This poster was spposed to have a gun in it...

Status
Not open for further replies.
I didnt like it.
The color contrast attracts attention but doesnt resolve what its there for.
The headline is misleading. They dont "steal" your home. They do pay you for it. You dont have much choice about but thats another matter.
I would focus more on the idea that homeownership rights include the right to sell or not sell and the Supremes have taken that away. Maybe a house with a piece missing would make the point?
 
A gun in the picture would only reinforce the sterotype that gun owners are itching for chance to shoot it out with the government.
A gun in the picture would only convey the inevitable. The local government can now criminally take away your home (this supreme court action is criminal). And all citizens are vulnerable.

A gun is needed. Petitions, appeals, phone calls and flyers have failed. :mad:
 
I have a larger image at home, the upload was delayed by my migration to the new server. Will upload it in a day or two.
 
To jnojr

When people hold up a Bible and start screaming "They're after me because of my faith!", I lose sympthy and interest very quickly. I wasn't even able to get far enough into their tale to decide if they have a legitimate beef, or if this is more along the lines of "The law has no right to tell me I can't have eleven 14-year-old wives!"

If anyone seems to be screaming about something, maybe it is you, jnojr. My oh my, aren't we sensitive. What are the exclamation marks for?

I searched again on the front page of the link I gave, and I couldn't find any mention of the word, Bible, nor anyone holding one, nor anyone screaming about it. I couldn't find anywhere that the man was claiming that he wanted to have eleven 14 yr old wives either. Doesn't it seem a little exaggerated for you to talk about it like that?

You really ought to calm down and deal with things on a case by case basis and not generalize so much.

It is really unfortunate that you can't get past someone else's faith to see what the real problem is, an out of control abusive local government regulating every aspect of someone else's life.

As a matter of fact, I'm surprised that the guy could respond as he did to the abuse of the local government. How would you respond to your 'government' doing this to you? Just try to imagine he doesn't have a Bible in his hand screaming, if that will help you.

http://www.familiesthatwork.org/our_story.html

For 11 years I had been contracting as a house mover, and throughout January 2003, I was watched around 30 hours a week by L&I inspectors. In February, I received fines of $34,000. for “employing” two of my boys (then 11 and almost 14) and subjecting them to an “unreasonable risk,” primarily working on my own property. They claimed that if I did “engage, suffer, or permit” my children to do “appreciable work” for a “family enterprise,” except for agricultural or domestic labor in and around my private home, I had “employed” them, even if it was while training the child. Their penalties were:

$1000/day for “to work during school hours” even though we home-school.

$1000/day to work “without an order from a superior court judge.”

$1000/day for them “to work more than ten feet above the ground level.”

$1000/day for them “to work on a construction site” (our private property).

$1000/day for them “to work in the proximity of [our] heavy equipment.”

$1000/day for them “to operate a [our] bulldozer and backhoe.”

$1000/day for being a “helper on a public roadway.”

$1000/day for “no valid Minor Work Permit”

$1000/day for “no Parent/School Authorization” form signed.

CPS agents, working with L&I, then tried to abduct my son, Zach, while he was with me in the L&I building. Next, L&I got a Court Order to keep my children off all work sites, off all equipment, and less than ten feet off the ground, and it “directed …all persons in active concert…to remove” my boys from any work site or equipment! Remember, I owned the work site! Can you imagine that a neighbor or police can now forcibly remove your child from your family business and private property because they worked with their dad?

Things don't look good in the good ole USA, and the decision about eminent domain is no surprise to me, it is just that they are getting around to 'legalizing' their theft of private property.
 
A gun in the picture would only reinforce the sterotype that gun owners are itching for chance to shoot it out with the government.

Maybe the argument can be made that...that was the point?

Unfortunately it seems like we're narrowed down to "either or" situations where you're either a nutcase that's trying to stand up to an unjust government by illustrating lethal force... or you're a pacifist who will lay down and take it.

Is there a middle ground to this? Writing emails and calling your reps and Senators doesn't seem to speak loudly enough nowadays. All I get for my efforts are generic template responses.
 
My take on the image...

You need two images...

Left side the house, happy family playing in the yard, whatever.

Right side, a starbucks, something like that, businessman yelling at a taxi driver...

