UK Gun Laws

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seems I remember a UK farmer who confronted 2 thugs who'd broken into his house at night, and he filled one with buckshot. The farmer went to prison on criminal assault charges, then lost his farm to the thug in the civil trial.

I think I'll stay right here in Alabama, especially with our new Castle Doctrine law.
 
In the UK, a person may use 'reasonable force' to protect himself or to prevent a crime being commited. This is open to interpretation by the courts and the police.

For instance, there was a case of one Tony Martin who shot two burglars as they were running away. Because they were running away, and no danger to him, it was not self-defence. He was using force to prevent a crime (the theft of his property) but the judge ruled that lethal force was not 'reasonable' over a stolen VCR or somesuch when he himself was not threatened. Tony could have avoided prison simply by saying sorry and that he regretted killing the burglar, however he refused, so he ended up in jail for a time. However, I know a man who shot a pair of thieves who were trying to run him over, and he wasn't even taken to court, the police said it was obviously self-defence.

In the UK, we don't have anything like 'duty to retreat'. In general, if someone means to do you harm in your own home, you can pretty much do as you like as long as it's not torture or anything like that.

There are no special rules on firearms when used for self-defence in your own home. However, you cannot take one into a public place (like the street) unless you have 'good reason or lawful authority'. Self-defence is not considered 'good reason' in the UK, so you can't carry a firearm with you just in case you get attacked.

However, a person also has the right, in fact the duty, to 'restore the Queen's peace'. This might be quelling a riot, dispersing an angry mob, making people move on if they are being threatening etc. When one is restoring the Queen's peace, one is said to have 'lawful authority', so in this case, you could legally take a firearm into a public place for self-defence and that of others.

Personally, I'm not too worried about this part of the law. No jury will lock you up for killing someone who meant you harm. Just make sure you don't shoot if they're running away and make sure you show remorse in court (if you get there) and everything should be fine.
The problem for me is that when I leave my home, I have no tools to defend myself with, and that even when I am at home, I'm forced to use a levergun to protect myself, instead of the Glock 20 with holosight that I'd prefer.
 
1996: Handguns to be banned in the UK
The British Government has announced plans to outlaw almost all handguns following the shocking massacre at Dunblane in Scotland.
On 13 March Thomas Hamilton walked into the gym at Dunblane primary school and killed 16 young children and their teacher. He also injured 13 other children and three teachers. Hamilton, a former scout master, then shot himself.

Today's announcement follows publication of Lord Cullen's inquiry into the massacre which concluded Hamilton's horrific attack could not have been predicted.

But it made 23 recommendations to tighten rules on gun ownership and monitor those who work with children.

The proposal to ban all handguns - except .22-caliber target pistols - would leave Britain with some of the toughest laws on private possession of guns.


Isn't it time to conclude that, literally and metaphorically, the game is up for handguns now?


Tory MP David Mellor




Home Secretary Michael Howard told a packed House of Commons he would make sure the measures were passed as quickly as possible through parliament.

But the move has angered both those for and against private gun ownership.

The Snowdrop Campaign, set up by victims' families after Dunblane, wants to see a total ban on handguns and called the plan an "unacceptable compromise".

The opposition Labour Party welcomed the report and the government's swift reaction to it but urged ministers to bring about a complete ban.

Shadow Home Secretary Jack Straw said politicians should have acted in a similar vein nine years ago after the Hungerford massacre.

Former Tory cabinet minister David Mellor also felt the proposals did not go far enough.

He asked: "Isn't it time to conclude that, literally and metaphorically, the game is up for handguns now?"

But gun club owners warned thousands of jobs would be in jeopardy if the proposal became law.

Speaking to the Daily Mirror newspaper, Ross Armstrong, owner of Medway Shooting Club in Kent said: "People are killed by drunk drivers but no-one demands a ban on cars. Further restrictions suit no-one."
 
Well, I'll stick with our new Castle Doctrine. If someone finds himself in my house uninvited, or if someone tries to carjack me, I can eliminate the threat and not worry about criminal charges OR civil charges.
 
Seems I remember a UK farmer who confronted 2 thugs who'd broken into his house at night, and he filled one with buckshot. The farmer went to prison on criminal assault charges, then lost his farm to the thug in the civil trial.

I think I'll stay right here in Alabama, especially with our new Castle Doctrine law.

Tony Martin,the farmer that you mentioned,used an unlicensed
Winchester pump-action shotgun,to blast Fred Barrars and his accomplice Brendan with.Those crooks were known as Pikeys or in the USA,Trailer trash,who scrounge off of the welfare state and who seldom work.
 
