Rotometals' "Super Hard" ingots are very easy to use to make accurate BHN alloy

JimGnitecki

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2010
Messages
1,258
I was given abouy 50 lb of pure Lead some time ago, and needed a way to make a Lead alloy that would have a BHN = about 12, for use in my Pedersoli Sharps replica. A few weeks ago, someone here on the forum suggested I try using Rotometals "Super Hard" as an alloying ingredient.

Super Hard is a 30% Antimony / 70% Lead alloy that requires a "real" smelting facility to create, since pure Antimony does not melt until you hit 1166 degrees F! Rotometals offers SuperHard in 5 lb ingots, and currently has it on sale at about $24 /lb plus shipping (I live in Canada, so no free freight). It has a hardness of BHN = 36.

An article at the Los Angeles Silhouette Club (LASC) recommends Super Hard very highly for creating alloys of specific BHN targets. And, I checked with Rotometals by phone about how best to break down the 5 lb ingot into manageable chunks of weight for accurate alloying, and was told that I can simply melt the entire 5 lb ingot in a normal "home" casting furnace, as the Antimony-Lead alloy DOES melt at 650F, and "is homogeneous with your base alloy and thus blends in with your melt quickly and easily with your final flux before casting", just as the LASC article states. I melted the entire 5 lb ingot in my Lyman Mag 25 furnace, and poured it into ingot molds in weights ranging from 0.1 lb to 1 lb, so that I could mix up Lead alloys of virtually any Antimony percentage.

I used the "alloy calculator" available at the Castboolits website to determine what percentages of Lead, Tin, and Super Hard would make a suitable alloy. The calculator did all the tiresome percentage calculations. For ease of weighing out the individual components, and to have a large enough batch to reduce any errors due to some remaining earlier alloy in the pot that would not pour out through the bottom valve due to insufficient head pressure, I settled on this cobination for my test alloy batch:
Lead = 10 lb
Super Hard = 1.5 lb
Tin = 0.2 lb
Total = 11.7 lb

Per the calculator, this should produce an alloy that is:
94.4% Lead
3.85% Antimony
1.71% Tin
BHN = 12.6

After alloying these individual component metals in the Mag 25, and mixing throughly, I poured the various sizes of ingots mentioned earlier. After waiting an initial 10 hours to take hardness readings on 2 of the ingots with my Lee hardness tester, and then repeating the testing at 24 hours after the alloying, and then again at 48 hours after alloying, I have found that indeed the BHN test results range from about BHN = 12 to BHN = 13.

Using only "clean" components (Lead known to be relatively pure, Super Hard from Rotometals in The U.S., and Tin from Western Metals here in Canada), there were NO impurities brought to the surface - just a nice shiny alloy surface, making the whole process nicer than when alloying wheel weights.

Super hard is not "cheap", even at the sale price of $24US / 5 = almost $5 per pound US = $7 Canadian, plus shipping. And Tin is remarkably expensive here in Canada right now, costingabout $70 per lb plus shipping. Nevertheless, I calculated that, even with the costly shipping, my cost per FIVE HUNDRED grain bullet is sitll only $.18 Canadian = $.13 US. Right now, I cannot even GET commercially cast 500g bullets, but even if I COULD find them somewhere, they would cost $1.00 Canadian each, plus shipping. And, of course, on commercially bousht bullets, I would have little or no choice on the design of the bullet provided, whereas casting my own, I have found, and now use, the mold whose bullet my Pedersoli likes.

Yes of course using wheel weights would have cut the cost even more, BUT when I asked the manager of my local tire store about current wheel weight availability, he said that for both legal and liability reasons, NO tire stores in Canada now use lead wheel weights. The current universal solution is to use plastic coated stick-on weights of unidentified and varying composition. So, the only Lead wheel weights still available are leftovers that some scrap yards and some individual users might still have (like the 50 lb of pre-1990 wheelweights my buddy gave me). And of course Linotype is similarly now available by only "legacy" sources.

So, like it or not, the Lead, Antimony, and Tin we need to make cast bullets are now ALL either hard to get, or very costly, or both. So, products like Super Hard from Rotometals, and Tin from places like Western Metals, are going to become increasingly important to us and our shooter descendants, whether we like it or not.

Jim G
 
Just about all of my casting is done with scrap, mostly wheelweights. But the few times that I purchased alloy it was a real pleasure to cast with.

Nice write-up by the way!
 
