astocks2622
Member
i am looking for a new hunting rifle for this fall. two that caught my eye are the ruger m77 in 30-06, and the remington 700 sps. i like the looks of the ruger (walnut stock), and that it's shorter and better suited to dense woods. it also has a $50 lower price tag. the remington points slightly better for me, and i like the trigger better. however, i don't like the all matte finish on the gun including the bolt. is there enough performance difference between the ruger and the remington to fork over the extra $50?