sub-compact Glock advice...

Status
Not open for further replies.
He may have been giving me a fourth mag. I didn't look in the box. He just offered to throw in an extra mag. Thanks for the heads up though.
 
I've tried most of the smaller Glocks (G26, G27, G36, G30SF) and I would choose either the G26 or G30SF

G27 - annoying to shoot, too snappy for my tastes
G36 - capacity sucks compared to the size

G26 - comfortable to shoot, accurate, good capacity
G30SF - comfortable to shoot, accurate, good capacity (a little chunky, but it carries IWB fine for me)

If I were to buy one again, it would be between a G26 and G30SF. I would probably go with a G30SF since I already have a smaller 9mm carry option
 
I have a G26 and it is a superb weapon. During my practice session today I actually shot it a little bit better than my G22. I carry mine in a DeSantis DualCarry holster.
 
+1 for the Glock 26.. In the colder months you pop in a 15rd mag w/ one of those mag sleeve grips and BOOM you got a glock 19!
 
I like the .40 in a full sized gun (G22), but I'm not as fond of it in a subcompact (G27). I shoot the G26 extremely well though (for me, anyway). I'm currently in the market for one, I just can't decide between a Gen3 and a Gen4.

Or then again, maybe I want an M&P9c. I seem to shoot them pretty well, too.

R
 
I was amazed by the G26 accuracy after firing one. You may prefer a single stack pistol for deep concealment. As good as the Glock is, many go PM9/CW9 for deep concealment
 
Last edited:
You can't go wrong with the G26.


Or the G27.


Or the G33.


:D


Overall, I think the G26 is probably the best when it comes to controllability and rapid follow-up shots.
I agree 100% on the G 26. Great CCW gun! I even forgot I was carrying IWB today. I've switched my every day carry from the G 23, or Kimber Pro, to the 26 and I feel like I've lost weight.
 
Huge fane of the G23 not so much a fan of the G27 (I also find it too snappy for such a small pistol - so I would also throw out the G33 (if you think the 27 is snappy try a 33...)) I have only had range experience with a G33...

I see you also had a G30 (my edc owb) so I would lead you to the G36. Many consider it a great combination of size and calliber. The G36 is the slimmest Glock made (as per the specs on the website).
 
I think the Glock shines in 9mm. I owned a 26 with Trijicon night sights and really liked it, but was more comfortable with my XD Service (4") and the Glock seemed redundant, so I sold it off to finance my 1911. Still, I much prefer the Glock to the XD in the subcompact size, even the the opposite is true in the compact and full-sizes.

I am also fascinated with the GAP round and have considered the 39, but considering I nearly double my magazine capacity in 9mm sold me on the 26. Just my 2 cents.

Also, if you get a 27 or 33, you the barrels interchange and you can get a 9mm conversion barrel. Thus those two pistols accommodate 3 calibers. Not true for the 26 and its limited breech face. So if that interests you it may be worth considering.

If I ever had an itch to part with my XD, I would be torn between a 26 or a Walther PPS to replace it. I am certain it would be one of those two.
 
The 26 is excellent for carry and shootabillity Ive own two.
Recoil is subjective and I guess Im the odd man out,but I now carry a 27.
I dont mind the recoil,its accurate and ive found for me it comes back on target not much slower.For me its a compomise between power and capacity
in the size I can still pull off carry at work,otherwise Id still be toating my 1911.
 
+1 on the G26. I had this same debate and ended up with this model. I actually preferred the G36 (45ACP) over the G27 (.40 S&W) as far as the sub Glocks go. The 36 pushed more than snapped, which seemed more controllable. But, I chose the G26 overall because of capacity and easy of delivering follow up shots accurately and consistently. No intentions to start a caliber debate, but I believe the 9mm is an effective round as long as you load it with decent ammo. Mine performs well with the old school Federal Hi-Shock in +P+ variety.
 
I have no doubt that the 9mm with good ammo is a formidable round. I've seen the real world difference between ball ammo and Federal Hydra-Shoks and they seemed night and day.

Anybody ankle carry a G26 or am I crazy for even thinking it? Deep concealment is my top concern and I'm thinking a Kel-Tec PF9 may even be a better choice. I usually wear cowboy boots at work, so I'm not super concerned about it printing through a pants leg. What worries me is the thickness and weight on a 12-14 hour day. I know a gun should be comfortable, not comforting, but let's be realistic. A ball and chain on my ankle is not likely to be carried every day.
 
I would look elsewhere for ankle carry. The 26 is a little on the chubby side. I have a friend that is a retired police officer and even he admitted that it took quite a while to get used to carrying his G27 as a BUG on his ankle. If you do, dont cheap out on the ankle holster. There's very few that I have seen that work well in this position.
 
I intend to buy a nice ankle rig if I go that route. Hate to have a $500 pistol that I can't carry because the cheap holster makes it uncomfortable to strap on.

Anybody seen a used OD G26 for sale at a reasonable price? Reasonable being around $400 in good condition. Since they quit making them, they certainly became popular.
 
G26 is a great carry gun - I had one for years and loved it. I currently carry a G36 and feel that its much more comfortable to carry all day. It's flatter and fits my hand better. I also like the .45 ACP round and think it's the best handgun round for stopping humans ever developed. Big hole + very manageable recoil.

