Range Report: Springfield Armory Service XD9 (Long)....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey Stephen,

I've been hanging around the gun boards for the last couple of years and have always found your replys and comments very worth while. I like the BHP as you do and have three of them as well as a Kimber Custom Royal 45 ACP along with a number of other 9mm's. My latest 9mm is a S&W 952 which probably has the best trigger of any of my current pistols but some what on the expensive side. Keep up those tests, I agree they are better than most gun magazine tests.
 
Stephen,

If I could shoot half as good as you I might but my 71 year old eyes just don't cut it anymore but I do have fun at the range.
 
Hello, sir, and thanks. Well, you've got 20 years on me. I sincerely hope that in twenty I'm able to get out and enjoy myself.

Best.
 
Springfield Armory Service XD9

Mr. Camp;

Nice to see you again. Found this site after Shooters went down.

My son recently bought the Springfield XD in .40 S&W. He and I are looking forward to comparing it with my H&K USP compact in the same caliber. Thanks for the excellent report, it will give us a much better starting point with the XD, having that information.

My personal preference is to avoid the striker-fired guns. I simply prefer both the hammer and a slide mounted operating lever. As a side note; were you aware that the H&K's can now be had with an ambidextrous operating lever? I had mine retro-fitted by H&K USA, with reasonable cost & quick turn around time. I also specifically denied them the authority to mount the new safety lock device on my gun & did not get any argument about that at all. Best to you, 900F
 
Hello and thanks for the information on the HK pistols. I was not aware of it. My preference is for the visible hammered pistols and cocked and locked, but I kind of like this XD, too.

Best.
 
Mr. Camp;
Good to see you again. Since Shooter's shut down, I'd been wondering where some of the folks got off to.

My son recently bought the XD in .40 S&W. We are going to compare it with my H&K USP compact in the same caliber. Your article will be a great help with the information that it presents.

As a side note, were you aware that the USP series now can have an ambidextrous operationg lever? I sent my compact into H&K USA for retro-fitting earlier this year. The work was done quickly and at reasonable expense, with the exception that the only way they would return the gun to me was UPS next day air.
That mandatory 'service' was seriously overpriced. I also specifically denied them the right to add the new lock-out 'safety' to my gun & didn't get any argument about that whatsoever.
Best to you - 900F
 
Hello. The ice/bad weather was enough improved to head to the range with the XD9 again to do a bit more shooting and testing.

Today, due to the weather, each group fired was done at 15 yards in slow-fire while one rapid-fire group was done at 10 yards.

Furthermore, since most would consider the XD series pistols as defensive arms primarily, only ammunition from all over the defensive type was used.

Ammunition Used:

Left to Right: Remington 147 gr Golden Saber, Corbon +P 115 gr JHP, Federal Nyclad 124 gr HP, Federal 115 gr JHP, Federal 124 gr +P+ HydraShok, Corbon 124 gr "Bonded" +P JHP, and Glaser 80 gr "Silver" Safety Slug.
fc937d20.jpg


15-Yards: Five-shot groups were fired slow-fire with each brand shown. While not a definitive reliability test, 10 rounds were loaded into the magazine, a round chambered, and the magazine topped off for a total of 11 rounds in the gun. That way, the XD was being fired as it would likely be carried.

Groups were satisfactory considering the temperature. I was not sure whether it was me or the ammo with the normally very accurate 115 gr Federal JHP, but the groups are about the same. In my earlier "Range Report" on the XD, this load grouped considerably tighter; this was from a different lot and shows the need to check one's carry ammo on a regular basis.
fc937d1f.jpg


I did use a 6 O' Clock hold this time and the work at home dry-firing does seem to've helped. Also as one gentleman had advised, after some rounds went downrange in his pistol, "first-shot flyer" syndrome went away. I did NOT notice it this session. The gun's had about 350 rnds or so through it since the original report and before today's shooting.

The second set of ammunition fired for group at 15 yards.
fc937d1c.jpg

I remembered wrong. The Glaser is 80 gr, not 70.

Were I to experience any problems, I would have expected it to have been with the blunt Corbon 115 gr JHP, but such was not the case. The round fed "slickly" from both magazines be they full or only partially loaded.

The Corbon 124 gr "Bonded" JHP is an older lot of their ammunition from when they used the Speer 124 gr Gold Dot instead of Sierra's 125 gr JHP. I didn't have any Speer 124 gr +P GDHPs to try so I used these as the GDHP from Speer's a pretty popular round and velocities between the Speer and Corbon are very similar.

Not so popular as in the past, I also fired some of Glaser's +P Safety Slug. There was a problem with this round which will be brought out under "Observations."

Some prefer the heavier bullet weights in 9mm and to my surprise, I found a box of Remington's 147 gr Golden Saber and included it in today's shoot.

