Gato Montés
Member
If one had to be sacrificed to secure the other, which would you let go and why? Now I know that all of us here know that neither should be disallowed as we have rights to both, but in a hypothetical situation in which one would be forced to choose one or the or the other, which do you see as more important?
It should also be noted that the idea is that no further legislation would be passed that would pose threats to whatever you choose, that the one you pick is secured for eternity no matter who is in office.
It should also be noted that the idea is that no further legislation would be passed that would pose threats to whatever you choose, that the one you pick is secured for eternity no matter who is in office.