Taurus handguns.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Worked in a shop that did a decent amount of volume, and sold/sells Taurus.
Prev to that I worked in advanced materials and process development for a major manufacturer. Bit of knowledge in various manufacturing/design/test stuff.

Have personally seen Taurus failures in different models/time periods..........manufacturing, materials and design screw ups.

The customer service..............send it back and it goes into limbo.
May come back fixed, may come back with same problem.

Never know.

They don't just have a "bad batch". There are way too many failures for that.
Got guns of widely varying serial #, from different wholesalers, over several years.

Not a "bad batch". Been some mgmnt changes at Taurus to combat the QC and CS problems. Dunno what improvements have been made.

If you got a good Taurus, be glad.

Personally, I wouldn't give my ex mother in law one of the things.

I still hang out at the shop.............they have a thick spiral ring notebook of past and present Taurus send backs.

Having personally seen the stuff, and even fixed some of the errors..........I refuse to even touch one of their rigs now. Some workers at the shop have asked me to trouble shoot a customer's gun problem..........if it's a Taurus I decline.

Great warranty. Smile and use it. It's not like this is hidden info.

Having said all that............must relay a good incident with Taurus. Customer gets into reloading, the shop has a range. Judge blows up. Owner claims "I dunno". Dig a little and he confesses, he might have doubled a .45 Colt.

Call/email to Taurus- they say send it back.

We hear nothing for 9 months and then a box shows up, brand new replacement, free of charge.

They took care of a customer, when IMHO they didn't have to.

I'd call that exemplary service..........well, would if they sent him a new S&W ;)

Taurus has had a lot of problems, if you haven't experienced any...........good for you. Enjoy your gun(s).
But to deny the problems..........is just fan boy nonsense.

Sure, most of the time a problem is user error.

Many people are not logical, or know how to run an experiment, or trouble shoot. Even those who claim some technical knowledge/experience.
But not everybody is wrong or clueless.

Some of us have seen the problems, over and over.

I caught a ton of flack on some forums a couple of yrs ago for posting such things.
It is what it is.

Buy a Taurus if you want. If it breaks or doesn't work right, can't say you haven't been warned.
 
Garbage in my opinion. I had a Taurus snub nose revolver that would completely lock up after about 20-25 rounds fired. Gunsmith and hammers type lock up, gun was about worthless, sold it to a friend for $20.



2h7fbk3.jpg
Exact same thing also here! Forcing cone issue, that 3 trips back to Taurus didn't fix. I also took a small bath on it to rid myself of the problem.

I've thrown a bit of money away with Taurus now that i think about it.

Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk
 
BTW, I think it wise to never buy the first of a new model.
Of anything.

Wait a yr and let them figure out any bugs (if there are some) and then buy.
 
But but but...............they're ISO9000 certified!

Yeah, that's just politics.

ISO just means "say what you do, do what you say".

And assumes the truth is being reported.

That could help with quality, but in no way guarantees it. Pretty good gig, ISO politics............pay me to grade you, do nothing to add real value............minimal overhead. It's a scam. A smart one.

Funny when auditors show up right before a major sporting event. Did work for a pretty good company, and we always passed with flying colors.........but I think at least part f that was timing and buy off.
 
PT1911AL...bought it because of the price of admission and I wanted to try a 1911 with an aluminum frame...mine's been 100% for years...picked up two more in stainless...Super .38 and .45ACP...both of them have gone bang every time and are as accurate as they need to be...

Bill
 
A guy I know just got a PT-92. Shooting it off a rest, it was shooting 6-8 inches low at about 20 feet.

My stainless PT92 shoots very well, and it's gorgeous. And most people I've communicated with who own them also speak highly of them. The ones in the 80s were ultra-reliable, which was good, but accuracy wasn't up to Beretta standards. They were okay for combat use, but I got rid of mine because I wanted them to be as good as the Berettas. The bluing just wasn't up to snuff, either, but that didn't bother me -- accuracy, durability, price and reliability were what I was after. Then the stainless model came out and I was hooked. The finish is what I love in a gun. Beautiful and on the flashy side. Also, it ranked high on the other aspects.

That said, my S&W 659 and 5906 are still my favorite 9mm pistols, but I love the Taurus. It's just like a Beretta, only with a better safety!

Taurus92_1.jpg

Taurus92_3.jpg
 
sounds like taurus has a high lemon percentage. ya pays your money and ya takes your chances!

murf
 
I liked the Millennium G2 sold it for higher quality guns but may buy one again in the future as a car gun since it is very affordable and worked good.
I see Taurus as a better choice for people on a budget then a Hi-point or Jimenez arms sub par gun.
 