I never shot much .22 pistol, but strangely the 1997 ban on them made me angrier than the 1996 ban on centerfire pistol (which I used a lot) because even by the antis' crazed, warped logic, it makes no sense. They ban guns because they kill people, that's stupid but you can sort of see where they're coming from, but .22s don't kill people!
 
Gunman in combat gear kills himself after 14 die in shooting spree

Gareth Parry, Aileen Ballantyne and Dennis Johnson
Thursday August 20, 1987
The Guardian


A berserk gunman who stalked through the quiet town of Hungerford , Berkshire, shooting dead 14 people and wounding another 14 killed himself last night after being besieged by police. A muffled shot was heard just after 7 pm inside the school in the town where he had been surrounded by armed police. It was the end of an horrific episode of inexplicable violence visited on the town by a local man identified by the police as Michael Ryan, aged 27.

Article continues

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

His victims included his own mother and an unarmed traffic policeman, named last night as PC Roger Bereton, aged 41, a married man with two teenage sons.
The youngest casualty was a 14-year-old girl, Lisa Mildenhall, who was shot in both legs. She was in a hospital intensive care unit last night, fighting for her life.

The killer who brought terror to the historic market town wore Rambo-style army combat gear as he strutted through the sunny streets, firing two guns at random, sending children and shoppers running screaming for cover.

The trail of killings began at the Savernake Forest, about 10 miles from Hungerford , where the body of a young woman was discovered. Two small children stood nearby whimpering but unhurt.

Then the gunman made his way to his own home in the town. The house was set ablaze, his mother's body lying inside as the fire spread through the terrace of four homes.

Firing indiscriminately, Ryan then ran amok, leaving bloodshed in his wake. An 84-year-old man was gunned down in his own garden drivers were shot dead in their vehicles cars crashed as they tried desperately to escape the gunfire. Seen people were left lying in one street close to Ryan's home.

The Princess Margaret hospital in Swindon was swiftly turned into an emergency centre as ambulances from Berkshire and Wiltshire brought in the wounded.

Before Ryan shot himself, specialist police siege negotiators and marksmen surrounding the John O'Gaunt secondary school in Hungerford had managed to contact him with the intention of persuading him to surrender.

Ryan was seen at a window of the school, brandishing a hand grenade with the pin removed.

The shooting began shortly after midday when a man driving a silver-coloured vauxhall Astra car fired shots at a cashier at the Golden Arrow service station on the A4 at Croxfield, six miles west of Hungerford and across the county boundary in Wiltshire. She was unhurt.

The car drove off at speed, and Thames Valley police were alerted. A few minutes later, at brigade were called to a blaze in Fairview Road, but were unable to get near to douse the flames. Ryan, brandishing two guns, came out of the house into streets crowded with market-day shoppers, firing indiscriminately. A body was later found in the house.

Unarmed Thames valley police officers, in search of the Astra car, came face to face with the gunman. Eye-witnesses said that Ryan, tall, of medium build, fair and bearded, came out of the house looking as if he was 'just going for a walk. '

Mrs Jennifer Hibberd, of Fairview Road, said: 'He was just strolling around very calmly and shooting. ' She said she had come face to face with Ryan, whom she knows, just as her father arrived home.

She dragged her father inside to join her and her 14-year-old daughter, then telephoned her older daughter and husband at work, warning them not to come home. 'I believe his mother is dead inside the house,' she said.

She said that one of the victims was a woman who was driving her daughter to visit a relative. 'He just emptied the shotgun into the car. The woman had blood on her. Her daughter was leaning over her with her head down. She managed to reverse down the road. Oh God I hope she's all right. '

Mrs Barbara Morley, another witness of the killings - one of the bloodiest massacres in Britain - said: 'He was just strolling along the road, shooting at anything that moved. '

In all, 12 people were killed in Hungerford High Street as Ryan, an antiques dealer and member of a local gun club, fired at random.

One was named as Mr Marcus Barnard, a taxi driver, who died four weeks after celebrating the birth of his first baby. His wife heard the shots ring out outside their home 50 yards away, but she was unaware that her husband had been shot dead through the window of his taxi.

In a house less than 30 yards down the street from the fire in Fairview Road, police comforted a Mrs Carr, aged 81, whose husband, aged 84, lay dead in the garden.

Mrs Carr, in tears, said: 'I heard him go out into the garden and I heard a couple of shots. My husband groaned and started calling out my name. I could see him lying there with wounds on his side, under his arm and in his back.