Now that you've tried the superhard, next up is their high antimony high tin scrap, that is often on sale... may give you a mix that has a higher tin content... for paper that likely means nothing. The higher tin content gives them a better look, but if your going to pc then why????
 
Now that you've tried the superhard, next up is their high antimony high tin scrap, that is often on sale... may give you a mix that has a higher tin content... for paper that likely means nothing. The higher tin content gives them a better look, but if your going to pc then why????
Right now, I have enough of all 3 components (Lead, Tin, and Antimony via Super hard) to make over 1200 bullets, and I only use 30 to 40 rounds per range session with the Pedersoli, so it will be a while before I need to buy more components! (Fortunately, with the way both prices and availability are going)

Right now, the Pedersoli has been getting a lot of range sessions only because I have had so much difficulty finding a bullet that works well with the rifle. Now that I appear to have that bullet, I can re-start shooting other firearms that are feeling neglected.

Jim G
 
Right now, I have enough of all 3 components (Lead, Tin, and Antimony via Super hard) to make over 1200 bullets, and I only use 30 to 40 rounds per range session with the Pedersoli, so it will be a while before I need to buy more components! (Fortunately, with the way both prices and availability are going)

Right now, the Pedersoli has been getting a lot of range sessions only because I have had so much difficulty finding a bullet that works well with the rifle. Now that I appear to have that bullet, I can re-start shooting other firearms that are feeling neglected.

Jim G
The puzzle is solved, I get it... I think I'm going to work on 45c now that mom has moved here and brought my toys....
 
I was given 200 lbs of pure lead, and used several of Rotometals products, they are fantastic !! I Started with hardball and went to foundry. Find what will work for your uses. I do a melt 1-2 times a year and cast the ingots into boolits as needed. So far I’ve hand casted about 7K boolits with great results.
 
I was given abouy 50 lb of pure Lead some time ago, and needed a way to make a Lead alloy that would have a BHN = about 12, for use in my Pedersoli Sharps replica. A few weeks ago, someone here on the forum suggested I try using Rotometals "Super Hard" as an alloying ingredient.

Super Hard is a 30% Antimony / 70% Lead alloy that requires a "real" smelting facility to create, since pure Antimony does not melt until you hit 1166 degrees F! Rotometals offers SuperHard in 5 lb ingots, and currently has it on sale at about $24 /lb plus shipping (I live in Canada, so no free freight). It has a hardness of BHN = 36.

An article at the Los Angeles Silhouette Club (LASC) recommends Super Hard very highly for creating alloys of specific BHN targets. And, I checked with Rotometals by phone about how best to break down the 5 lb ingot into manageable chunks of weight for accurate alloying, and was told that I can simply melt the entire 5 lb ingot in a normal "home" casting furnace, as the Antimony-Lead alloy DOES melt at 650F, and "is homogeneous with your base alloy and thus blends in with your melt quickly and easily with your final flux before casting", just as the LASC article states. I melted the entire 5 lb ingot in my Lyman Mag 25 furnace, and poured it into ingot molds in weights ranging from 0.1 lb to 1 lb, so that I could mix up Lead alloys of virtually any Antimony percentage.

I used the "alloy calculator" available at the Castboolits website to determine what percentages of Lead, Tin, and Super Hard would make a suitable alloy. The calculator did all the tiresome percentage calculations. For ease of weighing out the individual components, and to have a large enough batch to reduce any errors due to some remaining earlier alloy in the pot that would not pour out through the bottom valve due to insufficient head pressure, I settled on this cobination for my test alloy batch:
Lead = 10 lb
Super Hard = 1.5 lb
Tin = 0.2 lb
Total = 11.7 lb

Per the calculator, this should produce an alloy that is:
94.4% Lead
3.85% Antimony
1.71% Tin
BHN = 12.6

After alloying these individual component metals in the Mag 25, and mixing throughly, I poured the various sizes of ingots mentioned earlier. After waiting an initial 10 hours to take hardness readings on 2 of the ingots with my Lee hardness tester, and then repeating the testing at 24 hours after the alloying, and then again at 48 hours after alloying, I have found that indeed the BHN test results range from about BHN = 12 to BHN = 13.

Using only "clean" components (Lead known to be relatively pure, Super Hard from Rotometals in The U.S., and Tin from Western Metals here in Canada), there were NO impurities brought to the surface - just a nice shiny alloy surface, making the whole process nicer than when alloying wheel weights.

