Non-USA members

Status
Not open for further replies.
I for one, welcome imput from our non-usa members. Perspectives from others is good and broadens our thinking. I've been fortunate to have traveled to many interesting places, such as England, Germany, Austria, China, Singapore, Brazil among others...I had to laugh at this comment below, been to those places too.

I enjoy reading posts from folks from other countries, like New York and California for example......

It helps to have a sense of humor and a thick skin (a tolerance of someone making insensitive comments) when reading posts. As with any society, we have all types of people here. But that's what makes up a society, a variety of opinions, level of education and courtesies. Most rude people when ignored, do get the point. It's the vast variety of people that makes America strong.

I encourage our non-usa members to post comments and participate. From my thinking you are most welcome here.
 
Finnish gunner here. I hate the local gun laws and as soon as my wife graduates from uni we'll start planning moving to the States or some other English speaking country where self defense isn't illegal.

Alaska is probably a great place for you. You'll feel at home weather-wise and we have some of the least restrictive laws concerning firearms and self-defense.
 
Aussie here. THR is the best resource for firearms information that I have found on the internet. In my youth, my grandfather taught me to shoot and he never went anywhere without his pistol. We used to have a rifle range and a rifle club at school. Not any more however.
Although handguns have never really been part of the culture here, rifles - especially the lee enfield .303 - were and still are. System of licenses here lets anyone who wants to own quite a lot but not to carry. I'm one of the few to have a license to carry but that is for work only. Most firearms in this country are made in America but are probably twice as expensive as over there. Despite everything, I believe that Australia has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world. We are jealous of your laws over there.
 
The problem for us here in Europe is that we dont have a "clean slate constitution" in most countries. We havent had a revolution that abolished a tyrannny and entered a new constitution, we only have a number of small reforms. This means that while we have so called free speech, and the ability to vote, our consitution as well as our law is a mishmash of amends, and updates dating back to the thirteenth century at least. The oldest law still in the book and in use in sweden is from the seventeenth century oif my memory serves. This means that at no point have the law stated that "sweden is now no longer a country of subjects, but a country of citizens". The same thing is true regarding its society, at no point have the people risen and said "we are no longer subjects of the crown, but citizens under the flag".
This is seen in the way people think and reason, noone understands the "if there are not a strong enough reason to prohibit something it should be allowed", when i speak about the RKBA issues people look dumbfounded and ask "but why would you need to own a handgun". They never question that it should be prohibited, they never consider that i shouldnt need to motivate my right to keep and bear arms, but rather, they should be made to motivate why i shouldnt be allowed to keep and bear arms.

Unfortunately, in sweden the gunrights are mostly a non issue, even the hunters and shooters are quiet,the just hope that the laws will not be further tightened if they try not to be seen in public.
 
bukijin wrote:
Despite everything, I believe that Australia has one of the highest rates of gun ownership in the world. We are jealous of your laws over there.

Then how do your incredibly strict gun laws survive? I am asking because I am very curious...and not as put down.

Why hasnt a grass-roots movement taken hold and swept aside those restrictive gun laws in your country?
 
btw sprithitler,

I really like your signature...it is a great quote. Where is it from?
It is an old poem, i dont know its origin, but i first found it in the swedish home defenses paper "hemvärnsnytt" back in 1999 or 2000.
I was part of Hemvärnet (the Swedish voluntary homedefense) 1999-2005. During which time i was compelled to keep a fully functional fully automatic Heckler und Koch G3 in the cupboard, while i otherwise am not allowed to keep a firearm unless i take a comprehensive shooting, security and animal recognition exam to keep long arms or proves that i am a member of a shooting club since at least six months and a good competitionshooter to own handguns.
 
What sprit described above is true. Shooters here have no support whatsoever and keep quiet, heads turned down, in hope that the rules will not be made even more restrictive. There's nothing preventing that from happening as such, and if some government representative wanted it bad enough it'd happen and probably with public support if necessary.

It's not even an argument about safety. These people don't agree with the notion that innocent individuals have a supreme right to live unharmed. You can use whatever appeal to emotion you can think of. Their answer will be to stay indoors, get beaten or killed. Get this: they ain't even protesting against this fact. They accept it.