'All I wanted to do was go outside in the garden and cover him with blankets, but I could not get out because there were shots ringing around. '

Inside the house, police emotions were running high and several officers were close to tears when they heard that an unarmed officer had been shot.

Witnesses said that as Ryan fired he reloaded from a bag of cartridges on the chest of his sleeveless flak jacket.

As officers trained in the use of firearms were called in, many of the wounded were understood to be lying in Hungerford High Street unattended because the gunman shot at anyone who moved.

The town was sealed off. At one time the pavements were scattered with the bodies of the dead and badly injured.

Ambulancewoman Hazel Haslitt, aged 31, and her partner, Linda Bright, said that Ryan opened fire on them as they tried to tend his victims. Mrs Haslitt said: 'We were about to turn into the street when we saw this man pointing a rifle at us. Then we heard him fire and the bullet ricocheted off our windscreen. I said: 'Drive on. There is no way we are going down there. We are not heroes and we have four children between us. '

At 1.20pm, a few miles away, near Marlborough, Wiltshire, the two were found wandering lost in Savernake Forest by a passerby. At 2pm, police found the body of their mother, who had been shot. The woman was in her twenties, and police confirmed that they believed this and the Hungerford incident were linked.

Police said that they had not been able to talk to the children much: 'All they can say is that mummy has been shot. '

Officers contained Ryan in the High Street area. British Telecom shut down all telephone lines to the town.

By 6pm, Ryan, was cornered at John O'Gaunt school, surrounded by armed police and police helicopters.

The school caretaker, his two children and three maintenance staff were taking shelter in a house in the school grounds. The caretaker, Mr John Miles, said that his wife had phoned him at work to tell him about the shootings. 'The next thing I knew two terrified kids came riding up the road on bicycles shouting, 'there's a man with a gun. '

'I rushed out to warn some workmen working outside my bungalow, which is near to the school. Then we saw this man wearing army-type clothes walking up the drive to the school. My two kids and I crouched behind bushes with the workmen - we could see him but he did not see us.

'He has some sort of rifle slung over his shoulder and what I think was a hand gun. To say I was scared is an understatement. My first reaction was to get myself and the children into the house. We locked all the doors and windows and lay on the floor. That is when I really began to feel scared. I started shaking but after the house was secured I called the police. '

At the Princess Margaret hospital, all non-urgent traffic had meanwhile been diverted away from the main entrance by officials with walkie-talkies as ambulances brought in the casualties.

Eight of those admitted were said to be female, including three aged under 18.

About 6 pm two more victims, both men, were admitted. A man with shoulder and thigh injuries was detained and another, said to be less seriously hurt, was transferred.

This is how the anti-gun campaigners use incidents presented like this one,to ban guns
 
I have an unlicensed, loaded Mossberg 12 gauge, along with 2 unlicensed, loaded 9mm S&W pistols (among others) at my house. They're unlicensed because they don't have to be. I still live in a relatively free country. You blokes are telling a cautionary tale of how the anti's operate with their creeping incrementalism. Thanks. And thanks to our homegrown pro-gun bulldogs, the NRA.
 
I never shot much .22 pistol, but strangely the 1997 ban on them made me angrier than the 1996 ban on centerfire pistol (which I used a lot) because even by the antis' crazed, warped logic, it makes no sense. They ban guns because they kill people, that's stupid but you can sort of see where they're coming from, but .22s don't kill people!

The antis put pressure on Blair to ban all handguns,because the antis voted for him and it made sure that he stayed in office-once he became PM.Blair has recently had second thoughts about the 1997/98 ban,but his cronies and supporters,don't want to know about this though.

All Labour did,was finish off handguns for good,as did the Royal Navy do to Bismark-when the battleship was a burning carcass,by torpedoing it and sending it to the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean-or in this case to the smelting pot in the Birmingham proof-house.
 
Are there people in the UK who want even stricter restrictions.

Yep, the Gun Control Network. A few of them are campaigning for the banning of Replicas, including Airsoft guns and blank-firing guns, and any guns left over after the irresponsible bans of 1996/7.

Their website has some very extreme demands, including a ban on "human-shaped targets".

A few of their members went to a meeting held by the group Mothers Against (Illegal) Guns, and when Mike Yardley (A civilian firearms expert) came up and pointed out that the ban was wrong and meaningless in terms of crime, the GCN members assaulted him.

Never mind that he was telling the truth, though.

Seriously, the GCN put out so much sh**e, that if they fertilized crops with it, you could end world famine. They have never told the truth since they were formed.
 