10-Yards:

The group consists of 11 shots firing in 5 sets of controlled pairs with the final shot fired as quickly as a sight picture picture could be obtained. It does appear that at speed, I'm "slapping" the trigger from the number of hits that are low and left. I'll work on this.
fc937d24.jpg


I used the Corbon 115 gr +P as it had the sharpest feeling recoil of any load test, though this was not at all "bad."

Observations:

The gun's capable of very good accuracy. I was not able to wring it out today, but am satisfied that it'll group better than I'm capable of. I'm becoming familar with the trigger which helps and has not proven difficult.

Ejection was similar to that reported in the initial report. However, I did have two malfunctions today, both with the Glaser. Both were failures to eject. It appears that the XD does not like this light, fast round's recoil impulse.

Note that the extractor seems to've torn the rim of this case. Though this exact same jam was repeated in firing 3 more Glasers, the rim was NOT torn. After noting this, I checked every fired case, particularly the +P rounds, for defects like the one shown; there were none. Checking the extractor claw itself showed nothing wrong.
fc937d21.jpg


I also included the "scientific mud expansion tests" on a couple of rounds. Doesn't prove anything, but folks seem to like it. If interested in how these rounds do in 10% ballistic gelatin, one site you might find of interest is www.ammolab.com , and others.

Two Corbon 115 gr +P JHPs fired from the XD.
fc937d22.jpg


...and Remington's "heavy" 147 gr Golden Saber.
fc937d1b.jpg


In closing, the Federal 124 gr Nyclad standard pressure hollow point is discontinued for public sale, but if you locate some, I've found it to be accurate and reliable in all 9mm pistols I've tried it in. Accuracy runs from "good" to "excellent" in my experience. In animals, it has expanded pretty nicely...should you prefer a standard pressure load.

Best.
 
Last edited:
Wow!! This guy needs to be on our Olympic shooting team. 15yds!!! No scope! No red dot! I am impressed; not with the pistol though.:what:
 
Great work Stephen!

Is there anywhere that I can find all of your reviews in one place?

Thanks
 
Very nice. I think the Shotgun News would publish an article like that. It's packed with way too much useful and interesting information to work for most gun rags!
 
Chronograph Results...

Hello. I continue to shoot this pistol and have had zero problems other than the one mentioned in the original report concerning Glaser 70 gr Pre-Fragmented rounds.

Today, I chronographed a number of rounds through the XD9 "Service Model" w/4.05" bbl using conventional rifling. Most of the 9mm pistols I shoot have longer bbls than this so I wanted some results with a 4" bbl to add to the data provided by other 9mms I shoot.

Information provided is from 10-shot groups fired about 10' from the muzzle. Extreme Spread and Standard Deviations are also provided.

Though I did fire some handloads, I'll provide data on the factory loads as they're likely of more interest.

Hirtenberger 100 gr JSP
"FL-Bullet":

Av. Velocity: 1311 ft/sec, ES: 70, SD: 23

Though frequently touted as "hot," I do not find this to be particularly fast for this bullet weight. This load IS a penetrator and does better on sheet steel than I've seen with many FMJ loads. I have no idea if it will open in "soft targets." There are dangerously hot SMG rounds out there from this company that I'd not shoot in my pistols, but this is not one of them. It also groups pretty darned well.
fcbeee2f.jpg


Winchester 127 gr +P+ JHP
RA9TA:

Av. Velocity: 1257 ft/sec, ES: 29, SD: 11

Somewhat difficult to obtain if not in LE, this round does expand well under most conditions and barriers according those more knowledgeable than I. I found it consistent and accurate as well. The bullet pictured was fired into water.
fc8c8480.jpg

The recovered bullet weighed 116.4 grains and the expanded diameter was 0.68"X 0.71" and the bullet was 0.365" tall. I estimate penetration at something around 13 or 14".

Federal 115 gr JHP std pressure
9BP:

Av. Velocity: 1152 ft/sec, ES: 43, SD: 13

This one, an old standard, was also fired into water. There was jacket separation. This frequently happens when doing expansion tests in water and may or may NOT happen in tissue.
fc8c8482.jpg

The recovered bullet weighed 107.8 grains. Expanded diameter of the bullet was 0.65" x 0.71" and the jacket, 0.65" x 0.88". The latter figures may not be of value, but someone always asks about that so I included it before I lost the figures.

Federal 124 gr +P+ HydraShok:
Av. Velocity: 1189 ft/sec, ES: 36, SD: 15

Remington 147 gr
Golden Saber:

Av. Velocity: 1031 ft/sec, ES: 30, SD: 10

Federal 124 gr Nyclad HP:
Av. Velocity: 1119 ft/sec, ES: 74, SD: 23

Corbon 115 gr +P JHP:
Av. Velocity: 1373 ft/sec, ES: 25, SD: 7

This XD seems to really like this Corbon load. It grouped darned well, too. Both it and the other Corbon round tested exceeded the factory's advertised velocities.

