I still think CZs are overlooked by everyone that isn't on a gun forum (read: most shooters), but that is slowly changing, and prices are getting closer to $400 than $300 for a CZ-75B now.
I would say that Colt, belive it or not, is unfairly overlooked now. Comparing a pre-Series II Kimber to a "M1991A1"-stamped Colt was no contest... the Kimber was way better. Compare a new Colt to a new Series II Kimber, however, and the Colt is IMHO a fundamentally better gun. Less MIM slag, more reliable (on average), and often
more accurate. Sympathetic gun rag tests are getting >3" at 25 yard accuracy out of Kimbers, while basic 01991s routinely are shooting into 1.5". And yes, that surprised the crap out of me, since my old Kimber ate everybody's lunch at the range.
Looking at the newest Series II Kimbers, you can really see they are cutting more corners compared to the old guns. The finishes are coarser and the "fitting" of parts is getting sloppy. I saw a whole case of the new ones and was really disappointed, since I was actually considering picking one up based on my memory of my old one. They aren't
bad, but the huge advantage they had over the competition is dead...