ontarget
Member
That's awesome.Not 1000, but, my then 6 year old grandson nailed 750 on his first shot. https://i.imgur.com/HRhCSBc.mp4
That's awesome.Not 1000, but, my then 6 year old grandson nailed 750 on his first shot. https://i.imgur.com/HRhCSBc.mp4
Well, let's put it this way: it may not take specialized equipment to occasionally ring a fat gong at 1000 yd when firing from a rest. But hitting a 10 inch X-Ring from the prone position with IRON SIGHTS damnwell takes specialized equipment. Shown here are a couple rifles I used in the Wimbledon Cup match at Camp Perry over the years and other tournaments. Both are .300 Win Mag, bottom is built by Jim Cloward (Who won the Wimbledon one year.) on Roy Dunlap stock design, Shilen DGA SS action. Top is on Pre-60 M-70 action, marksman style stock. Warner rears on both. Equipment used in today's competitions are even more specialized.I’ve just never understood what makes guys think it takes specialized equipment to hit targets at 1,000yrds?
I think this is really worth restating - as it drives two variant opinions of folks who haven’t ever done it, at opposite ends of the spectrum.
1) The overly confident newbie has never laid eyes on 1,000yrds, so he is certain his $400 16” S&W M&P-15 Sport with a $150 Nikon 3-9x can punch milk jugs all day at 1,000yrds with cheap surplus ammo.
2) The overly cautious newbie who has never fired at 1,000yrds convinced himself he can’t reach any target at 1k without a $5000 custom rifle and a $2500 optic on top - out of reach for their budget.
So one believes too much is possible, the other believes too little... Neither are right, but there’s a lot of happiness for a lot of shooters in the middle between their perceptions.
My first 1,000yrd shooting experience as a kid was a standard Ruger M77 MkII 30-06, running a 7lb factory trigger, with a Tasco World Class 4-16x44mm, and shooting factory Winchester Supreme Ballistic Silvertip 150grn, with a low to mid-0.4 BC and only 2950fps and an ES of 40. Didn’t know any of that back then, didn’t have a ballistic calculator or a chronograph, nor a laser rangefinder. I just knew how to watch for splash and make corrections on my scope to bring the hits onto target (which had to be done with a coin). It has a new scope, new trigger, and a new stock, but I still shoot that rifle to 1,000, over 20yrs later.
Definitely a DING. But sometimes they go DONG.
Competition isn’t the only 1,000yrd shooting done in the world.
I've been outed! The horror!Well mine clang and ocassionally dong. You must be using some under powered sissy rifle like a 308.
The truth comes for all of us eventually...I've been outed! The horror!
Well, let's put it this way: it may not take specialized equipment to occasionally ring a fat gong at 1000 yd when firing from a rest. But hitting a 10 inch X-Ring from the prone position with IRON SIGHTS damnwell takes specialized equipment. Shown here are a couple rifles I used in the Wimbledon Cup match at Camp Perry over the years and other tournaments. Both are .300 Win Mag, bottom is built by Jim Cloward (Who won the Wimbledon one year.) on Roy Dunlap stock design, Shilen DGA SS action. Top is on Pre-60 M-70 action, marksman style stock. Warner rears on both. Equipment used in today's competitions are even more specialized.View attachment 782669 View attachment 782670 View attachment 782671
Varminterror,
Even though you referred to me as a Snowflake many moons ago (I think it's funny)
delete
The original was much better...
The second saddest thing in this thread has to be @Jack B. Comment that he is not interested. How can one not be interested when ones avatar is an artillery piece. That doesn't come close to the diabetes thing, but it is a bit disheartening.