I'm surprised to see BATFE apologists in here. I wasn't around, but correct me if I'm wrong. In the early 60s you could buy a firearm anywhere. No paperwork. No incompetent tax ninjas sniffing over every serial number, time, date, and checkbox on a form. You could buy 'em through the mail.
Wait, wait, wait.
Let's be very clear hear. Under our system of government, the branch that passes the laws - the legislative branch - is separate from the the branch that enforces the laws - the executive branch.
That means that it is the responsibility of the executive branch to enforce the laws that have been passed by the legislature. The BATFE is part of the executive branch, not the legislative branch. So they are not responsible for change in gun laws since the fabled 1960's. Look to the legislative branch for that. Once Congress passes a law, it is up to the executive branch to enforce that law.
The executive branch does not pass legislation.
The separation of powers under our Constitution is - to my mind - a very good thing. It is one of the fundamental checks on tyranny the Founding Fathers built into our Constitution. In many ways, it is more fundamental than the Bill of Rights - as it is in the body of the Constitution, not an amendment.
Are you arguing that we should dissolve the Constitution, and remove the separation of powers? Should the BATFE be responsible for both legislation and enforcement? That sounds like a
bad idea to me. A really, really bad idea.
I would rather maintain the Constitution - but that means that the BATFE can only be dinged for errors in enforcement, not errors in legislation.
If you disagree with the legislation, talk to Congress!
Mike