UaDkLOY.jpg
My current Taurus is a 905 my wife bought for me a couple birthdays ago, and it's been great... but I've seen more than a few that weren't. The new Taurus's I've seen have been very nice in appearance, with trigger-pulls comparable to new S&W. These days I'll consider a Taurus if it's at a good price, but I'll inspect the ever-loving crap out of it before I plunk down any money.
 
My experiences come from eight years selling and servicing, fifteen years owning and a lot of years shooting. Selling....lots of returns, primarily of small frame revolvers due to timing issues, lockup, and heavy trigger pulls. Customer service spotty. Judges almost always come with vastly oversize chamber throats, not one of which would Taurus correct. They lead horribly with 45 Colt lead bullets. Autos are, for the most part, reliable, accurate and serviceable. Large frame revolvers are normally good. I own a Tracker 17 and it is the most accurate 100 yard revolver I have ever shot, regularly producing sub MAO groups for the whole cylinder full. Parts, forget it. Call in the order, give your card number and get lied to. "Ship today". Three months later you get your backordered part.
94 models have the heaviest triggers available on 22s today. An old, old one in the safe is great. Too bad all the urban legend crap about crossbreeding with S and W in the 70s was just that. As bad as Smith was then, they make T look worse.
I'd take a big frame, a Tracker, or a PT model any day. No small frames for me.
Their prices have risen way faster than their quality.
 
When I returned to shooting, after a multi-year break, I purchased a Taurus 617 Ti revolver and put several thousands of rounds through it. Only had one problem. After a year or so of not being shot, the factory lube hardened up, and locked it up. Took it apart, cleaned out the Heave duty Gear lube the factory used, re lubed and its worked fine since. Since then I've become a Smith and Wesson fan, so my Taurus does not get shot much anymore.
 
I purchased a Millenium G2 PT111 so I'm on the Taurus forum occasionally, and I have to say, some of the stories are scaring me - rear sight screws falling off, front sight heating up so much that it melts the surrounding polymer, RSA breaking, trigger breaking..

And this coming from Taurus owners who are very forgiving of Taurus problems.

Yikes
 
Had a lot of Taurus pistols/revolvers. I used to advocate for Taurus until all of the Taurus guns I had went belly-up. It done with 'em. Have one model 92 in .357...so far, so good.
 
Taurus 85CH was one of the best handguns I ever owned. Completely reliable, shot to point of aim. Like an idiot, I traded it.
 
I have two Taurus' a 22LR revolver and a .380 mouse gun. No issues function wise. Are they a piece of craftsmanship? Well, no. But thats pretty obvious when you consider the price. But piece of junk, no. I have had more issues with KelTec's!
 
I see a LOT of bashing of Taurus handguns and I don't know where it comes from.

I currently own 4 Taurus handguns and have had several other Taurus handguns.


What I currently own:

Taurus Raging Bull 444SS6 - I really like the gun and have never had one issue with it.

Taurus Model 66 SS 6" - I really like this one too, it shoots just as good as my GP100 6".

Taurus Model 94 - Got this revolver for a song, shoots really good, but has a really heavy DA trigger.

Taurus PT1911 Stainless - I am surprised at how accurate this gun is. I have shot a few hundred rounds with no FTEs or FTFs.


Taurus handguns I used to own.

Taurus PT111-G2 - Surprisingly great gun for the $230 I spent on it. Only downsides were the finish was too delicate and it having a manual safety.

Taurus PT1911 - Nice 1911, just was not crazy about the parkerized finish. Very accurate.

Taurus Model 66 SS - An older 6 shooter Model 66 that I bought and sold right away. Was going to keep it, but a buddy of mine really wanted it, so I sold it to him. He said it shoots great.

Taurus PT92AFS - Shot good, no jams, I just liked my Beretta 92FS INOX better.

I have owned 8 Taurus handguns and none were the crap people make them out to be. I talked to a guy that said he would NEVER own one, and he has never owned one before. I love how people are "experts" from Internet folly.

Do I think Taurus handguns are the greatest, no, but they are definitely a great gun for the price.
 
I used to have a PT101 40 s&w which is a copy of a Beretta 92. It was a very good pistol. Had to sell it due to finances.
I don't care for the Taurus revolvers. Their QC is spotty.
 
I have an '82 vintage (IIRC) 6" 669. It's OK. I bought it used. The finish isn't pristine but I can tell it was drop dead pretty in it's day. Does everything a revolver is supposed to do, looks good doing it. I've since moved on to S&W but just haven't been able to bring myself to get rid of it.

When I bought it (I think 2009) I figured that any issues had already been addressed. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top