Read it again.So you would ignore them?
That would depend upon what it was that they said.Or consider what they said as valid?
No. No one can predict what will happen in a criminal attack.So it would depend on what scenario they presented?
Their choice. of course.Do you feel that members here that carry revolvers may ignore your input?
But my input is based on quite a bit of objective reasoning., and I am by no means alone in having considered a bit more than "I feel comfortable" and "in most cases".....
At least they should think very carefully about relying upon five shots for their continued existence.
Those who may not like the assumptions that JohnKSa used in his eye-opening analysis are free to insert their own, assuming that they understand the math. It's basic statistics.
However, everyone should understand that they represent best case scenarios. They assume that a defender will stop shooting immediately after having fired the shot that effects a stop.
That, of course, is entirely unrealistic, but it really does simplify the calculations considerably.
Other than that simplification, I'm happy with the assumptions.
I'll just round up a bit. There's enough uncertainty anyway.