Sunset = which way to vote come Nov.

Status
Not open for further replies.

hillbilly

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
3,165
Location
Iowa
The message is simple and clear.

If you want to keep your newly regained freedom, you must use your vote in Nov. to keep antis out of office, or to remove incumbent antis from office.

And simple, brutal math reveals that in about 90% of the cases, that means voting AGAINST Democrats. The history and voting records all the way through the horrible AWB saga for the last decade reveals exactly who your enemies are.

All you fence-sitting "wait and see" voters out there now see which side of the fence you must come down to.

All you "make a statement" third-party voters must now see that throwing your vote away in a symbolic statement doesn't help us keep our newly regained freedom.

Only voting against antis is the proper and logical response here in the wake of the AWB's demise.

hillbilly

_
The Following text appears at http://www.awbansunset.com




I don't know about the rest of you, but right now feels just like when you're on the way home from a long trip, and after what seems like an eternity behind the wheel, you finally see the Interstate sign that says you're only a few miles from home. After 10 long years, the failed experiment that is the so-called "assault weapons" ban is coming to a close tonight*.
This victory is primarily symbolic... let's be honest, the main reason why many of us agonized over our lack of adjustable stocks and flash suppressors was that we couldn't have them (well, not without paying a lot more than we felt like we should have to), though the price premium inflicted on some full-capacity magazines was brutal. But, even though the expiration is mostly symbolic, the symbolism is undeniably HUGE. More than anything else, this is a tremendous defeat for the anti-gun movement, effectively stopping it in its tracks. Though they haven't made much (if any) progress in recent years, the AWB was their signature issue, the renewal of which they probably felt would be a slam-dunk. But despite the intense campaign of misinformation, including despicable scare tactics, over-the-top emotional rhetoric, misleading use of statistics, and making the public think the ban restricted machine guns, logic prevailed, and the ban is not going to be renewed.
Anyway, while we take some time to enjoy our hard-fought victory, let us begin to look towards and prepare for the next phase of this battle... follow-through.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein stated a month or two ago, after essentially giving up hope of passing an AWB renewal this year, that she as looking to the November elections to produce a Congress and White House that would be more favorable to the prospect of passing her gun ban. It is up to us to ensure this does not happen.
Many gun owners were understandably upset at President Bush's position of supporting renewal of the ban. But still, here we are... on the cusp of the ban's expiration. President Bush, while maintaining his position that he would sign the ban if it reached his desk, never pushed Congress to do so. Of course, it is likely that even if he had pushed Congress, it still would not have passed in the House, but it certainly did not hurt for him to simply take a passive position on the issue.
John Kerry, on the other hand, strongly supports not only renewing the ban, but "strengthening" it, as he is a co-sponsor of Sen. Frank Lautenberg's radically expanded ban. This frightening bill, S.1431, would ban many more guns, including some specifically "protected" by the 1994 ban. ALL AR-15 and AK-style firearms would be banned (including what we now consider to be "post-ban" firearms), likely bringing an end to the many competitions that use the former. In addition, all semiautomatic rifles or shotguns that have "any characteristic that can function as a grip" would be banned. This dangerously broad description includes pretty much all semiautomatic long guns that have ever been produced, including the shotgun Kerry himself recently received as a gift.
While I doubt there are many gun owners who are going to vote for Kerry anyway, many of us might be considering voting for a third party candidate who maintains an even stronger position on the Second Amendment than President Bush. While it is very tempting to vote for a candidate who so strongly supports the right to keep and bear arms, I think the Republican party has delivered on their promise to support the Second Amendment, and President Bush is getting my vote.
Getting the vote out for Congressional elections is very important too. While Republicans do not appear to be at risk of losing control of the House, adding to the margin of power there would certainly bolster our position. In the Senate, however, there are enough close races that power could possibly shift to the Democrats. That would mean Sen. Bill Frist, the person who essentially shut down any chance of the AWB coming up in that body after Feinstein got her one chance in March, would no longer control the Senate agenda.
So, in short, it is VITAL that we all show up to the polls in November.
Next, although we politically active gun owners are the foot soldiers in this battle, organizations like the NRA and GOA are the heavy artillery. Of course, that statement is somewhat contradictory, as these organizations CONSIST of gun owners. Without us they are nothing... and that's the point. Each of us, waging our own little war against the AWB and gun control in general, can certainly have an effect. But our strength is multiplied tenfold when we actually band together in the form of joining organizations like these. THAT is why the so-called "gun lobby" (which would be more accurately termed the "gun OWNER lobby") is so feared... it is the combination of all of us individually doing our part to ensure our elected officials know how important this issue is to us, AND collectively pooling our resources to accomplish things that, individually, would be impossible, that keeps the Second Amendment protected.
So, if you are not already a member, IMMEDIATELY join the National Rifle Association, and if you can, join Gun Owners of America too. Without these organizations, we would likely not be celebrating right now. If you are already a member of the NRA, please donate some additional funds to the NRA-ILA, even if it's just $20 or so, as this is the arm of the NRA that actually does the work of representing our interests in government.
 