Here, we live by permission. Anything and everything is automatically forbidden unless explicitly permitted. Our so called "rights" are a farce that can be repealed by any force powerful enough, be it a lone politician, the government in general or the majority of voters.

That is why the US was not founded as a democracy (one of the most destructive elements of tyranny in history) but as a Constitutional Republic with inalienable rights that could be taken away neither by political mandate or by vote.

Stranger in a Strange Land? Yeah, that was me.
 
Then how do your incredibly strict gun laws survive?

The constitution does not protect our rights so we have no recourse against anti-gun laws which are passed by parliament.

NSW state now has 2 representatives of the shooters party elected to the upper house. Who are doing a fantastic job for us and are starting to dial back the laws a little.

The gun culture is different here - people own rifles and shotguns much more than handguns. Firearms have historically been used for hunting and vermin control more than for self-defense or warfare in this country. Our wars have been fought overseas and we have no cultural experience of invasion or oppression. It seems to be a much safer place to live than the US.

There is a strong and organized shooting community here but firearms rights are not an issue for the average person.
 
Greetings from Luxembourg :D

I tried German and French forums, but the American ones are a lot better. Most shooters I've met so far (in Luxembourg and elsewhere) are only interested in (to me) boring static bullseye competitions. They have no idea about self defence and practical shooting. And most of them are against carrying concealed firearms for protection if asked:fire:

That's another reason why I like this forum, the American shooters' mind set pretty much mirrors my own ;)

Only today at the range I was told to shoot slower and only put 5 rounds in my magazine. I actually did, but I reloaded so fast that they thought it were 10. Then the range officer told me I should stop doing that too. Holsters and magazine pouches are also forbidden... I'll have to open my own range some day:(
 
a copy of what I wrote about swiss gun laws, in my presentation thread:for those who might have missed it

Swiss law about silencers/suppressors is clear: from 1999, they are forbidden to buy, like the full auto guns. BUT, like the full auto, you can buy them asking for a forbidden guns and accessories permit, which cost 3 times the standard permit for 3 guns (150$ instead of 50$) and you will be given this kind of permit only if you already own a small collection of guns and that you are proved to be reliable.

But silencers/suppressors are LEGAL to OWN and USE if you purchased them before 1999.. (stupid laws..) Same goes for laser aiming devices.

For full auto guns, as i said, you can buy and own them asking for the special permit.. but if you want to shoot them, even only using semi-auto mode, you have to ask a permit for that day, and a defined shooting range, and it will cost you a hundred bucks, only for THAT day... so generally, you only owns full auto's for collection.. and buy semi for shooting.

so if you just fork out the cash (and have proven to be reliable etc) you can still buy and use a suppressor ?

sure, but often it is up to the "bureau" of your "canton" (that is how we call the States of our confederation.. we have 23 of them). In some Canton they give the permit quite easely, in others, they are more reluctant to it.. I dont like it because nothing state clearely who can, and who cannot.. it's just a guy that pick up a decision. For example, in my canton (Geneva), it is not easy.. I have friend that got the permit and the suppressor, but he had a great argument.. it was needed for his .50 sniper rifle, because it was damn loud. Im not sure they would give me a permit for .223 or my glock19 in 9mm... But in some other cantons they give it right away.


and that permit isn't necessary as long as you bought the suppressor before 1999?

yes.. what is forbidden now and from 1999 is not using or owning, but it's buying or selling. What you own before 1999, you can own and use, and no permit (understand as "tax") is required. See mine.


So can you purchase new full auto fire-arms in Switzerland if you have a permit?

Of course you can. Maybe not if you are asking your first permit, but since you have already bought a couple of guns and say that you want to start a full auto collection, there is no reason they would not allow you to have them (if your criminal record is clean, of course) .

the only special rule for full auto, btw, is that you need to have a safe. and you must store the weapon and bolt separately. (bolt in the safe for example). The other "problem" with full's is that sometimes I heard that they come to check to your house, to see f you obey the laws..(but that's not proven to be systematic)

There is no such law for semi. You can store them wherever you want, and even loaded if you'd really want, but you are responsible of it. That means you must make sure that nobody you don't want to can be hurt due to that.
Not really. We don't have such a 2nd amendment here-.

