Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Transporting guns on Amtrak

Discussion in 'Legal' started by 38snapcaps, Oct 18, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 38snapcaps

    38snapcaps Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2003
    Messages:
    292
    My daughter lives on the other side of the side, about two hours by train.
    I have a concealed handgun permit for my State.

    We usually drive to see her, and may stay a weekend. The traffic (NW of Detroit) is terrible and we are considering taking the train and have her pick us up at the train station.

    How am I supposed to transport my pistol considering its against the law to have a firearm on a passenger train?
     
  2. wdlsguy

    wdlsguy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2004
    Messages:
    2,880
    Location:
    TX
    As far as I know, it isn't against the law to have a handgun on a train in Michigan, but it is against Amtrack policy. I would find another way to get there. Whatever you do, don't try to check it without telling them.
     
    Last edited: Oct 18, 2006
  3. Trebor

    Trebor Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2003
    Messages:
    4,817
    Amtrak is a quasi-Federal agency and runs under federal regs. They prohibit passengers from carrying weapons. I believe they are now also conducting searches for weapons. You'd have to check on their policy on weapons in baggage.
     
  4. cloudedice

    cloudedice Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    278
    Location:
    CT
    I found this on the Virginia Citizens Defense League website, dated 7/24/06. I bolded the most important bits.

    http://www2.vcdl.org/cgi-bin/wspd_cgi.sh/vcdl/vadetail.html?RECID=958752&FILTER=
     
  5. Manedwolf

    Manedwolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    3,693
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Yeah, figures. Seems like more and more, the only way to get 2A rights to protect your family is to be a cop.
     
  6. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Our hard-earned tax dollars at play on behalf of socialism.
     
  7. 'Card

    'Card Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,506
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    I ride Amtrak on a pretty regular basis. In my opinion, for regional travel (say a 2-5 hour trip) it beats flying hands down.

    I would never encourage or advise anyone to violate the law or Amtrak's regulations, but I would say that neither I nor my luggage (both checked and carry-on) have ever been scanned, probed, x-rayed, searched, questioned, or examined while boarding, riding, or departing an Amtrak train. I've also never witnessed anyone else being examined. In fact, I don't think I've ever so much as seen a metal detector at an Amtrak station.

    Take it for what it's worth.
     
  8. Car Knocker

    Car Knocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,809
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Amtrak police? Must be an East Coast thing.
     
  9. junyo

    junyo Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    719
    Never even been asked to produce ID, let alone searched. And I ride the Philly/DC/Richmond corridor all the time.
     
  10. the 22 junkie

    the 22 junkie Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    267
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Passenger trains? What the heck are those things? :p :confused:
     
  11. Manedwolf

    Manedwolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    3,693
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    On the east coast, they're generally a device for going somewhere slowly at great expense while getting a panoramic view of the worst parts of American cities. Bonus for the excitement of smashing into a truck at a rural crossing, extra bonus for being thrown from your seat/bunk/out of the train entirely when it hits another train. Extra double bonus if the other train hit is tank cars of flammable and/or toxic chemicals.

    Acela is the one exception, but I'd rather take a plane.
     
  12. DogBonz

    DogBonz Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,068
    Location:
    NJ
    Amtrak?...

    I'm not advising you to break any laws, but form experience, amtrak doesn't check bags, especially carry on's. Over the last year I have taken Amtrak from NYC to Boston almost every weekend to work on a consulting project in bean town. I have only once seen someone searched, and that was because he was very drunk, belligerent to the crew, and threatened them. I have never been even asked for ID. My girlfriend got my ticket for me once, and not knowing how to use the ticket machine, it had HER NAME on it. The conductor looked at the ticket, looked at me, looked at the ticked, punched it, and walked away. If it is not illegal, I wouldn’t worry about a conductor “making” you.
     
  13. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,769
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    Another vote for driving, even at today's gas prices. My vehicle, my rules. I rode the BART in San Francisco, and the "L" in Chicago, and have no interest in being on another commuter train.
     
  14. IN>IL

    IN>IL Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    74
    Amtrak

    I have literally been a passenger on Amtrak a thousand times... five days a week for the past seven years, and I have never ever had any sort of search. I regularly carry on board trains, and in fact preventing an attack on another passenger by a drunk who took a hammer out of his bag. The Amtrak Police, whom I didn't know existed, thanked me for my help and NEVER mentioned that firearms are not allowed on trains.

    Not that I am telling you to break the law, just my experience!
     
  15. michaelbane

    michaelbane Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Messages:
    149
    Location:
    Philadelphia, PA
    TSA at 30th Street Station/Amtrak Police

    TSA was at 30th Street Station in Philadelphia for a few days this past spring. They were searching for explosives. Window dressing, if you ask me.

    As for those who are surpised that Amtrak has a police force, yes they do. They're just like any other railroad police department. They're more prevalent on the East Coast because that's where the bulk of Amtrak's business is.
     
  16. Autolycus

    Autolycus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,456
    Location:
    In the land of make believe.
    After the train bombings in Spain they started searching people more often. I took the Amtrak down to school a couple of times and I got on at Union Station in Chicago and got off in Carbondale IL. They had K9 officers. I dont know if the dogs can smell the gun powder in the bullets or on the gun but I chose not to risk it in Chicago. Either way it is a law that really needs to be repealed.

