Here is the form:
Sorry for it being crumpled up. As you can see what I did once I saw it.
(I edited out the Chief's name just to be safe)
Unfortunately, I can think of a lot of nervous employers that would readily terminate an employee if that document wandered by the HR department. I'm sure the local PD understands that, and uses this a means to discourage applicants.
BlueHawk & Double Naught Spy are speaking like ....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.... they are wanna-be cops. Or wanna-be lawyers! " Just sign here; it'll be alright."
BlueHawk & Double Naught Spy are speaking like ....they are wanna-be cops. Or wanna-be lawyers! " Just sign here; it'll be alright."
Bluehawk said:Incorrect...I'm a retired police officer. The advice I gave is valid..since the OP has no employer, his signing the waiver has no detrimental effect at all!
Bluehawk said:It doesn't violate his 4th Amendment rights since the Fourth Amendment only protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.
The agency could simply go over to wherever an individual works and speak to his employer about the nature of his character but in this case to save time..so it seems..they simply do it an easier way.
This is nothing more than a type of character reference but AGAIN the OP has no employer so the PD will most likely just file the waiver away with his application and it won't be looked at again!
...etc.Applications for a Permit to Purchase or FID must be in the form prescribed by the Superintendent of State Police and set forth the name, residence, place of business, age, date of birth, occupation, sex, and physical description of the applicant, and state whether the applicant is a citizen, whether an alcoholic, habitual drunkard, drug dependent person,
A good place to find out if the applicant is a drunkard, alcoholic or drug dependent person would be at his place of employment through the company's drug testing or observation on the job..if they have a policy for that..so no it's not unreasonable to ask for this information when the State of NJ requires it!!!!!
The difference is whether he holds the local police to task, i.e. following the law which they have sworn to uphold.Ok. You're not employed, so what difference does it make?