But as you know, we are a direct democracy. Which means we vote at least 3 times a year, on more than 12 subjects. ( a vote can count many subjects)

You disagree with something ? you gather 100 000 signatures from people who agree with you and the law proposition goes under the parlament and than through the national vote.

To win, you need the double majority (people, and Canton (States)) to say YES to you proposition. If you win, the law is adopted.

And, by tradition, in ancient times, people voted on public places (even in the late 70's in some places of Switzerland, see : "landsgemeinde"), in center of villages and towns, rising their hands (no secrecy of vote) in the air and being counted..

And by tradition, they brought their sword/rifle for voting.
Which symbolically meaned.
I am free to vote, and my weapon will ensure that my vote is taken into account !

Beside that background, we have a military militia. Every men should (number of young people avoinding this by many excuses is increasing..) serve 4 months in the army when he is around 20, and than serve 3 weeks a year until he reaches the 3xx days of army (more for officers) or until he reaches 34...

And during all that time, we keep at home all our military equipement, including rifle and ammo (that why my Sig550 is there) .. When we are over with the army, we can still keep our rifle, but will eventually have to pay 100$ to "castrate" the rifle to SEMI only.

That is how things work here.. and as you see, weapons and guns are really "linked" to our tradtions..

Unfortunately, we also have what you call "liberals", who think that they can save us from ourselves, and that think that they can live in a free world, with no danger, no death, no evil, and that use our marvellous democracy to lie to people who have no real knowledge about gun FACTS, and they try this way to restrain our rights, more and more..


Shung,
How do Swiss laws deal with handguns. Can you own, carry openly, carry concealed, etc.?

you can own as many guns (including handguns) as you want (if you are swiss or legally living in Switzerland, that you have no criminal records, and that you are not from certain sensitive countries (ie balkans, south america, turk, those country ask that we give no gun permit to their citizen).

You have 2 ways to get hand gun in Switzerland:

1st: you ask a permit to the gun office of your "canton" (state) ... they will, on the 1st time make a little information about you, and if you are "clean" and than you pay 50$ ,you have a permit to buy 3 guns in the same gunshop of your choice (but gunshops are cool in some places, and they send themself, as they can do it, the guns that you want, if they are in different places, so that you can get them all from the same shop.) The paper work will be done. You will keep a copy, the gunshop will keep one, and will send one to the gun office. That's the main way.

2nd way, is the second hand way, which is also perfectly legal from 1998. If I want to sell a gun for example (we have no distinction for rifle or handguns... they are gun, point. Only single shot rifles or hunting shotgun are easier to get) , I find a buyer. I must check, if I dont know him, that he matches the requirements, being swiss, or legally living here, and that he has no criminal record (we can ask ours for 20$ to the gov) ... If I consider the guy "clean" I can sell him the gun.

We only need to write a 2 pieces contract, in which we will write both our adresses, names, type of gun, caliber and serial number of the gun, date, and we will sign it both.. and than we will each of us, keep a copy of that contract for 10years . That way, the police or the gov, is never informed of the transaction, and this is legal. If a crime is committed with my gun, the police will see who it was sold first, by the gunshop for example, and will find my name.. they will come to check me... At that time, I will show them the contract with the name of the guy I sold the gun to.. and they will go to check that guy.. if the guy sold it also, they will go to check the guy name on the next contract etc etc...

Unfortunately, this law of second hand buisness is going to end at the end of this year. From 2009 we will have to ask the permit to the police, each time we buy a gun, even if its from a second hand and not a gunshop..

We argued that this was stupid, since the present law state that you can throw away your contract after 10 years of owning the gun... the law came in 10 years ago, so when the law will change, many people will destroy they contract on purpose, as they have the right to do it. That way they will prevent their gun to be seized, for whatever reasons the liberals may find in the futur...

Sad to admit, but this will feed the black market.. Collectors, who know each others , like we do, certainly won't ask new permit for second hand buying after 2008, mainly because it would cost 50$ each time.. The simple solution will be to make pre 2009 style contracts, and write a wrong date on it ....

And that how you make respectfull citizens, "criminals", by applying stupid laws..

these guys still think real criminals ask police permit to get guns...

as for carry, concealed or not, it was possible in many states before 1999...

