No FN five seven's for Boston

Status
Not open for further replies.

depicts

Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2005
Messages
329
Well, here's todays front page anti gun story. We're back to "It's not for hunting or sporting use"....that's for sure and "no one wants a gun that can shoot through the vest of a police officer...certianly not the average citizen',

I don't want this kind of gun myself, as I prefer old single actions and nice wooden stocked Smith and Wesssons, but here we go again blaming the gun for what CRIMINALS are doing.

Read it and be glad you don't live in Massachusetts.

Boston police warn of vest-piercing gun
High-powered weapon on streets
By Suzanne Smalley, Globe Staff | February 18, 2006

The Boston Police Department is sounding the alarm that a new type of high-powered handgun is on the streets that fires rounds police say can pierce many kinds of bulletproof vests worn by officers.

Breaking News Alerts The department issued a safety alert to officers after two men were shot with the gun in Dorchester and Mattapan last week. The alert, obtained by the Globe, warned that the FN Five-Seven handgun fires the bullets at such a velocity that they ''will punch through your vest, PLATE included."

Yesterday, officers of all ranks expressed concern that the weapon has surfaced in Boston.

''These aren't recreational weapons," Police Commissioner Kathleen M. O'Toole said in an interview. ''This is an example of a gun designed to kill people."

Added one rank-and-file officer: ''The ability to go through a vest . . . it's just way too dangerous. It's real scary."

Related:
GLOBE GRAPHIC: New handgun on the block
For more information on the gun, go to http://www.fnherstal.com/html/Index.htm and click on
'Small arms' > 'Handguns' > 'Five-seveN'

''It's dangerous as it is," said the officer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he did not have department permission to speak to the media. ''It just gets compounded with something like that. Your fear level is increased a whole lot more, because the vest that you're wearing is obsolete."

The gun, manufactured by FN Herstal, was first sold in the United States in early 2004. It began appearing in US cities in late 2004, said Gene Voegtlin, the legislative counsel for the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Around the same time, the federal Department of Homeland Security sent out a warning about the gun and ammunition.

The gun is about the same size as the .40-caliber Glock handgun that Boston police use. It is sold to the public, and a slightly different version is sold to the military and law enforcement agencies. The major difference is in the ammunition.

The bullets sold to the military and law enforcement have a steel-hardened tip, making them able to penetrate thicker body armor. Company officials said that the sale of this type of ammunition is tightly regulated.

The bullets available to the public do not have an armor-piercing tip and are designed to fragment upon impact, making them less powerful. Company officials said that while the commercially available ammunition can in rare cases penetrate some body armor used by law enforcement, these bullets cannot pierce other models of bulletproof vests.

Rick DeMilt -- director of sales and marketing for FNH-USA, the US subsidiary of FN Herstal -- said the gun found by Boston police is sold for sporting purposes, such as hunting and competitive sports shooting. It is unclear which kind of ammunition was found by Boston police.

''All guns are dangerous; this one is of particular concern because of the high-powered ammunition," O'Toole said. Officers, she said, should ''be on the lookout" for the weapon.

Officers were not involved in the shootings last week. An internal police intelligence report obtained by the Globe said it was not clear whether the same gun was used in both episodes. The document said that the victim in one shooting was hit multiple times and taken to the hospital in critical condition. Neither shooting has become a homicide, police said yesterday.

The gun has caught the attention of officials in several other cities. In Washington, D.C., last year, police officials joined the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence to decry the availability of the weapon. ''We're certainly deeply concerned about a weapon on the street that could be so potentially lethal," District of Columbia Police spokesman Officer Kenny Bryson said yesterday.

US Representative Christopher Shays of Connecticut sent a letter to US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives officials last year inquiring about the gun, which he said he was ''very concerned" to learn had been seized by police in Trumbull, Conn.

DeMilt said Massachusetts is the only state in the country where his company does not legally sell any of the FN Five-Seven guns or ammunition to the public.

The gun's magazine usually holds 20 bullets, more than those of many handguns, and the sale of ones like it is illegal in Massachusetts.

Company officials defend the gun and said that, when used with the ammunition sold to the public, it is similar to many other handguns on the market. DeMilt said that his company cannot be responsible for illegal sales of the more lethal bullets designed for military and police use.

FN Herstal also makes the pepper-pellet gun that Boston police shelved after Red Sox fan Victoria Snelgrove was shot and killed in October 2004. Her family is suing the firm, and if the Snelgroves win, the city, as part of its wrongful death settlement with the family, would share the award.