'Ryan shot at me, then at my mother'
(Filed: 07/12/2004)


With violent crime a key political concern, the BBC has returned to Hungerford to make a film about the 1987 massacre. Elizabeth Grice asks why, and talks to survivors

Most of us think of the Hungerford massacre as a panorama of horror, unfolding like a film, in which a crazed gunman in full camouflage went on an afternoon's killing spree in his home town. Sixteen people were murdered by Michael Ryan that hot summer day in 1987. Fifteen were injured. He killed his mother, his neighbours and a policeman, pumping them full of bullets from a Kalashnikov with lunatic ferocity.


Alison Chapman was 16 when she was shot: the bullet is still in her body

Ryan set his house on fire and burned three others. Finally, holed up in the local school and surrounded by police marksmen, he shot himself. The retrospective narrative we know so well gives the whole thing a spurious unity. But for the people of the small Berkshire market town who were caught up in Ryan's terrible progress through Hungerford on August 19, there was no big picture, just a series of disjointed individual atrocities that made no sense.

Alison Chapman, then 16, heard what she thought was the cracking sound of workmen dropping scaffold poles. She was worried about the effect of the noise on her flighty mare, Buckskin, who was grazing nearby, so she and her mother, Linda, drove up towards Hungerford Common to check the horse. In South View, they saw a man in the road, standing beside a wrecked police car with a gun in his hand. Because of his camouflage uniform, they thought he was "something to do with the police".

"He pointed the gun at my side of the car and fired," Alison recalls. "It happened so quickly. A hot, burning sensation went through my leg and after that my body seemed to go into preservation mode. Then he started shooting at my mother. A bullet went through her shoulder. She was covered in glass and her throat was cut. Her face swelled up to twice its normal size. I have never seen anything so horrific. It looked as if she had been sprayed through a sieve with something red."

Ryan, "blank and expressionless", fired 11 bullets from his semi-automatic into their Volvo. The moment he paused to reload, Linda Chapman, with unbelievable presence of mind, reversed down the cul de sac and somehow managed to reach the doctor's surgery in her damaged car. One of Ryan's bullets had travelled through Alison's right thigh and into her lower back, destroying some of her nerves and removing a large piece of flesh. Her Wellington boot had filled with blood. Both women were deeply traumatised. Mrs Chapman, her windpipe constricted by the cut, spent two weeks in intensive care.

Alison Chapman is what the courts would term a reliable witness. There's no melodrama in her account, no bitterness or self pity, even though she has been left partially disabled and had to give up work three years ago. She has nightmares about Ryan. "In my most violent ones, I am being buried alive, chased through a wood, being stabbed or drowned or shut in a burning building. Sometimes I see Michael Ryan's face. When I wake, I am scared to go to sleep again."

The bullet is still in her body because to remove it would have risked paralysis. As a way of accommodating its inflammatory presence, she calls it Billy – "my little friend, my little foe". Immobilised by pain, she is sometimes confined to the house for several days and has to have help with simple tasks such as washing her hair. But she still feels lucky.

"Yes, it causes pain, but mostly I'm mobile. I've got a normal life. Other people went through very much worse. An experience like this makes you grateful for what you've got. We lost a lot of people we knew."


Pc Jim Wood: 'innocent people are still being killed by illegal weapons'
Alison Chapman, 33, now lives in the West Country with her husband, Richard, but many of her relatives are still in Hungerford. She consulted them before agreeing to take part in a BBC documentary about the Hungerford massacre to be shown tonight. None of them had any objections.

Hungerford is said to be in "uproar" about a programme that will inevitably open old wounds, but she thinks local distress has been exaggerated. Reassured that she would not be part of an exercise that tried to apportion blame, she was happy to contribute. "With something as unprecedented as this, you cannot lay blame," she says. "There is no manual on how to deal with something like Hungerford."

In fact, the programme resembles an extended version of a Crimewatch-type reconstruction. The short, stocky Ryan is played by a lean, unshaven actor. His depredations are intercut with the reminiscences of people he wounded or terrified, most of whom have not spoken before and seem happy to do so now.

"This is not a Rambo movie," says Simon Ford, executive producer. "It is a sensitive treatment of an important event. This was an iconic moment in recent British history and it repays looking at it again through the eyes of the victims. Many of them found it cathartic."

Outwardly, it takes a detached and chronological approach to a day of utter chaos, confusion and appalling unreadiness. The BT telephone exchange at Newbury was inadequate for the flood of 999 calls that catalogued Ryan's attacks. The Thames Valley tactical firearms squad were on a training exercise 40 miles away. The police helicopter was in for repair and had to be scrambled out of the workshop, at some risk to the pilot. "It was a very frightening scenario," admits the commanding officer, Charles Pollard, in the film.

