tmr612 said:
I wouldn't take a chance with this breed.
I would find your post amusing if it wasn't so sad. I assume that you don't agree with how people demonize specific guns instead of the people who misuse them. But by maligning pit bulls, you're using the exact same twisted logic that anti-gun folks use.
Pit bulls make wonderful pets. They're sweet, loving dogs who are great with children. My brother has a 75 lb. pit bull who is fantastic with his two-year-old. And I have a 70 lb. pit bull mix who is so sweet to my 3-month-old daughter. The only issue is sometimes he licks her too much.
But, like any other dog, pit bulls can be vicious if abused or neglected. They were originally bred for animal aggression, so with a bad upbringing they can be more dangerous than some other dogs. But the main reason they get such a bad name is because they're so popular with criminal types. Pit bulls are often used as status symbols because of their intimidating appearance. These dogs are basically fashion statements and are intentionally raised to be aggressive, and as a result you end up with dangerous, aggressive pit bulls. But it's because of the owner, not the breed.
The AR-15 is often the weapon of choice for mass shooters. And, in the wrong hands, it can be a little bit more deadly than some other types of firearms. But that's no reason to be against AR-15s.
Along the same lines, the pit bull is the dog of choice for people who abuse dogs into being mean and aggressive. And, if abused or intentionally raised to be aggressive, a pit bull can be a more dangerous than some other dogs. But that's no reason to avoid the breed as a whole; if they're raised properly they make wonderful pets.
Most pit bulls are great with kids. I suspect that when my daughter gets a little older I'll have a lot of pictures just like this one: