thorn726
Member
so here in Berkeley we have increased home invasions, armed robberies.
a crime is discussed online by berkeley people.
i couldnt help scoff a little, mention how of course none of this was a reason for people to think about personal arms.
the reply immediately was about what i expected, with an odd twist=
"most ridiculous reason for gun ownership yet- paranoia."
NOW= am i retarded, or is that about the most messed up statement in the world.
it boggles my mind so hard. what would be the reason for gun ownership for this person? biatholon?
at least it seems like even the more anti leaning folks out here have little faith in the government, and some support of the idea it might not be best for only the govt to have arms.
isn't every base argument for gun ownership essentially paranoia if you want to twist it into that?
anyone else frustrated with this logic???
a crime is discussed online by berkeley people.
i couldnt help scoff a little, mention how of course none of this was a reason for people to think about personal arms.
the reply immediately was about what i expected, with an odd twist=
"most ridiculous reason for gun ownership yet- paranoia."
NOW= am i retarded, or is that about the most messed up statement in the world.
it boggles my mind so hard. what would be the reason for gun ownership for this person? biatholon?
at least it seems like even the more anti leaning folks out here have little faith in the government, and some support of the idea it might not be best for only the govt to have arms.
isn't every base argument for gun ownership essentially paranoia if you want to twist it into that?
anyone else frustrated with this logic???