Police communications were so woeful that for most of the operation Pollard (who had to travel 40 miles to Hungerford), had no idea where Michael Ryan was. Pollard says he felt "a ball of ice" in his stomach when he saw there were only two telephone lines at Hungerford police station, which was undergoing renovation.

He received nine separate reports of Ryan's whereabouts – but all the sightings conflicted. "You just hadn't any information," he said. "You hadn't a handle on it. I thought we had completely screwed up. I was powerless for most of the afternoon."

But he, too, was bewildered by the blitzkrieg of separate incidents and only the next morning, when the operation could be assessed against all the logistical frustrations and limitations, could he conclude: "Actually, we did OK."

The unhyped account of Ryan's murderous rampage comes from people who have all been scarred by it in some way – policemen, ambulance men, residents – people who at the time had no idea of the scale of destruction or that they were part of something unimaginably big.

Semi-automatic weapons were outlawed in Britain in 1988 as a result of Hungerford but nine years later there was Dunblane, where another loner, Thomas Hamilton, gunned down 16 children and their teacher in the gym of the local primary school. And late last year PC Ian Broadhurst was shot dead at point blank range in Leeds with a semi-automatic pistol believed to have been part of a consignment smuggled into Britain from Croatia.

The programme could have been used to point up lessons about the persistent inadequacy of gun control laws, but it is content to cite the 1988 Firearms Amendment Act as a positive outcome of the massacre. Its main message seems to be one of retrospective outrage: Michael Ryan harboured an arsenal of legal weaponry and look what happened.


Adrian Coggins now and (inset) as a paramedic: 'it's the sort of thing that stays with you for ever'

Simon Ford sees it as a way of countering the gun lobby's argument for a relaxation in the gun laws. "It is important for people to see what the consequences of these weapons were."

PC Jim Wood, whose best mate, PC Roger Brereton, perished in his police car in a blaze of 23 bullets, argues that the 1988 Firearms Amendment Act has "done no bloody good at all". Innocent people are still being killed by powerful illegal weapons. "It's a good time to remind people of that," he says.

Brereton was first on the scene. The police had been alerted by reports that someone was walking around with a gun in South View, a quiet residential cul de sac backing on to Hungerford Common. Nothing unusual about people carrying guns in pheasant country, says Wood. "In Oxford Street, yes, but not in woolly old Berkshire."

When he arrived, another colleague was coming towards him covered in blood and he saw Ryan pumping his friend's car full of bullets. Then Ryan turned and fired at Wood. "My reaction was disbelief and a little bit of terror. I could hear the bullets whizzing past but at the time I was not scared for myself," he says. "It didn't register. You just switch into police mode, work mode. I honestly don't think my ticket came out of the hat that day." Wood had to break the news to Brereton's wife, the worst thing he has ever had to do.

He had no idea of the scale of the disaster, or where he fitted into the puzzle, until the late evening news. The next day, he went into work as usual. "It was my duty – though I hasten to say I didn't do a lot." Eighteen months later, he was being treated for post-traumatic stress syndrome and, when he went back to work, he was on traffic duties. "Not a day goes past when I don't think about what happened. My best buddy was killed. I'm hoping this programme will lay the ghosts to rest."

He believes there is no such thing as being prepared for the unimaginable. "The same could happen again," he says. "West Berkshire is a vast area. The whole killing field was done in 55 minutes."

Adrian Coggins was only 23, a rookie ambulanceman, when Hungerford erupted. The ambulance crew ahead had been shot at but he and his colleague did not receive their message to keep away. The scene was mayhem, he says. He remembers the unusual high-pitched cracking sound of the Kalashnikov and the sight of PC Roger Brereton lying across the front seats of the police car, a radio still spluttering in his hand, the engine running.

He found Ivor Jackson badly wounded, Dorothy Ryan dead and a young girl shot in the legs. "I thought I was gone," says Jackson. "Adrian saved my life."

"It's the sort of thing that stays with you for ever. I wasn't offered any counselling. You just carried on in those days. When I pieced it all together, I couldn't believe it. Nothing happens in Hungerford."

Charles Pollard thinks Britain "grew up" as a result of Hungerford. "The realisation that this could happen in fun-loving England, where we don't have guns and the police aren't armed... it changed policing and it changed society for ever."


