jerkface11
Member
It's a war movie that ISN'T anti-war and is trying to call attention to a long lasting brutal conflict that the UN and news media have ignored for DECADES. I find it hard to fault Stalone for this one.
Hey, John! Long time, no thread-chat! How's it going?
I get enough violence, gore, and bloodshed every time I talk with my ex, anyway....
It's a war movie that ISN'T anti-war and is trying to call attention to a long lasting brutal conflict that the UN and news media have ignored for DECADES. I find it hard to fault Stalone for this one.
I am not suggesting Stallone has killed anything other than the English language.
It's a war movie that ISN'T anti-war and is trying to call attention to a long lasting brutal conflict that the UN and news media have ignored for DECADES. I find it hard to fault Stalone for this one.
I have friends that are anti-gun and have guns and CC permit, and I don't see it as contradictory. I see it as having ideals but living in reality. I find it a little weird, but don't find it elitist or hipocritical.
Don't you remember Seinfeld? The old name is Burma, the new one is Myanmar.
You know, I didn't get that when I watched the movie, thanks.The claymore was attached to the "Tall Boy" that was dropped there by the English in WWII which was supposedly detonated by the claymore detonation.---amprecon
while trying to call attention to a real problem most of the world wants to ignore
I don't think it can any longer be assumed that even a majority of people do know that. Plus your foreign policy suggestion of non-intervention only works when that's your foreign policy, which it clearly is not.feedthehogs said:We all know the worlds a toilet.
P.P.S.
Don't send me anymore PM love notes, and no I don't want to see whatever pictures of yourself you've taken