No argument there--NONE at all. The undesirable reaction would be blurting something out loudly in public. That could easily be a normal reaction to unusual stress.Unfortunately, stress often does promote undesireable reactions
However WHAT she said is not a product of the stress--WHAT she said was in there already--just waiting for an excuse to come out. Clearly, it's not possible for stress to suddenly create in her an antipathy toward his carry behavior in the instant that she discovered he was carrying. WHAT she said was a product of internal issues unrelated to the stress of the moment that caused them to be suddenly revealed.
Whether she consciously set out to humiliate or intimidate him is, perhaps questionable--it's very difficult to say what a person's motives are with 100% accuracy. However, the fact that she did and then repeated it after a relatively brief interval is strong evidence that this tactic is a pattern of behavior. And that's very worrisome. That's not a constructive tactic to employ in a relationship. I'm willing to bet that if the original poster was truly honest with himself and us he would admit that either she or one of her parents frequently (or at least habitually) uses this approach.
Agreed-- my comment was poorly stated. I should have said that while guns provided the focus of the disagreement this time, the tactic she used was more disturbing than her apparent issues with guns.Hawkmoon said:I think it IS about guns. The first incident, well maybe we could write it off as surprise ... even though she certainly should have been smart/adult enough to hold the comment/question until later.
And, finally, I have to agree with Mr. Ross. While his comments are more "big picture" than mine, his facts are indisputable. And, as 444 says, the courting days are the best (in terms of behavior) things typically go downhill from there.