Its time to face up to reality. Romenys record on guns is worse than Obama's.
I don't like posting on these kind of threads, but this statement is
blatantly, demonstrably false. It is simply not true. Repeating it again and again does not make it true. It is a lie that has been spread by the anti-gun crowd for the express purpose of confusing gun owners.
I think some of the folks who post this are simply mislead, but I suspect others like Obama for other reasons and want to confuse us about his record and philosophy on guns.
Romney supported and passed what he did in MA out of compromise because he's a politician, and the bill, though bad in some ways, was actually more positive to to MA gun owners in general. Romney is not a "gun guy" like Ryan; it's not his issue, and I don't see him personally being particularly either pro or anti.
Obama on the other hand, is anti-gun to his very core. A minimal amount of research will quickly show that he has supported every single anti-gun idea that has ever come his way. The only reason he hasn't pushed it in the last four years is because there is no political will in congress at this time, and to do so would be political suicide. That's why he promised Sarah Brady that he would do all he could for gun control "under the radar".
Two more hard-core anti-gun judges on the Supreme Court are a pretty big deal in my book, actually far, far worse in the long run than just pushing some anti-gun bills. Can you even imagine a couple more? To say this doesn't matter is disingenuous at the least, and really makes me question your motives.
If you like Obama for other reasons, please just say so. It's OK to say you're voting for him for whatever other reason, and that's more important to you than guns. At least that would be honest.