    However on the Amtrak I noticed that the baggage was stored at the back of the car so someone could easily walk off with your luggage. Or they could rummage through it as well. I really felt uncomfortable with that setup. I assume that if you get a sleeper you will be better off.
     
  17. 'Card

    'Card Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    1,506
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    If taking Amtrak would require overnight travel, I'll generally fly. But for regional stuff? I like Amtrak a lot.

    For example, I have to travel to DC occasionally. It takes about 5 hours to get there driving, and then I have to fight the (insane) DC traffic. Flying takes about 5 hours (only 1.5 of which are you actually in the air) once you factor in all the security hassles and getting your luggage - and pray they don't lose it. On Amtrak, it costs a lot less, I'm standing in Union Station (right downtown) in about 4 and half hours, it's a pleasant trip through some nice country, and I take my laptop along and usually get a lot of work done on the way. What's not to like about that?
     
  18. Leatherneck

    Leatherneck Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,545
    Location:
    No. Virginia and Northern Neck
    I'm assuming you don't travel with a firearm, right 'Card?

    Union station with a weapon in your tote is not a good situation to be in.

    TC
     
  19. S4Lee

    S4Lee Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    147
    Location:
    Meadowlands, NJ
    In light of the local news stories about Amtrack beefing up security, I started wondering if a bomb-sniffing dog would detect gunpowder residue, and decided to look up Amtrack's policy on thier site. Interestingly enough, I found this:

    "All travel on, and transactions with, Amtrak is governed by the laws of the District of Columbia, United States of America, without regards to its principles of conflicts of law. You agree to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of any State or Federal court located in the District of Columbia, United States of America, and waive any jurisdictional, venue or inconvenient forum objections to such courts."
    http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/Conte...opy_Page&c=am2Copy&cid=1093554049471&ssid=149

    So, now I'm wondering what the outcome of Heller vs. DC would be on travel on Amtrack? :D

    On a side note, they have really gone out of their way to establish a "First Amendment Policy":
    http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/Conte...opy_Page&c=am2Copy&cid=1093554044354&ssid=462

    I would love to see how thier "Second Amendment Policy" would read (complete with "In Amtrak's interest...." bullet points from the PDF).
     
  20. Nate C.

    Nate C. Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    408
    Location:
    Tejas
    I never had any problems on Amtrak on the LA-to-San Diego run. It was quite pleasant and relaxing, especially when you could look out the window and see the gridlock. I made that trip a number of times over the course of several years.
     
  21. Technosavant

    Technosavant Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,011
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    There was a news story on local TV last night about increasing security at the St. Louis Amtrak depot.

    Apparently as near as I can figure, they are worried about:
    1) Hijacking the train and taking it to Cuba or someplace else. If somebody has a gun, they might take that thing God knows where.
    2) Suicide bombers. Because, you know, nobody could EVER truck a bomb out into the wilderness and rig it up on a trestle and blow it as the train went by, instead of putting it on board.
    3) Rowdy passengers. Because disarming everybody is the best way to deal with someone who MIGHT get out of control. I guess I missed all the stories about people freaking out at an altitude of 8 feet and a speed of 80mph, where opening a door could ruffle the passengers' hair.

    I can understand a basic need for security at some places, but this is nothing more than feel-good security; it won't make any actual difference in the true safety of the passengers. And from the article, it appears to be working at making people feel all warm and fuzzy.
     
  22. oldjeeps

    oldjeeps Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2007
    Messages:
    11
    On a marginally related note, in Michigan (especially the Port Huron to Chicago line) Amtrak doesn't get you very far in two hours.
    Last time I was on it was to Chicago and I probably could have driven it faster.
     
  23. Aguila Blanca

    Aguila Blanca Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,693
    Even being a cop is no help. The Amtrak policy only allows police to carry if they are on official business.

    Sic transit LEO national concealed carry. As a practical matter, of course, I seriously doubt the Arlington or Amtrak police would roust a brother officer, despite the policy being crystal clear that off-duty police carry is not allowed.
     
  24. esq_stu

    esq_stu Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    966
    Location:
    Michigan
    The quote in #5 above does not say whether the person charged with anything. For all we know, someone saw the gun, freaked out, called the police, and the police did what police do. If I carried in a store and someone saw my gun, they might also call the police and I might also be accosted and questioned.

    If it's not unlawful to carry, then it seems to me the most they can do is ask you to leave if they discover you carrying. Which is how it would work if you enter a store in Michigan with a "no guns" sign. If it's not unlawful, I agree with "don't ask don't tell." I don't know the laws of train travel, so I won't venture an opinion.
     
  25. Autolycus

    Autolycus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,456
    Location:
    In the land of make believe.
    It is illegal to carry on Amtrak.

    To clarify my old post...

    I cannot carry here in Illinois. Even on the train I did not want to stick a pistol case in my bag or any ammo as I was leaving Chicago. I believe that it is illegal to CCW on Amtrak anywhere.

    As far as LEOs go, I am not sure. I would check www.officer.com and do a search for Amtrak.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page