Waitone
Member
Airlines drag their feed on armed pilots, etc. because of the high probability of liability suits should something untoward happen. I doubt seriously pressure hull failure is a major concern.
Modern aircraft have back up systems out the ying-yang; electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic, mechanical, and transparent aluminum. My brudder in law years ago flew C-9's (mil version of a DC-9) for the air farce. One time on vacation I got to thumb through the pilots manuals. I was surprised to see the backup systems that backed up back up systems. The one I remember is the nose gear had 9 separate means from lowering the landing gear. . . .the last system was a hand crank at the base of pilot's seat.
I have heard that sintered rounds like Glaser Safety Slugs (IIRC) will not penetrate a pressure hull but will do a number on the human body.
Modern aircraft have back up systems out the ying-yang; electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic, mechanical, and transparent aluminum. My brudder in law years ago flew C-9's (mil version of a DC-9) for the air farce. One time on vacation I got to thumb through the pilots manuals. I was surprised to see the backup systems that backed up back up systems. The one I remember is the nose gear had 9 separate means from lowering the landing gear. . . .the last system was a hand crank at the base of pilot's seat.
I have heard that sintered rounds like Glaser Safety Slugs (IIRC) will not penetrate a pressure hull but will do a number on the human body.