From what I recall of the various Military, FBI and other law enforcement trials I read about, the Sig 226 came out on top with the Beretta 92 in second. CZ bowed out fairly early, and glock did so-so, as I recall.
Didn't Glock refuse to enter into the military competition under the stipulated conditions or something like that?
If Glock only did so-so how did they win the FBI's standard sidearm contract instead of Beretta or Sig?
I don't buy that super special discount story. Beretta I know gives discounts for bulk purchases and I would not be surprised if Sig does too. It's not at all uncommon.
Of couse the fact that Glock makes a pretty good handgun is really rather superfluous, right?Glock got where it is in the industry by making whatever wierd little mods departments wanted, and undercutting *anybody*.
Of couse the fact that Glock makes a pretty good handgun is really rather superfluous, right?
no, that Glock makes good Pistols and sells them for cheap (*) is the reason they win many contracts.
Thats almost as bad as folks paying $1000+ for an AK right now. OUCH!btw the rest of the world has to pay hell for Glock Pistols, 1000+ for a Glock.. yeah .. right..
now if you just look at the Slide and the Slide only, then yes, a Glock will probably win, but you will replace the entire rest of the Pistol twice or more times before you reach the 200k round mark.
sanerkeki said:I have fired at least 100k bullets threw it and never not once did it jam.