NC: "No Guns" BBQ Eatery gets Robbed
A BBQ joint in North Carolina with a "No guns" sign gets robbed. Surely now, that never happens....There are some interesting ironies here, please read on.
The irony is that " the Pitt BBQ’s other location in Raleigh was where national gun control advocates Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly held their meeting to have a “dialogue with gun owners”… to which no gun owners were invited.”
Now why would Gabby and her tour have a “dialogue with gun owners” but no gun owners were invited? Is she just an concerned public figure? Or someone with an agenda?
I also find it interesting that the article flat out calls Gabby and friend "national gun control advocates" instead of just 'concerned public figures who just want people to be responsible with guns' (as the media often portrays Gabby).
Could I be safe in my assumption that perhaps Gabby and her 'tour' might have had some input into the 'Pitt's' anti-gun stance?
I wonder if the owners called Gabby and asked her why were they robbed and what went wrong. Golly, I guess the criminals were just disadvantaged because they could not read. Darned public school system.....
Perhaps the owners will come to their senses and are rethinking their no guns policy. But I am not holding my breath.........
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/21/robbers-ignore-no-weapons-sign-nc-restaurant-assau/
“The Pit BBQ was robbed at gunpoint? Wait, that’s not possible; The Pitt posted signs prohibiting guns. We all know that armed criminals will avoid places that prohibit guns, right?
You know, maybe Chipotle's, Jack In The Box and Starbucks should read this article.
.
A BBQ joint in North Carolina with a "No guns" sign gets robbed. Surely now, that never happens....There are some interesting ironies here, please read on.
The irony is that " the Pitt BBQ’s other location in Raleigh was where national gun control advocates Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly held their meeting to have a “dialogue with gun owners”… to which no gun owners were invited.”
Now why would Gabby and her tour have a “dialogue with gun owners” but no gun owners were invited? Is she just an concerned public figure? Or someone with an agenda?
I also find it interesting that the article flat out calls Gabby and friend "national gun control advocates" instead of just 'concerned public figures who just want people to be responsible with guns' (as the media often portrays Gabby).
Could I be safe in my assumption that perhaps Gabby and her 'tour' might have had some input into the 'Pitt's' anti-gun stance?
I wonder if the owners called Gabby and asked her why were they robbed and what went wrong. Golly, I guess the criminals were just disadvantaged because they could not read. Darned public school system.....
Perhaps the owners will come to their senses and are rethinking their no guns policy. But I am not holding my breath.........
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/21/robbers-ignore-no-weapons-sign-nc-restaurant-assau/
“The Pit BBQ was robbed at gunpoint? Wait, that’s not possible; The Pitt posted signs prohibiting guns. We all know that armed criminals will avoid places that prohibit guns, right?
You know, maybe Chipotle's, Jack In The Box and Starbucks should read this article.
.