Voegtlin said the guns should be illegal everywhere. ''Weapons that don't serve a legitimate hunting or sporting purpose and are designed to defeat or penetrate the body armor worn by police officers don't belong in our communities," he said.

Sid Heal, a tactical operations specialist and commander with the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department who has handled the gun, said that the weapon is very powerful, even with bullets available to the public.

Heal also questioned why any company would sell bullets that can pierce body armor. ''What does a person need a pistol that can penetrate a vest for?" Heal said. ''I can tell you the average citizen doesn't."

Andrew Arulanandam, a National Rifle Association spokesman, said that the answer is not to make weapons illegal, but to better police the criminals who use them. ''If these crimes are being perpetrated by criminals who already have an existing record then they should not be in possession of any firearm or any ammunition," he said.

But Heal said the gun is dangerous and difficult to control because of its small size and high power.

''It goes so fast and it's penetrating because the round is so small," Heal said. ''There's rounds that go faster and there's rounds that are more penetrating, but none that I know of that come out of pistols. They come out of rifles."

Suzanne Smalley can be reached at [email protected].

© Copyright 2006 Globe Newspaper Company.
 
"Added one rank-and-file officer: ''The ability to go through a vest . . . it's just way too dangerous. It's real scary."

Wait'll they find out that anything that fires 7.62x25, like a C&R CZ-52 or Tokarev, can do the same thing.

Probably ban those, too!

Also,

"Heal also questioned why any company would sell bullets that can pierce body armor. ''What does a person need a pistol that can penetrate a vest for?" Heal said.

How about stopping a going-postal nutcase or possibly a home-invasion robber or that's wearing body armor? What, criminals can't buy the stuff off eBay? Hello!
 
False issue

The FN 5-7 is not legal for sale in MASSACHUSETTS; never mind Boston.

First, it is not on the Approved Firearms Roster.

Second, even if it were so approved, it could not be sold w/20-round mags. FN would have to supply 10-rounders for the Mass. market.

In short, another fabrication by the Menino contingent to distract attention from the climbing crime rate in Boston, especially in the non-caucasian communities. :barf:
 
Th family of that girl is suing the manufacturer? What the heck? Would they sue Ford if a drunk-driver hit their car?

And does anyone have more information on those 2 people shot with 5.7's? Would be very interesting to start compiling database of the cartridge, terminal ballistics and such. If they release which cartridge it was. ...Still, not the astounding results touted before, where bullets would go through barriers and slice a human heart in half...
 
Reminds me of the AWB arguments we used to make. Always arguing that they are no more effective than the next. This is true, but we're making the politically correct, whitewashed, less incindiary argument.


The REAL truth is that the 2nd Amendment protects the very concept of having weapons that are effective against authorities. 2nd Amendment isn't about home-defense from criminals, or hunting. It's number one purpose is to arm the citizenry against the establishment/government. The other purposes are secondary.


Unfortunately, that's too scary of a concept these days. People are brainwashed into trusting/loving the government. Like in the draft-thread, the government has created a parent/child relationship with the civilian population through years of government-run education. Goes hand-in-hand with the welfare state. These days, it seems everyone, even wealthy people, always whine to the government to "get things done"...There's a government solution to every problem is the idea at work.


A society that thinks like that can never accept the idea that being armed is in preperation or defense or deterrance from an aggressive tyrannical government is acceptable. It is quite undermining. Why would you ever own a gun just in case the very entity that gives you so much and you trust so much might come to get you one day?


So, as for the five-seven, it is one of the very few arms that is TRULY what I call a "2nd Amendment" firearm. I call any gun that is designed specifically for certain uses to be "2nd Amendment" guns. Like any 50BMG....Whatever is designed specifically to defeat the defenses of body armor, armored vehicles, rapid fire weapons etc...Your grandpa's shotgun isn't much of a "2nd Amendment" firearm...It might have been, back in 1820....


Gist of my post - if it is designed to kill cops, soldiers, mercenaries, taxmen, authorities - it is something that is VERY American to own. It should be desired by all. It shouldn't be taboo or bad or evil. It should be championed and respected. Neighbors should pat each other on the back when one obtains a more effective means for exterminating tyrants. For owning such things DOES NOT CREATE AN INTENT TO USE.
 
I'll be that round would be pure-dee Hell on prairie dogs, assuming the rifle becomes available. Or is it?

And of course they interview the one Boston cop who's more worried about the 5.7 than the turd who's wielding it.:cuss:
 
So let me get this straight...