Although the G36 is only 6+1, the average CCW engagement is 3 rounds. I usually have an extra mag with me too. If I need more than 13 rounds of .45 ACP, then I'm grabbing my AR! :what:
 
I have both the 26 and 27 and almost bout a 33 until I saw how much the sig ammo cost. The g27 was my first gun purchase and the first pistol I ever shot. I thought it was great because I didn't have any thing else to compare it to. But after buying and shooting the 26, 19 ,30 , and 36 I fell out of favor with the 40 s&w. The 27 is a little snappy for my liking, I really don't care for my hk usp chambered in 40. The 26 will give you much quicker and accurate follow up shots and 10+1 rounds of 9mm is plenty in civilian use. The 36 is a very comfortable gun to carry iwb but its onl7 7+1 single stack mag. Thats alot of reloading at the range! the 26 is cool because it will take the 17 and 19 mag and if you feel froggy you can pop the ole 33 rounder in it. I love the 26 but I carry the 19 because neither is more comfortable than the other iwb.
I have a wild bill consealment holster iwb that works great with the 26 and the cross breed is also another great option! Happy Glockin
 
I've found quite a few OD G22s, a G23, and a G27 for sale locally. Prices aren't outrageous but they're all .40 S&W and I really don't want to have to buy another barrel.
 
My vote is for the Glock 26, it's a great little gun that conceals well and is actually fun to shoot. The G36 is a nice weapon as well, the handling characteristics are good for my large hands and the recoil is noticeable but not difficult to handle, which is pretty good for a compact .45.
 
I may end up with a Kel-Tec PF9 just because of concealability. I wish Glock would make a single stack 9mm. If there is one thing Glock fails at miserably it is listening to their civilian customers.
 
I disagree with your statement about Glock... I also disagree about you believing a Kel-Tec will protect your life as well as a Glock. There are 9mm single stacks out there (Kahr, Ruger, Taurus) so it's not like the market is barren - but, I would never advocate someone carrying a Kel-Tec as their primary CCW.:barf:
 
The 26 is deadlly accurate. I went yesterday wit my wife and cousin, all in our 60's. I have been shooting for 50 years, and for a small gun with the plus 2 added. It is just a killer gun. I was re teaching my wife who fired a G-30,G26, PF-9, and a LCP. She fired the LCP best, because of a bad wrist, but the 45 was a close second. I put one round in my G26, ran it out to 50 ft, and said Ok now watch this, right between the 1 and 0, in 10. It dosen't get any better than that. All 3 mags were in the 8-10, shooting rapid fire. There is no way I can shoot my other guns that well. I haven't been shooting for several years until we moved up to Vero, and in 6 range sessions, it is all coming back to when I shot competition in my youth. Too bad the new glasses came in a day late, I can't wait till next time when I can see the target and the sights.I shot 45's like that way back from my youth, I can almost shoot the 45 as good as the 9, soon it will be as it was. Find a gun that you shoot well, and practice with it. I highlly recommend the Talon Grip tape on sub compact pistols. I got it from hickock 45 last year, and it has improved my accuracy and speed shooting12 rounds in 5-6 seconds, I find that rythm helps me. Taking my time is not my best attribute, my natural shooting, pistol shooting, rythem is faster than most people that I have seen over the years, not to be cool, I just shoot better when I let go. To me in a gunfight, unless there is cover, you need to get accurate shots off as fast and as possible. My natural rythem is fast. I was never as accurate with the 27 or the 23, but that's me. You need to find what you shoot best, and go with that. My 1911 was my best 45, so that's next on my list to replace. I made a big mistake selling my 2 commanders years ago, thinking they were too big to carry. We learn as we get older. Good luck on whatever you choose, just try them all till you hit the right one, you will know right away.
 
Wario, I've shot a lot of pistols from a lot of manufacturers and I have never had a problem with a Kel-Tec.

I stand behind my statement about Glock. I like Glock. In fact, I only own a couple of pistols that don't have that G stamp on them, but the bottom line is that they are not very innovative and they don't listen very well to consumers. Look how many manufacturers are bringing out single stack, compact 9mms. That tells me that consumers are looking for that type of firearm. Glocks failure to release one tells me they are either way behind, or they just don't care.

I'll continue to shoot Glocks. I'll continue to trust my life to them, but I have also trusted my life at various times to a Beretta, a Ruger, a Kimber, a Sig, a Taurus, a Smith and Wesson a CZ and a Browning.

I'm going to the shop tomorrow and if I feel like I can completely conceal a G26, then yes, that is what I would rather have, if not, I will get a PF9, check it's reliability and feel quite safe in carrying it.
 
I'd personally go with the 9mm in that small package. The larger calibers will be difficult to control. And this coming from me, and I'm a fan of the .40cal. But I can't control it in the baby Glock, so I recommend the 9mm.

You'll have difficulty controlling the .357sig and .45 variants IMO.

Besides, I have concluded that shot placement and fast followups are more important than the biggest calibers. In a big gun, I'll take big calibers because I can control them. But in a small gun, you have to recognize its limitations and use smaller calibers.

And with the 9mm you'll be able to afford more range practice time.

Enjoy!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top