The Hungerford Massacre is on BBC1 tonight, at 9pm
 
Sgt Paul Brightwell,was a section and platoon leader of the Thames Valley Police departments,Tactical Firearms Unit-who were the equiverlant of a typical American Swat team.

Brightwell and Ryan’s conversation, which was to last almost an hour and a half, began when the gunman finally confirmed that he had heard the police message that he was surrounded. But the exchange hardly seemed to get off to a promising start.

SERGEANT: What is your first name, Mr Ryan?

RYAN: It is nothing to do with you. Mind your own business.

SERGEANT: That’s OK. I just want to talk to you and get you out safely. Do you understand?

RYAN: Yes, I’ve nothing against you.

SERGEANT: What weapons do you have with you?

RYAN: One 9mm pistol and ammunition.

SERGEANT: Mr Ryan, this is very important. Do not come to the window holding any weapons. Do you understand?

RYAN: I understand. I also have a grenade.

SERGEANT: Do not come to the window with the grenade. Do you understand?

RYAN: Yes.

SERGEANT: What type of grenade is it?

RYAN: Israeli fragmentation type.

SERGEANT: I want to get you out of the building safely.

RYAN: Yes.

SERGEANT: It is important that you do not come to the window with any weapon. Do you understand?

RYAN: Yes.

‘It was a bit of a relief when I was immediately answered,’ Sergeant Brightwell would later reveal. ‘He was actually easy to talk to. The whole enormity of what he had done didn’t dawn upon me at the time. I had met George Noon on the way down though, and seen Douglas Wainwright slumped over his car - so I knew what he had done all right. I just wanted to keep him talking - to get him out of the building, as you can see from my report. I didn’t want him to be shot. That’s the training. Although I’m not a proper police negotiator, we do learn how to negotiate with someone in a building as part of our overall tactical training. I was nervous but not shaking. So at this stage I switched my radio off, in order to be able to concentrate more effectively. Another PC with me was in radio contact and reporting back all the time to Mr Lambert.’

Chief Inspector Lambert, leading the Support Group, had by now moved out of his Portakabin outside Hungerford police station and headed towards the school. Accompanying him on this short journey was a trained police negotiator, expert in psychological tactics and techniques, who had been standing by for some time. But Lambert was soon satisfied that the dialogue between Sergeant Brightwell and Ryan was going well. It was his judgement that no useful purpose could be served by a sudden change of personnel. In fact he was more worried about Ryan’s claim to have a grenade, so he ordered additional police armoury to cover the window of the classroom where the gunman had been seen. As the Chief Inspector continued to monitor the dialogue, he became convinced that Ryan was going to give himself UP.

Just as the head of the Support Group was happy for Sergeant Brightwell to proceed with the negotiations, so the Assistant Chief Constable, Charles Pollard, was content to follow the judgement of his firearms adviser.

‘While I was in overall charge of the police operation, you do have to be able to delegate,’ Charles Pollard would later insist. ‘So I let Paul Brightwell get on with it via Glyn Lambert. Because once I knew that we had the school contained, it became, in some respects, a routine policing matter. We now had the situation under control. It was at this stage that I too went down to the school.’

‘Although the conversation went on for well over an hour,’ Sergeant Brightwell would later explain, ‘it seemed more like five minutes. All the time he was both lucid and calm. There were the odd gaps in the dialogue, but other than that it was almost continuous. On several occasions I really did think that he was going to make a move and come out. I knew precisely how I wanted him to come out, because of the training. But he did keep on asking about his mother.’

Altogether, Ryan would ask the Sergeant about the plight of his mother, Dorothy, well over a dozen times. Indeed it was the central theme of their conversation.

RYAN: I want to know how my mother is. Tell me about my mother.

SERGEANT: I will try to find out about your mother. Just bear with me.

RYAN: I must know about my mother.

SERGEANT: Mr Ryan, do you have any other weapons?

RYAN: I’ve got a.32 CZ pistol but that is in for repair. I must know about my mother. Tell me. I will throw the grenade out of the window.

SERGEANT: Don’t do that. I’m trying to find out.

RYAN: That is ridiculous. You must know. I want to know.

SERGEANT: Mr Ryan, when I tell you to, I want you to stand up and look out of the widow to the front of the school.

RYAN: What for?

SERGEANT: If you stand up, we will know what door you are coming out of.

RYAN: I’m not standing up, Have you found out about my mother yet?

SERGEANT: Not yet, I’m still trying.

RYAN: I’m not coming out until I know.

‘As you can see; Sergeant Brightwell would later explain, ‘he kept on asking about his mother. But I can tell you that she was as dead as a doornail. It seemed to me that by asking about her continuously he was almost trying to let himself off of the hook in some way.

