtree.com/brow-tines-and-backstrap/has-the-30-30-really-killed-the-most-deer

The recoil, muzzle blast, weight of the firearm, and portability all lend themselves to the .357, NOT the .44 - and I'm a Ruger SBH + M77/44 owner and hunter. The 44mag does plenty of damage and that's part of the problem. I want meat, not a trophy. Trophy hunters might prefer a handgun that rips rib meat to shreds but I don't.

Handguns aren't ideal for hunting to begin with. I use a .35Rem Marlin 336T when I have the option. A .30-30 Marlin 336C when I know the range will be flatter and longer. Handguns are for tight quarters, riding, 4-wheelers, swamp brush, and walking trails/fence-lines. The only time a handgun is better than a rifle is chasing coyotes, pigs, and/or wounded deer through thickets, around watering holes, through kudzu, into the palmetto patches... places where a rifle is just too unwieldy. When I do hunt with a handgun deliberately, it's a .357 - either a 6-1/2" Ruger Blackhawk or a 4" Colt Lawman - because they handle faster, point easier, holster more easily, carry lighter, don't over-lead, and the recoil is easier to manage if I get off-balance than a 300gr Sierra out of a SBH - but that's a good load for blinds and tree stands in thick pine. I hunt year-round, mostly on private land, use rifles WAY more than handguns and like to keep a full freezer - which is why I'm not going out this season. Wife says we can't buy another freezer, no place to put it. :(

You sort of went off on a tangent here; it has nothing to do with sales. 444 Marlin and 45/70 are both more forgiving to minor errors in shot placement and bad shot angles than 30-30 and 243 Win in much the same way 44 Mag, 454 and other big bore revolver cartridges are more forgiving to minor errors in shot placement and bad shot angles than 357 Magnum. This is true despite the sales numbers and is not so say the smaller caliber don't have other advantage over the big bores.

I have hunted deer with everything from 410 slugs to 450 Bushmaster and 12 gauge slugs and with handguns. The big bores are dramatically more forgiving to minor errors in shot placement and bad/difficult shot angles than the small bores. This is but one aspect of deer hunting...
 
Add the sight in for opening day crowd missing or making poor shots.
That crowd would still miss or wound and loose deer independent of firearms used. You can buy yourself some margin for error by stepping up to larger bores and greater energy cartridges but that only buys you so much. No amount of "big-gun" can will make up for poor shooting.
 
You sort of went off on a tangent here; it has nothing to do with sales. 444 Marlin and 45/70 are both more forgiving to minor errors in shot placement and bad shot angles than 30-30 and 243 Win in much the same way 44 Mag, 454 and other big bore revolver cartridges are more forgiving to minor errors in shot placement and bad shot angles than 357 Magnum. This is true despite the sales numbers and is not so say the smaller caliber don't have other advantage over the big bores.

I have hunted deer with everything from 410 slugs to 450 Bushmaster and 12 gauge slugs and with handguns. The big bores are dramatically more forgiving to minor errors in shot placement and bad/difficult shot angles than the small bores. This is but one aspect of deer hunting...
I respectfully disagree. 40+ years with everything from .22Short to .44Magnum hunting deer, gators, pigs, snakes, possum, coyotes, racoons, and about anything else you can eat or need to keep from eating you says the .357Magnum is skilled hands is far better for hunting - especially if eating is your intent - than a .44Magnum or larger. Maybe it's not IDPA, IPSC, USPS, etc. billion-round-a-year steel-plate plinking load better but it's far better if want a decent meal and know how to hit what you want to hit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top