The Earl o Sammich
Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2013
- Messages
- 72
Yes. Principles are like self responsibility. ...these days.... ain't nobody got none....
JP, LaRue, pretty much anything I build...
Mil Spec is a minimum standard. In a nut shell it basically says, you must at least meet this standard to be considered for military contract. While the upper and lower may be pretty much identical the components that go inside or on can vary greatly.
Triggers. A mil spec trigger works fine. An aftermarket trigger will break cleaner, lighter and be overall a better trigger. But an aftermarket trigger is not mil spec. Same goes for barrels. While there are some decent mil spec barrels there are some amazing aftermarket barrels. But they are not mil spec. How do they exceed that, material used, accuracy, length, weight and overall quality.
We could go on but I'm sure you get the idea.
Mil spec is just a buzz word as far as I'm concerned that means this was built to a standard. I'm not saying it is a bad standard, just that it is a starting point. A marketing phrase if you will.
I purchased a factory Colt A2 handle sight last night. I decided to keep my rifle as organic as possible, and the factory sight had everything that I was looking for. In hindsight, if knew now then what I know now, I would not have purchased a flattop, but having the ability to throw a high powered optic on my rifle without it being on top of the handle is a nice option, so I really can't complain.Aye. Respect for others too. Feel free to PM myself or others if you wish to excoriate another's opinions, or fantasy purchases, that we may stop dropping skite on @Bigmike79's thread.
I'm still learning with ARs, but my buddy that does professional smith work, said something very similar to this.We're not just speaking of a Mil spec, but a Colt 6920 Mil spec. Big difference.
I'll spark another AR thread back up in regards to building a budget long range shooter.
I may have caught the AR bug
In the "in between" go over to youtube and give the InRange TV "What Would Stoner Do" series an eyeball. They did not intend to make a budget shooter, but, if you total up what they spent, it's not bad. One of the "deep dive" episodes (really, three, now that I recall it) go into what they tried for sights, too, and addressed the whole, long/short range debate.I'll spark another AR thread back up in regards to building a budget long range shooter.
It IS; the AR is as practical as it is soul-less. Not even Gaston Glock's tactical tupperware pistol is as devoid of elegance or soul as an AR. . . but I don't think you can find a more practical rifle for 'the security of (our) free state.'
I bought my third last night.
If Colts are Mercedes, some of our ARs are like super cars."like a Colt", "as good as a Colt", "does everything a Colt will", etc.
Just like comparing a car to a Mercedes...
Welcome to the AR club.Like a few posters have pointed out, I may have caught the AR bug, as I am planning on building a range gun now where there will be almost infinite choices to be made.
A big thanks to everyone that threw in their 2 cents on this thread which helped bring me to these decisions. When I get a little more time and cash in a few months, I'll spark another AR thread back up in regards to building a budget long range shooter.