The conversation continued.

SERGEANT: I want you to leave all your weapons in that room. Do you understand?

RYAN: Yes. My pistol is tied to my wrist with a lanyard. I have one round of ammunition.

SERGEANT: Can you undo the lanyard?

RYAN: No.

‘I must say that I was perplexed by this man,’ Ryan’s interlocutor would later admit ‘I just wanted him to do as I was telling him. I still thought that I was going to get him out. It seemed to me as if he wanted to come out. I was shouting because of the distance between us. A couple of times I had to ask him to speak up. But what he said about the gun being tied to his wrist with a lanyard worried me. Because I knew that if he did come out he could easily have been shot, had the gun been misinterpreted, for example. But he still seemed to be happy to talk. He asked about my rank and so on. So we carried on talking.’

SERGEANT: It is important that you come out with no weapons.

RYAN: I had an M1 carbine which I left in the park. It was on a gravel path near the body of a mate I shot near the swimming pool. There should be a thirty-round magazine with it.

SERGEANT: Thank you for that, Mr Ryan.

RYAN: Also, there is my dog. Has anybody found that? It is a black labrador. I shot it. I had my eyes shut the first time and I just winged it. I have undone the lanyard. I also have body armour.

SERGEANT: Thank you. Will you come out?

RYAN: I am not coming out until I know about my mother.

SERGEANT: I am trying to find out. But I want you to come out leaving all your weapons in the room.

RYAN: Where shall I leave them - on the window-sill?

SERGEANT: Don’t come to the window holding any weapon. Just leave them on the floor. Do you understand?

RYAN: Yes.

SERGEANT: Just leave all your weapons in the room and come out.

RYAN: I will come down the stairs outside.

SERGEANT: The stairs with the rifle out in front?

RYAN: Yes, those stairs.

SERGEANT: When you come outside look to the left and you will see me. Do not make any move towards the rifle. I want you to leave your body armour in the room as well, Mr Ryan.

RYA N: Why’s that?

SERGEANT: I need to be able to see you have nothing concealed, that you understand my position.

RYAN: Yes, I understand. I am not going to come out until I know about my mother.

SERGEANT: I am doing my best, Mr Ryan. I am still trying to find out about your mother. If you come out, we will be able to sort it out much quicker.

Sergeant Brightwell later explained: ‘All the time I was trying to play down what he had done. To give him the impression that we could sort everything out - that I was a sort of friend who he could talk to - even though it was obvious that the bloke was completely nuts and needed locking away for the rest of his life. So when he asked about the casualty figures, I again tried to talk the whole thing down.’

RYAN: What are the casualty figures?

SERGEANT: I don’t know. Obviously you know you shot a lot of people.

RYAN: Hungerford must be a bit of a mess.

SERGEANT: You are right. They know you have been through. Do you know how many you have shot?

RYAN: I don’t know. Its like a bad dream.

SERGEANT: It has happened. The sooner you come out, the easier it will be to sort out.

RYAN: I know it’s happened. I’m not stupid.

SERGEANT: I know that, mate.

RYAN: How’s my mother? She’s dead, isn’t she? That’s why you will not tell me. I am throwing the magazine of the pistol out. I still have one round left, though.

SERGEANT: Why do you have that?

RYAN: It is obvious, isn’t it?

SERGEANT: I want to get you out safely. Don’t do anything silly.

RYAN: Don’t worry. I have nothing against you. You have got your job to do.

That afternoon there was another man in Hungerford with a job to do. Sergeant David Warwick, a senior firearms instructor in the Support Group, had Michael Ryan in his telescopic gun sight for a full minute. And yet he chose not to pull the trigger.

‘If I had fired,’ he comments, ‘then I would have been a murderer. I would have been no better than him. He was unlikely to shoot anybody else. Nor was he any longer a threat to the police or the public. It was also extremely unlikely that he was going to abscond or commit other offences. You have got to have the justification before shooting someone and the justification wasn’t there.’

Unaware that Sergeant Warwick’s gun had been trained on him, albeit from outside the school, Ryan continued to ask about his mother.

RYAN: You must have a radio. Get on that and find out. How many people are with you?

SERGEANT: Just a couple.

RYAN: Well, get them to do it. Have you found the M1 carbine yet?

SERGEANT: They are still looking, Mr Ryan. I have passed on all the details.

RYAN: It is just that there were some kids nearby. I don’t want them to find it. And what about my dog? Have you found it? Was it on the Common?

SERGEANT: Is it important?

RYAN: Yes.