Super hard is not "cheap", even at the sale price of $24US / 5 = almost $5 per pound US = $7 Canadian, plus shipping. And Tin is remarkably expensive here in Canada right now, costingabout $70 per lb plus shipping. Nevertheless, I calculated that, even with the costly shipping, my cost per FIVE HUNDRED grain bullet is sitll only $.18 Canadian = $.13 US. Right now, I cannot even GET commercially cast 500g bullets, but even if I COULD find them somewhere, they would cost $1.00 Canadian each, plus shipping. And, of course, on commercially bousht bullets, I would have little or no choice on the design of the bullet provided, whereas casting my own, I have found, and now use, the mold whose bullet my Pedersoli likes.

Yes of course using wheel weights would have cut the cost even more, BUT when I asked the manager of my local tire store about current wheel weight availability, he said that for both legal and liability reasons, NO tire stores in Canada now use lead wheel weights. The current universal solution is to use plastic coated stick-on weights of unidentified and varying composition. So, the only Lead wheel weights still available are leftovers that some scrap yards and some individual users might still have (like the 50 lb of pre-1990 wheelweights my buddy gave me). And of course Linotype is similarly now available by only "legacy" sources.

So, like it or not, the Lead, Antimony, and Tin we need to make cast bullets are now ALL either hard to get, or very costly, or both. So, products like Super Hard from Rotometals, and Tin from places like Western Metals, are going to become increasingly important to us and our shooter descendants, whether we like it or not.

Jim G
Super hard is a good start, IMO. I started casting around March of 2020. RotoMetals had a sell of the super hard for $19.99 a bar with free shipping for $100+ orders. Being off work I had lots of time to read Glen Fryxell's "From Ingot to Target". Bought a few pounds of pewter of ebay for the tin.

I mixed up 95% lead, 3% Sb, 2% Sn for about 11Bhn. Shoots good in pistol.

I got into the PC with Hi-Tek coating. Using the same ratio and coating, I shot some 158 gr. SWC (1850 fps), and 170 gr. SWC (1675 fps) out of a Ruger 77/357 with no barrel fouling.
 
Iin comparing the WEIGHT of the bullets cast with the wheel weight material I used up until now, to the weight of the bullets cast using my test alloy formula based on Rotometals' Super Hard, I gained some insight into the composition of the wheel weight material.

Bullets made from the wheel weight weighed an average of 496.7 grains.
Bullets made from the new alloy (10 lb Lead, 1.5 lb Super Hard, and 0.2 lb Tin) weigh an average of 492.9 grains (0.77% lighter).

In addition, the Standard Deviation in the weight of the wheel weight alloy bullets was 1.0 grain.
The standard Deviation in the weight of the new alloy bullets is the same.

But the extreme spread in the weight of the wheel weight alloy bullets was 0.9%.
The extreme spread in the weight of the new alloy bullets is 0.7%.

The wheel weight alloy bullets havea BHN = approximately 10.
The new alloy bullets have a BHN = approximately 12.5. (I wanted them to be harder, as I am now loading to higher pressures).

So, these statistics tell me:

- Since Antimony and Tin are both lighter than Lead, and the new bullets are lighter than the wheel weight bullets, that means that the wheel weight alloy, which was a mix of wheel weights all harvested at least 30 years ago, had Tin and or Antimony content that was lower than my new alloy has. The new alloy is 94.4% Lead, 3.85% Antimony, and 1.71% Tin.

- Since I had also added 1% Tin to the melted wheel weight material, the ORIGINAL wheel weight material must have been even lower in alloys added to the Lead. Since the new alloy is 94.4% Lead, the original wheel weights must have been MORE than 94.4% Lead. This explains why bullets I made from the original wheel weight material were softer than bullets made from the new alloy (as intended).

- Since the Extreme Spread of the new alloy made from "virgin" components of Lead, Super Hard, and Tin, is lower than the ES of the wheel weight based alloy, the new alloy seems to be a little more uniform than the wheel weight material. This of course is to be expected, since wheel weights were never intended to have "standardized", or even uniform, density. The installers simply needed to know the specific weight of each individual wheel weight when installing them. Nevertheless, since the Standard Deviation of both the wheel weightalloy and the new alloy are identical, it appears that 30 years ago wheel weight material did not vary as much as it apparently does on newer wheel weight composition.

Jim G
 
Back
Top