Now for the tricky part. There needs to be a water tower, trees, or _something_ in the background of both that will merge the two images. Photoshop'll do it.
 
I agree with Bogie as to putting a family on the left side, showing who is really being affected by the eminent domain decision.

But, I wouldn't necessarily put a business on the right side.

I think the real culprits are the bureaucrats who make these decisions in their planning sessions. Maybe you could put a picture of a building with Town Hall on it, or a picture of the Supreme Court on the other side. That is ultimately where the problem is coming from.
 
For what its worth, Local Government could always steal your home, they just had to do it for "public use" and with "just compensation".
 
I think the courts have simpy broadened the definition of "public use" as it pertains to taking over private property.
 
you don't have to use a gun.
There are the hand held 10 million candle power spotlights,
bullhorns, and all sorts of fun, non lethal ways to chase people off your land at 3 in the morning, or whenever the hired goons of the city come, the gun is the last option and we should think of it as such, but when it is needed, and it will be needed, we must be ready.
I don't know how to convey that belief in a poster, so I say leave it out.

just my 2 cents.
 
I fiddled with it a bit...
(apologies to Oleg :p )


attachment.php
 
Last edited:
Ah, the joys of photoshop...

Been thinking...

Put a car in front, spanning the center (and both sides) of the photo. The "left" side, is the happy family side, and the car is just a normal car parked on the street. As the photo transitions to the "business" side (has to be a business, and not a government facility, because the decision was not about use of eminent domain re government use, but around the government seizing property and then allowing private developers use), where you've got your Starbucks, and the green auto turns into a yellow taxi with the trunk open, and the taxi driver and businessman obviously having an obnoxious argument.

A powerline or an obviously identical treeline can span the rear portion of the photo... That way we tie the two sections together in both the front and the back.
 
Oookay... Another idea...

Make both sides in an urban area... Picture window in the center, happy yupsters coming out of the door on the left, taxi in front again, and on the right, have the window turn into the interior of a Starbucks.

Yeah, I've got something about starbucks. So?
 
How about a picture of a fully armed SWAT Team escourting a family out of the house and a sign with "Future location of _ _ _ _ _ " along with your other wording.
 
photo definitely needs a gun in it

I have friends who I've argued with for years about the RKBA. Now, eminent domain has them telling me "I think you were right. You were right all along." If you can't show an image of someone defending their home with a firearm...if you can't create an image that conveys a positive message about life, liberty, and property with a homeowner in mock-defense of his home, then you may as well turn in your guns, because the 2nd amendment is meaningless.

This is the chance to convey to the non-gun owners what our message has been all along. The 2nd amendment serves as a protection against abuse at the hands of our own government. If you can't sell that message now, then trust me, you never will be able to.

Eminent Domain. Molon Labe. .
 
meekly fleeing your homestead

If your goal is to draw attention to the aoutrageous ruling of Kelo vs. New London, then you definitely want a gun in the image. Reason? It draws attention to a controversial subject. (There's no such thing as bad publicity.) Otherwise, without the guns, you may as well just show the family slinking away, crawling in a mini-van, and driving away. Because, without guns, you have no recourse. The guns ARE the message people. Hello? Does anyone else get this? Now is the time to be radical. Pull out the hardware and make some shocking images. That will get this story the attention it deserves. Not some innocuous half-gray house with a starbucks with 2.1 kids in the yard.

As for the post that said Iminent Domain wasn't stealing, they must not have studied many cases. We had a guy here in Broomfield, Colorado that they broke like a rented mule. Paid him $2 Million for his land, that was appraised as $12 Million. So, do you consider shorting someone $10 Million theft? I would. Considering that it's a felony to steal like...what is it...$500.00?
 
Oleg,

Excellent pic, I like the new direction you're taking your work. It's very important that people understand the threat to freedom in so many other areas.

I think the best objective here is to make people aware of this new threat and to get them angry about it. It's far better to let them connect the dots as far as firearms go, let them take the active role in making that connection as opposed to stuffing it in their face.

I think showing the family having a barbecue on one side with them being forcibly escorted out with the "Future home of Walmart" sign would work pretty well.
 
Or how about

a sweet little old granny with a full auto MP5 mowing down the bulldozer crew that shows up? C'mon please, just for me? I need a new desktop picture! :)
CT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top