Reasons we find to not buy some firearms, not to include brand

Old Dog:

Many years ago revolvers’ ergos never seemed natural, but awkward.
Therefore a revolver was never considered.

But a friend’s much more modern design actually has ergos resembling those of some semi-auto designs.
 
Last edited:
Only aluminum receivers I will accept are in 22 LR rifles. "Technological progress" ? The Colt SAA and M1911 are over 100 years old and more popular than ever. Improving manufacturing techniques is one thing-Ruger with investment casting, S&W dropping side plate screws, e.g. But look at the nostalgia for pre-64 Winchesters.
And the debate is still on over MIM parts.
I am one of the 6 or 7 pistoleros who don't like the Glock,
 
I don't like tactical rifles. I won't go into why. Just not me.
In the past year or so I've come to dislike semi auto hand guns. Especially under 4" barrels. I have a couple and want no more. Not fun.
Revolvers with a safety. Bad idea.
Large caliber anything. Too old for the recoil.
 
I really don’t like thick guns. I’m a big guy with big hands but for some odd reason I like skinny little grips like 1911’s and KAHR’s, all my favorite semis are single stacks. I just don’t buy fat guns.
 
I really don’t like thick guns. I’m a big guy with big hands but for some odd reason I like skinny little grips like 1911’s and KAHR’s, all my favorite semis are single stacks. I just don’t buy fat guns.
I have 10 semi-auto pistols and only one is a double stack.
 
Only aluminum receivers I will accept are in 22 LR rifles. "Technological progress" ? The Colt SAA and M1911 are over 100 years old and more popular than ever. Improving manufacturing techniques is one thing-Ruger with investment casting, S&W dropping side plate screws, e.g. But look at the nostalgia for pre-64 Winchesters.
And the debate is still on over MIM parts.
I am one of the 6 or 7 pistoleros who don't like the Glock,
Make that 6 or 7 or 8 that don't care for the Glock.
 
Look cool, feel great, need a new caliber, a different version of the same thing, just because, all kinds of silly reasons.

But sometimes we buy something for a specific purpose, IDPA, PRS, Steel Challenge, Trap, etc etc
 
Wont buy a Glock, if I want a poly striker gun, there are a ton of cheap clones I would pick over the $$$ "real one". I have poly guns, but they don't mean anymore to me than one of my three cordless hex drivers.
Wont buy another 1911. I don't like the grip, I really don't like the prices on a lot of them, and after 46 years of shooting the ones I've had and friends have, I just don't trust them enough to pop for one. When a $400 Tanfoglio CZ clone (Witness 45) makes several multi thousand dollar 1911's look bad, something is out of whack, and it's not the Tanfo.
No S&W revolvers with locks for me. None of the current handguns appeal to me at all.
 
This is a difficult question to answer for me. So far, every firearm I've acquired has been one I want to keep. I've made good choices, both new and used. Near the fringe end of the spectrum of keep/sell is the S&W made Walther PPK/S. Had to have it for the Bond appeal, but it's finicky. Oftentimes a few shots in, it catches a round in the slide when cycling from the magazine and jams the action requiring a tap-rack-bang. I replaced the spring with a lighter one, lightly polished the feed gate and tried a few different mags. I've found it runs fine with Speer Lawman FMJ in a Walther OEM mag. Not ideal - every other firearm I have seems to eat everything. But I still want to keep it.

I appreciate the plastic fantastics for their utility. My Glock 19 Gen 4 has been reliable and I trust it fully. But it surely isn't one of my prettier pistols. Also a 1911 guy - I shoot each differently; the difference in grip angle isn't really a pain point for me. Point with my trigger finger when shooting a 1911, point with my thumb when shooting a Glock.

I don't like the internal lock on newer S&W revolvers, though I have a few. The key safeties haven't locked up on me, and I don't anticipate they will, but I'd rather not have them. Some of my buddies installed a plug to get rid of them on theirs.

My Rossi R92 in .357 mag has a safety on the bolt. I ordered a plug to replace this; but I like the rest of the rifle enough to not be bothered with the modification.

The frustrations I have with these items are addressable. I enjoy working on my firearms that aren't dedicated to SD, but I understand how these could be turn-offs.

Biggest barrier to me is probably a bad trigger on a defense-oriented firearm. I try to keep those with stock parts, and some pistols (and rifles) just feel too mushy and unresponsive.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top