Now its not anymore. To ask for a concelead carry, you must be working as a body guard, or be seriously threaten and proove it, or be very wealthy and say that you fear for your money... Shortly that means only people with a lot of money can afford gun protection.. which is BULL****. I'd rather have a very hard exam to go through (both medically, mentally and technically) but the right to everyone who proove to be capable and responsible to carry a gun, to be authorized to...

The good news is that you can still use your guns for defense when you are in your home/appartement/private land, if you feel that you are enough threatened.


anyway, my great grandfather who made WWI and WW2, used to say : better a good trial than a coffin !
 
I'll add a few legal facts regarding handguns in Sweden if anyone cares:

Minimum age: 18
Crime record: clean or relatively insignificant (speeding ticket etc.)
6 months membership and active practise in a certified handgun club for a .22LR license. Must score 46/50 (5 rds) points in 3 consecutive series at 25 meters with one handed grip + 3 x 40/50 with time limit.

12 months of the same required for calibers above .22LR.

License fee is $100 for the first weapon, rougly $40 for each subsequent weapons.

Guns must be stored in a certified safe weighing at least 330lbs or bolted to the floor/wall if lighter. Licenses are limited to 5 years. To keep ones license, it must be qualified for in the same manner as when it was first obtained.

Added to this are any requirements arbitrarily assigned by the individual gun clubs, such as mandatory participation in competitions and so on.

Knives may not be carried on person unless it's being transported or used for a specific purpose, such as handyman/construction work or in the woods. Guns are not allowed to be carried or used against anyone for any purpose, including defense from mortal danger, by civilians. They must only be transported to and from the range.

Domestic gun dealers are forced to charge very high prices due to import fees, of which the 25% sales/import tax is only one, as well as a constricted market due to "culture" and laws. For example, while $650 is a reasonable price for a new S&W 617 in the US, the cost in Sweden is equal to $1500. A local Desert Eagle would go for about $3660.
 
Last edited:
You have to get killed, yes, or use a firearm if you have one and go to jail. Previous court cases of firearms used for personal defense are almost nonexistant in recent history. Generally, only criminals have guns here due to gun control laws.
 
so what ? you have to get killed ??? what say previous judgments about such cases of firearm use..?
In the cases where the person defending him or herself with a firearm has been freed it has generally been on some Technicality, rather than on the fact that it was selfdefense and thus justified.
 
I'm a lurker around here but I just want say this is a great thread! I'm always interested in hearing the views of international posters!

Carry on!
 
Do any of you guys have national pro-gun organizations (like the NRA) in your countries, or is it mainly local groups? If you don't have anything like this, do you think it would make any difference if you did?

I know our system of government and society must sometimes seem chaotic to you guys. It frequently is, but groups like these can help us stay alert to sneak attacks from the loony left. It's like playing defense in any sport...you have to keep the other team from scoring time after time, but they have to succeed only once. It's like playing whack-a-mole. Sometimes there are moles than there are whacks.

The more I study the history of our country, the more amazed I become at how our Revolution happened at all, much less succeeded. As I post this it occurs to me that I don't know much about your governmental systems, whether groups have any influence over laws or not. This thread is helping me see some things differently.
 
Thank you for posting, friends from around the world. It is threads like this that make me realize what a family we are: a human family and a gun-owning family alike. The same hopes, dreams, and expectations, but expressed in different languages. And to think that wars are the only thing that really bring us together. And quite often, "together" only in the sense that we are in physical proximity. Horrible.

Peace to you all.

-Sans Authoritas
 
Restorer: I would say no, the government is pretty autonomous. There aren't that many pressure groups as much as there is a onesided pressure from the majority to push for more statism, collectivism, egalitarianism etc.

Would a gun rights lobby group help? I don't think so. Existing shooters are already hush-hush about their hobby here, as if they're ashamed of it. Unlike your country, ours has no fundemental spirit of freedom that we can appeal to. You live by right, we live by permission. The government here does not want people to own firearms and only reluctantly allows such for hunting and sports, with punitive fees attached. They probably consider it generous to allow handguns at all, and would rather ban them completely if it wasn't for protests from the olympic community et al.

Laws are national, there's no voting for different laws within your state or county. The only noteworthy regional differences are internal government policies regulating funding toward various projects and institutions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top