I just received the following from Senator Kohl (D-WI) in response to my message to him asking him to vote for a clean bill this past Tuesday. While S1805 is history, I've found reading the responses that other members received from their senators interesting so I figured I'd throw this one up.
Let's see, he's got all the bases covered:
- Gun laws prevent crime and make communities safer. Check
- Only firearms for hunting and sporting purposes. (The police will protect us.) Check
- Gun locks save lives. Check
- It's for the children. Check
- Assault weapons are favored by criminals and drug dealers. Check
No big surprise here. This acorn didn't fall far from the tree. The removal of Liberties Tree that is.
I especially like this line:
I guess Herb's got a different definition of unreasonable than the rest of us.
BTW, what's a "Street Sweeper"? When the AWB expires I'll obviously have to get one.
- Abe
Dear Mr. XXXXXXXX:
Thank you for taking the time to contact me. I apologize for the delay in my
response. I value the correspondence I get from people back home in Wisconsin
and would like to take this opportunity to address your concerns.
While I do believe that Americans have the right to own a gun, laws
prohibiting felons and other potentially dangerous individuals from owning
guns are reasonable and effective ways to keep firearms out of the hands of
criminals. In the past, the Senate has considered a variety of gun safety
measures. I carefully evaluate each of these proposals, and I only support
gun control legislation that corresponds to three important principles.
First, I do not believe we should deprive Wisconsin's hunters and target
shooters of the firearms they use for sporting purposes. Second, I will only
support proposals that I believe will unquestionably make our communities
safer. Finally, I will not support any bill that will unreasonably infringe
on the rights of law abiding gun owners.
I appreciate knowing your thoughts about S.1805, the "Protection of Lawful
Commerce in Arms Act," introduced by Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) on October 31,
2003. The bill would have prohibited civil lawsuits against firearms
manufacturers and dealers. Though frivolous lawsuits should never be condoned,
this legislation would have prevented many innocent victims from having their
day in court, even after impartial judges have determined a gun manufacturer
or dealer may have acted improperly.
As you may know, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and I introduced an amendment to
this bill to prohibit the sale of any handgun, unless the buyer also purchases
a gun storage or safety device. This legislation would significantly reduce
the incidence of gun-related tragedies in this country among children, the
most vulnerable of our population. Currently, in one out of every eight homes
where guns are kept loaded, the firearms are left unlocked. Though not a
complete solution, this amendment would save many lives. This amendment
passed overwhelmingly by a vote of 70-27.
An amendment offered by Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA) would have reauthorized
the Assault Weapons Ban for ten years. As you know, the Assault Weapons Ban
restricts the manufacture of nineteen types of semi-automatic assault weapons,
including the Uzi, the "Street Sweeper", and the AK-47. These are the types
of weapons favored by criminals and drug dealers, and the law enforcement
community has made banning these weapons a top priority. I supported this
amendment, which passed by a vote of 52-47.
Each of the amendments attached to this bill represented important elements in
the effort to reduce gun violence in this country by helping to keep dangerous
weapons out of the hands of criminals and preventing accidental deaths.
Unfortunately, it became clear that Senate negotiators did not intend to
defend these amendments in a House-Senate conference, which is why I voted
against S.1805. The "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act" failed to
pass the Senate by a vote of 90-8 on March 3, 2004. I will be sure to keep
your views in mind if the Senate debates this issue in the future. Again,
thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts with me.
Sincerely,
Herb Kohl
U.S. Senator
Let's see, he's got all the bases covered:
- Gun laws prevent crime and make communities safer. Check
- Only firearms for hunting and sporting purposes. (The police will protect us.) Check
- Gun locks save lives. Check
- It's for the children. Check
- Assault weapons are favored by criminals and drug dealers. Check
No big surprise here. This acorn didn't fall far from the tree. The removal of Liberties Tree that is.
I especially like this line:
I will not support any bill that will unreasonably infringe on the rights of law abiding gun owners.
I guess Herb's got a different definition of unreasonable than the rest of us.
BTW, what's a "Street Sweeper"? When the AWB expires I'll obviously have to get one.
- Abe