Purpose of Bull Barrel on a Ruger Mk2?

Status
Not open for further replies.
The bull barrel ads weight to the Ruger. Most target guns are heavier than non-target models. As long as it isn't too heavy to hold up a weighty target gun is a good thing because is steadier than a lighter gun.

The bull barrel also distinguishes the target Ruger pistols from the Standard models.

I haven't priced these pistols lately. Maybe someone else has the info for you.
 
In addition to the weight keeping the gun more stable as ACP230 said, bull barrels don't warp as they heat. These guns are made bazillions at a time and stress relieving a barrel isn't terribly cost effective: better to throw mass at the problem. Love my Slabside, KMK-678GC!

For pricing, check here. I've bought a few guns from Andy and find his pricing to be very competitive and his service is great.
 
My Pardini weighs in at something like 2 lbs, while the MK II weighs about a half pound more. I don't think adding weight does anything but make the gun harder to hold with one hand. Balance & grip structure are far more important than weight.
As for accuracy, I mounted a red-dot on a friends Mk II and put 10 rounds into a 1.2" circle at 50 yards (FIFTY YARDS). Ruger Mk II's shoot far better than most of the folks who shoot 'em.
 
FWIW, I prefer the short (5") bull barrel to the longer heavy barrel. I can shoot better with the shorter barrel and it keeps the weight more in the hand.

Jim
 
Sadly---the prices on MKII's have been really getting out of hand around this area.

You can't hardly touch a Standard blued model for less than $250 anymore.

I have been wanting a bull barreled one to go with my 6 7/8's Target model-----but everytime I look at the price----its dang!!! you can go ahead and keep it.

Maybe I'll have to check the hardware store and see how much it is to order one in------hhhhhmmmm
 
Lightsped:
I assume thats the Government model, right?
I paid $293 for a blued version of the same in MD, for a *used* gun (friggen integral lock law), the 5" bull barrel (non-Government) was selling for $300 new from the same dealer. The Governments are supposed to be more accurate, laser bore-sighted from the factory, etc.

I'd say jump on it.

Kharn
 
I was quoted a price of $309.00 for a stainless 6 7/8 inch bull barrell Mk II. Not sure if this is a good price or not...
Not sure either. But I'd pay it now. After all, my KMK-512 was $259 a whole bunch of years ago. And that was sticker shock since my first Ruger, an RST-6 was $92 in 1979.
 
Lightsped,
Slab sides are the competition version, but about the only difference are the grips, and that they are drilled and tapped for a rail.

that sounds like a good price, the best I could find was $350 for my goverment Target 6 7/8 SS. I did not care about being drilled and tapped for the mout because I knew I was going with the solow mounts
 
The advantage of a bull barrel is that it puts more of the weight at the muzzle. Most bullseye shooters of my acquaintance find muzzle-heavy guns absorb recoil better and are slightly quicker to aim. That's always been my personal preference; unfortunately, as my arthritis worsens, the bull barrels tend to become shorter.
 
Ruger 22 Stainless Bull Barrel........

You guys should check out the classified for a Ruger Stainless 5.5 inch Bull Barrel I have up for sale, it has moved to about the 3 rd page. I really like my 6 7/8 in. Slabside, I put a 4x Leupold on it and it shoots as good as most of my 22 rifles.

Steve E........
 
Last edited:
I think it's pointless. Just adds weight that isn't needed and makes the gun cost more. I can't shoot a regular barreled MKII fast enough in the summer heat to require a bull barrel.

But to each his own, I guess...
 
Bull barrel = more mass = less wiggly, at least within a reasonable time frame if unsupported.

Slab sides = looks, and can use a longer barrel (sight radius) without quite as much added weight as a full bull barrel.

My 678 GC outshoots everything else I own - everything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top