Deanimator
Member
You seem to be the only one here portraying gunowners in that light.No, it was a condescending dig at those in our community who think that because they carry a gun they are the last line of defense between civilization and anarchy and generally reinforce the stereotypr the antis try to portray us as a bunch of uneducated, unsophisticated, trigger happy bumpkins who live in homes that look like bunkers, wear camouflage clothing and marry our cousins.
Let me suggest that this is because you live in the same state as the wouldbe perpetrator, a state which ENFORCES a DUTY to be a victim of violent crime, frequently with a VENGEANCE.
As originally described by you, there was NO potential for anything besides the terrorist killing HIMSELF among others, with fragments of a grenade and of any receptacle in which he placed it. And I will stand by that assessment all day long. All you've done is to claim he could do it, without any plausible mechanism for doing so. If for whatever reason you decline to justify your claim, you should do everyone the courtesy of withdrawing it.
But then by all appearances, the reference to garbage cans was merely a device by which you could badmouth those whom you resent because they have rights you don't possess. If that's how you really feel, you should just come out and say so.