My Daughter is shot and killed by Boston Police......... So I sue FN Herstal??????

That Makes Perfect sense.:)

(rude comments removed by Oleg)

I'm starting to think that if you're a gun company you should stick to only selling to Military and Individual Civilians.

Selling to City PD's (especially Boston, NY, and Chicago) is just too much liability..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Specifically about the Five-Seven,

Forgive me if I make any technical errors - please correct me if I am wrong.

Anyway you try and justify it - it was designed specifically to defeat body armor. The military/police ammunition is illegal to own because it has a steel-core AP penetrator. Thing is, the cartridge was designed with more than one form of AP characteristic. Even with the civvie ammo available, small bullet diameter, as well as high velocity - works as a "vest-buster" regardless of bullet design in this cartridge.


Total hypothetical situation here. Our government becomes tyrannical. Say, like the Nazis of the 1930's. It is safe to say that the strong-arm of this tyranny will be the law-enforcement establishment. [please, no flames here - we all saw New Orleans]. These authorities WILL be wearing body armor. Either type IIa or IIIa.


If you had to engage them in self-defense against unjustfied arrest, imprisonment, or from extermination - your 45acp, 9mm, 38spl, 357 are all OBSOLETE. Preferably, you'd need to be using an AK, AR, M1A, FAL, M1 or whatever your fancy is. Unfortunately, you can't easily carry one of those around society or easily wield one from a car as you could a high-capacity pistol. It is out and about in society where "they" prefer to prey on you.

You have to compromise. I know you all want and like your 230gr .45acp's...but they are obsolete. They will not penetrate. They will knock the wind out of someone, but they won't take them out of the fight. In fights, ranges are short, 0ft to 21ft typical with 75ft max. At such ranges, speed is KING. You will not be making headshots unless you are Jerry Milucek (sp?)...You will be going for torso shots. Which are bigger and easier to hit in a defense scenario. They also contain the vitals needed to be hit for incapacitation.


The tiny Five-Seven ammo isn't a great round, but it at least "gets you in the game" by giving you the ability to actually wound the "opponent" in a serious way. And step 1 is body armor penetration. It's a compromise. It is a "work around" solution to a "problem"...


I know that isn't very politically correct, but oh well. Again, no one is discussing fighting the police or government. Only discussing the effectiveness of arms as DETERRENTS. And as we all know, for deterrents to be deterrents - they must work IF needed.
 
The gun needs to be banned because it's so deadly. Yet neither of the victims in Boston died, even the once hit multiple times. :rolleyes:

Typical Boston media drivel. The 5.7 round is way overrated anyway.
 
It might be over rated, but it's better to penetrate the vest than to not. So that's like saying the 9mm and .45acp are over rated also.


This is just the natural historical cycle repeating itself. At one time in man's history, knights roamed around and did whatever they wanted because they had a monopoly on armor, swords and the skills/training with such weapons. Feudal lords had the power to tax, abuse, rape and do whatever they wanted because they had knights as their strongmen. If you were a serf working a lord's land, the lord had the right to have sexual intercourse with your newly wed wife first. Don't think our "modern" society is morally above such behavior. If anything, our leaderships are capable of much worse due to our faithless society - just look at the 20th century and the mass wantonness slaughter of people. We might be more educated, have fancy modern toys, but our humanity has not evolved from the barbarians we all once were.


Our great nation has been the greatest and only spurt of freedom in mankind's history because of ONE and only ONE factor that made it all possible -- in our nation, the balance of power, in terms of the ability to project effective lethal force - was tilted towards the citizenry, not the authorities. Not any more, and why we are far less free than ever.


Today the feudal lords are politicians, and the knights are agents/officers. They are headed back towards the days of armor. If we cannot create a deterrence or be able to take them out, then as time goes on they will surely abuse their power (and they already are). Even our military is leaning towards armor. Current body armor is VERY impressive. This is why the Russians and Chinese are planning their future arms to not emphasize on terminal performance, but on penetration and armor piercing.


The 5.7 isn't special and isn't a wonder bullet - but it's better than nothing. In reality, we shouldn't have to deal with things like that 5.7, instead, we should have AP .45 or AP 9mm and AP .308 and AP 5.56. But that's another story.


It is always, always, always in the authorities best interest to remove any threat that faces them, regardless of whether or not their deeds are justified or evil. It makes tax collection easier. It makes serving warrants easier. It makes confiscations easier. It makes eminent domain seizures easier....


