johndoe1027
Member
Rattlesnake, thanks for your input. You would rather me leave my gun under the seat as opposed to exposing it? I just hate reaching for anything in this situation.
Never mind, maybe it was just the way I read it. After reading your post and explaination it seems logical to handle things this way, however I feel that if you take my loaded gun to check it then it should be loaded when I get it back. The reason for that is I carry for my protection so if you give me my gun back unloaded the first thing I'm gonna do is reload it, so you can see there might be a misunderstanding as to my intentions. I respect all law enforcement and have jumped out of my SUV to try and help in at least 1 altercation.
So how do we handle the situation? Do I leave the gun alone until you pull out, or do I go ahead and reload it and put it back in my holster while you are writing my ticket? cause I ani't moving until I can secure my gun.
Perhaps police should take a serious self evaluation and ask why they fear the general public so much. If you as a police officer have to fear what I will do with a firearm then maybe you need to take a long hard look at your actions and attitudes. This is especially true when you know up front that I have passed a state and federal background check and have demonstrated a history of responsible behavior in the public eye. This whole subject is indicative of whats wrong with law enforcement in america.
I like that a lot. I'll have to remember that is what it's called...a slight excess of enthusiasm
Can you explain why?It's just bad juju and bad officer survival techniques/tactics.
The post I quoted referred to running gun traces (not car traces) even though was no mention of anyone breaking any gun laws. Checking all gun owners “just-in-case” seems to me no different than checking all blacks “just-in-case.” It implies that all people in that group are guilty until proven innocent, and it scares me that people with guns & badges think like that.glummer, you're gonna be "run" anytime you break a law.
You can substitute “Jew”, or “infidel”, or “black man dating a white woman” for “person with a CHL”, and make the same argument. It’s all about tolerating bigotry, it seems to me, and I find it objectionable.just because you and I are unconcerned about a person with a CHL doesn't mean that the rest of the world has the same viewpoint.
Even an LEO.anyone can have an ND.
Or unloading an unfamiliar gun, when it is not necessary.All it takes is that one clumsy move, like when reloading after a traffic stop.
But it's OK if I'm in "oops" range the whole time?It really is a good idea for Officer Friendly to hand you back your weapon in a manner that gives him time to be out of "oops" range.