Speer "Lawman" 124 gr TMJ "Clean Fire:"
Av. Velocity: 1127 ft/sec, ES: 24, SD: 8

Corbon 124 gr +P "Bonded" JHP: (Discontinued load that uses Speer's 124 gr Gold Dot Hollow Point.)
Av. Velocity: 1290 ft/sec, ES: 47, SD: 14

None of these rounds caused any failures to feed or eject and none showed any dangerously swelled cases that could indicate iminent case blow-outs. Ejection was pretty much in the same vicinity although the rounds fired varied quite a bit.

Having seen that the XD (at least THIS one) does not have a "slow" bbl and its reliability remains 100% with the exception of the Glaser, I'm nearly ready to trust it as a self-defense pistol. I'll likely give it a "practical" wring-out in the next day or two.

fc8b5835.jpg


Hope this is of use.

Best.
 
XD9: Final Observations....

Hello. Today, I fired roughly 300 or so rounds through the XD9. There were zero malfunctions. Plates and pins at 25 yards were generally no problem, but I did NOT do as well with this pistol on bowling pins at 100 yards as with pistols having lighter, crisper triggers.

The thing is capable of better accuracy than I expected and as mentioned previously, other than with Glaser Safety Slugs, it is reliable with both standard pressure, +P, and +P+ ammunition. Today, it was fed primarily plated RN reloads along with some reloaded Hornady XTPs and Speer Gold Dots. Ejection remained positive & consistent.

Three other shooters fired the pistol and all three did pretty well with it. No malfunctions for them, either.

This evening, I finally cleaned the pistol. There was some crud at nearly a thousand rounds, but wear consisted of just the usual bright rub marks.

I do trust this relatively new pistol for defensive purposes now, but as always, the wise thing to do is test your individual pistol before trusting it for anything important.

Best.
 
Hello, and thanks. If you get the XD .357SIG, please let us know your impressions.

Best.
 
Stephen,as always an excellent write up, I have one of the first imports when they were the HS2000 in 9mm, and and now have the 40 and 357sig to go along with them,
I have found the first round flyer to be the norm with them , the guys at Black Water training seem to think its the way the slide reacts from hand chambering to recoil caused chambering. The dovetails are in fact cut so as to use SIG sights,have mounted the Ashley big dots on all of mine, and accoding to some of the first paper work put out the recoil spring guide is as another posted, a stand off to keep the muzzle from going point blank on an object.
 
XD trigger job

A few folks over on the HS2000talk site reported on a new trigger job the first week or so of February. Looks like they can get a trigger comparable to a good 1911 trigger on the XD (almost no takeup, very short reset and anywhere from 2.5 - 4 lbs pull weight).

Hmmm, a polymer gun that feels good in your hand, points like a browning, is accurate and has a 1911 level trigger? Sounds a little too good to be true!

Steve
 
It is so nice to read a review of a firearm that...............

can be taken for what it is! Just fact and considered opinion and experience. I'll probably never buy an XD but that in no way detracts from what was a most enjoyable review. Keep up the good work. Good shooting;)
 
Excellent report as always Mr. Camp!
I thought I would bump this up to the top since there seem to have been a lot of questions about the XD series recently. Hopefully some of the members will read this report and it will answer some of their questions.

The only part of the report that I disagreed with was the accuracy. The XD was just another pistol to me until I saw how accurate it was. I have been very impressed with the overall accuracy and ease at which I can shoot it well. I wonder if you got another XD-9 if your accuracy results might be a bit better. If they are not, I will chalk it up to different shooters being able to shoot different guns well. I can't shoot SIGs well unless it is from a bench or at least a two hand hold slow fire. I know that they are more accurate than I am but I just can't get all the accuracy out of them for some reasons. I wonder if the XD-9 is the same way for some shooters. It just works for me but I wouldn't be a bit surprised if it didn't work for others.

I love Stephen's reports and we are blessed to have him aboard. He trys to be impartial and gives facts in his reports not just his likes and dislikes. We need more people like Mr. Camp because I have noticed a decline in the amount of good info on this forum in the past 6 months or so. It used to be that you could get a good answer to a question by someone that knew what they were talking about on just about any subjuct. Lately it seems that if I have a specific questions about a S&W for example, I have to go the S&W boards to find someone that knew their stuff. Maybe I have just been asking more complicated question as of late and that is what I have noticed.
 
Almost 2 years later since my post on the one-shot flyer here and having handled quite a few XDs and seen others fire it too, I still see a problem with this. It decreases as the gun gets more round count. I saw a gunsmith take a file to the feedramp to improve seating and feeding on a number of them and I have seen a few drop mags during competition.

They are also rust-prone.. all in all, after 2 years of additional exposure to this weapon design and despite all the marketing hype, IMHO and FWIW, it is not the bargain or the pistol some people think it is.. and certainly not a threat to Glock..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top