You see what I am getting at. It's a sad day when all we have left to defend is small-caliber, high-velocity pistol cartridges to achieve a round-about form of armor penetration.
 
Quick lesson in law

"My Daughter is shot and killed by Boston Police......... So I sue FN Herstal??????"

YES, if the death is due to:

1. Defective design (i.e., does not shoot where aimed because of poor sight system;

2. Defective manual and/or warnings (poorly written/illustrated so as to confuse/misinform user);

3. Defective manufacture (bad QC); or

4. Defective training by factory personnel (users misinformed).

Not quite as farfetched a lawsuit as this poster seems to think. :scrutiny:
 
Tory said:
"My Daughter is shot and killed by Boston Police......... So I sue FN Herstal??????"

YES, if the death is due to:

1. Defective design (i.e., does not shoot where aimed because of poor sight system;

2. Defective manual and/or warnings (poorly written/illustrated so as to confuse/misinform user);

3. Defective manufacture (bad QC); or

4. Defective training by factory personnel (users misinformed).

Not quite as farfetched a lawsuit as this poster seems to think. :scrutiny:

From what I'd heard of that incident, it seemed to be a case of tacticool-happy cops with their new "nonlethal" toys. In this case, the FN pepper launcher was rather high-velocity, and seemingly marketed for combat-theater useage. It fired a hard plastic ball, and one variant of it mounted on an AR. Boston has since switched to the lower velocity Pepperball, which is pretty much just modified Tippman paintball launchers.

I think the message that needs to be brought out and pounded into every PD is that Cops Are Not Soldiers. They are CIVILIANS with a JOB. Posse Comitatus protects us from soldiers being used as police, and it's just as bad when the police try to become soldiers...but without the training and discipline. The over-tactical-reponse to noncombatants and the excessive usage of air tasers in recent months pretty much illustrate, to me, that some retraining is needed.
 
Dear Tony,

We are real sorry about that tea party problem way back when! And as a token of our remorse, please accept Boston as payment in full. Oh, ok, you drive a hard bargain; you can have Massachusetts too. :D :D :D

Respectfully,

the other 49 (well....almost)
 
No truth is good news.

As stated earlier this pistol is not approved for sale in Mass, and probably will not be, even if it makes it on the State Approved list. The Attorney General under his own consumer protection regulations would deep six it. Anyway, there are no other approved FN handguns on the list so I doubt FN will submit this pistol. Its just more scare tactics by the media to create hysteria about nothing, to further their goals of complete disarmament of Mass gun owners.
 
Don't Tread On Me said:
Reminds me of the AWB arguments we used to make. Always arguing that they are no more effective than the next. This is true, but we're making the politically correct, whitewashed, less incindiary argument.


The REAL truth is that the 2nd Amendment protects the very concept of having weapons that are effective against authorities. 2nd Amendment isn't about home-defense from criminals, or hunting. It's number one purpose is to arm the citizenry against the establishment/government. The other purposes are secondary.


Unfortunately, that's too scary of a concept these days. People are brainwashed into trusting/loving the government. Like in the draft-thread, the government has created a parent/child relationship with the civilian population through years of government-run education. Goes hand-in-hand with the welfare state. These days, it seems everyone, even wealthy people, always whine to the government to "get things done"...There's a government solution to every problem is the idea at work.


A society that thinks like that can never accept the idea that being armed is in preperation or defense or deterrance from an aggressive tyrannical government is acceptable. It is quite undermining. Why would you ever own a gun just in case the very entity that gives you so much and you trust so much might come to get you one day?


So, as for the five-seven, it is one of the very few arms that is TRULY what I call a "2nd Amendment" firearm. I call any gun that is designed specifically for certain uses to be "2nd Amendment" guns. Like any 50BMG....Whatever is designed specifically to defeat the defenses of body armor, armored vehicles, rapid fire weapons etc...Your grandpa's shotgun isn't much of a "2nd Amendment" firearm...It might have been, back in 1820....


Gist of my post - if it is designed to kill cops, soldiers, mercenaries, taxmen, authorities - it is something that is VERY American to own. It should be desired by all. It shouldn't be taboo or bad or evil. It should be championed and respected. Neighbors should pat each other on the back when one obtains a more effective means for exterminating tyrants. For owning such things DOES NOT CREATE AN INTENT TO USE.



This is a very true statement.....Hunting is not protected, but citizens taking out a tryannical government is. If you say this to the average american, they are either too stupid to understand it or dont think that there will ever be an actual need.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top