You're right, hillwilliam. More than ever, we have to be calm but vocal and speak to our reps about why we vote as we do. Doesn't matter if some ridicule our "single-issue" stance. I don't care if others view me as a single-issue voter, and I understand that there are many, many issues other than gun rights. But RKBA has become a touchstone for me. Strangely, I find that if a candidate is right with the RKBA issue, he's generally right, or nearly so, on other important issues as well, and worthy of my support.

TC
TFL Survivor
 
A candidates views on RKBA are a pretty good litmus test about his views on personal responsibility, liberty/freedom, privacy issues and similar issues. This isn't absolute, of course, but it's a fair generalization.

No matter how anybody votes, either Kerry or Bush is going to be president for the next four years. Badnarik won't be the next president. Nader won't be the next president.

We know Kerry will initiate and/or support any new anti-gun legislation. That's an absolute. It WILL happen if he's president, and any bad bill that gets passed will get signed.

We at least have a good chance of influencing legislation if Bush is president. We know he's pretty much passive on gun legislation, and we have a pro-gun guy in Ashcroft--who has influence on any legislation proposed by the administration.

I don't have to want to hug Dubya's neck to happily vote against Kerry.

:), Art
 
While I doubt there are many gun owners who are going to vote for Kerry anyway, many of us might be considering voting for a third party candidate who maintains an even stronger position on the Second Amendment than President Bush.

While it is very tempting to vote for a candidate who so strongly supports the right to keep and bear arms, I think the Republican party has delivered on their promise to support the Second Amendment, and President Bush is getting my vote.

Great quote from http://www.awbansunset.com
 
While it is very tempting to vote for a candidate who so strongly supports the right to keep and bear arms, I think the Republican party has delivered on their promise to support the Second Amendment, and President Bush is getting my vote.
Not to rain on a pretty decent parade this day, but Bush has stated repeatedly that he WOULD sign a renewal of the AWB if it reached his desk.

IMO, not significantly better than Kerry on the matter.
 
Not to rain on a pretty decent parade this day, but Bush has stated repeatedly that he WOULD sign a renewal of the AWB if it reached his desk.

IMO, not significantly better than Kerry on the matter.

his actions speak louder than his words - he hasn't lobbied congress for it or any other gun legislation. i think he just said this to gain a small amount of support from the other side. i mean, the guy's from texas :)
 
I'm a "small - l" libertarian, and I am voting for Bush. In 2000 many of us signed a petition that told Bush that if he signed one more anti-gun law, we would vote Libertarian en masse in 2004. He held up his end of the deal; I'm holding up mine.

While it is very tempting to vote for a candidate who so strongly supports the right to keep and bear arms, I think the Republican party has delivered on their promise to support the Second Amendment, and President Bush is getting my vote.

Yup.

And, while I'm currently an annually-renewing NRA member, I'm strongly considering becoming a Lifetime member now. NRA was instrumental in allowing us to exercise this freedom once again.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top