aroseli2
Member
It seems like you can't read any article about selecting handgun ammunition that doesn't mention overpenitration of bullets. The logic that comes up all the time is that you don't want your bullet to go through the bad guy and hit innocents. Appears logical until you consider the fact that it is assumed that each bullet hits the bad guy before going on. Does anybody have a percentage of fired bullets in real life defensive shooting situations that actually strike the target?
Obviously an expanding bullet with adequate penetration is a better choice than hardball providing it functions well in your gun. I also understand the logic of choosing a bullet for indoor use that isn't going to penetrate three walls and kill the neighbor next door. This talk about going through the bad guy and into an innocent is starting to annoy me though.:banghead: Practice, accuracy and shot placement are even more important than ammo choice in my opinion but if innocent people are standing directly behind your target I think they are just as likely to be hit with a Glaser that went right next to your target as they are to be hit by a hardball that went through your target.
Thoughts on this?
Obviously an expanding bullet with adequate penetration is a better choice than hardball providing it functions well in your gun. I also understand the logic of choosing a bullet for indoor use that isn't going to penetrate three walls and kill the neighbor next door. This talk about going through the bad guy and into an innocent is starting to annoy me though.:banghead: Practice, accuracy and shot placement are even more important than ammo choice in my opinion but if innocent people are standing directly behind your target I think they are just as likely to be hit with a Glaser that went right next to your target as they are to be hit by a hardball that went through your target.
Thoughts on this?