SERGEANT: It is at Hungerford police station.

RYAN: Will you look after it?

SERGEANT: Of course we will.

RYAN: Will you give it a decent burial?

SERGEANT: Yes, Mr Ryan. If you come out, you can see the dog yourself.

RYAN: What about my mother? She is dead. I know she is dead. Have you found her yet?

SERGEANT: I am still waiting, Mr Ryan.

RYAN: I have picked up my gun again.

SERGEANT: Don’t do that, Mr Ryan. If you come out I will find out. All you have to do is walk slowly down the stairs with your hands in the air. Have you seen anybody in the school?

R YAN: No. I am on my own. I haven’t any hostages. What time is it?

SERGEANT: It is 6.24.

RYAN: If only the police car hadn’t turned up. If only my car had started.

SERGEANT: Will you come out now please, Mr Ryan?

RYAN: I want to think about it. Why won’t you tell me about my mother?

SERGEANT: I don’t know. As soon as you come out, we’ll find out together.

RYAN: I won’t come out until I know. I did not mean to kill her. It was a mistake.

SERGEANT: I understand that, mate.

RYAN: How can you understand? I wish I had stayed in bed.

SERGEANT: Mr Ryan, just come down. Leave all your weapons in the room and come down.

Within the sixty seconds that Sergeant Warwick’s gun was trained on Ryan, the gunman appeared at the window, apparently unarmed. Warwick wondered if it was perhaps Ryan’s way of asking the police to bring about the end. But still the police marksman refused to shoot. The senior firearms instructor knew very well that if Ryan had appeared at the window with a grenade, or anything remotely resembling a grenade, or indeed if he was holding a hostage, then the police response would have been totally different. But neither of these scenarios materialized.

‘All the talk was that he was going to give himself up,’ Sergeant Warwick would later explain. ‘He was in an empty school, having thrown one weapon out of the window - and I can tell you he wasn’t going anywhere. Pulling the trigger would therefore have been entirely the wrong decision.’

Still unaware that his life had been spared by the highest standards of professional policing on the part of Sergeant Warwick, Ryan began to dwell on the consequences of giving himself up. He asked if he could be taken to London.

RYAN: Will I be treated OK?

SERGEANT: Of course you will, Mr Ryan.

RYAN: Will I go to prison for a long time?

SERGEANT: I don’t know, Mr Ryan. It is not up to me.

RYAN: You must have an idea. I will get life, won’t l?

SERGEANT: I don’t know, Mr Ryan. You will go to prison for a long time.

RYAN: It’s funny. I killed all those people but I haven’t got the guts to blow my own brains out.

SERGEANT: Mr Ryan, just leave all your weapons in the room and do exactly as you are told. Don’t do anything silly. Do you understand?

RYAN: What time is it?

SERGEANT: Six-forty-five. What do you want to know the time for?

RYAN: I want to think about it. I am not coming out until I know about my mother.

SERGEANT: Mr Ryan, I am still trying to find out. If you comedown we will be able to find out together.
There followed several minutes during which time Michael Ryan did not speak. And then, at 6.52pm, Sergeant Brightwell heard a single, muffled shot from the classroom. The gunman, who had not expressed the slightest remorse for any one of his victims, was not to speak again.

‘But that was by no means the end of the matter from our point of view,’ Chief Inspector Lambert would later point out. ‘Had he shot the wall? Would we all get shot if we went in there? I kept an open mind and was determined not to rush it. But I did want to finish it before dark, only a couple of hours away. I thought that there could be a booby trap. We flew a helicopter past the window -but they couldn’t see in. Then someone got up onto the roof. We had a dog in front of us. These are the Tactical Firearms dogs who are used to training with us. So the dog went in first for us to see what the reaction would be. If there was a person in the room the dog would have reacted. The person on the roof was using mirrors on a long pole, and he saw Ryan, who appeared to be dead. I knew that we were almost home. People then went in and saw that he was indeed dead. We then used a technique to make sure that he was not wired for explosives before we touched him - and an explosives officer took over at this point. So the body was tied up and wired up and moved to make sure that there was no booby trap. Then I went into the classroom myself and saw him. My reaction was just one of relief. That it was over.’

When members of the Tactical Firearms Team entered the classroom, they found Ryan’s body slumped in a corner on the floor near a window. His back was against the wall and his 9mm Beretta pistol, hammer still cocked, remained clasped in his right hand, tied to his wrist by a bootlace. A Home Office pathologist would later confirm that Ryan had died from a single gunshot wound to the head. It had passed through his skull, shattering his brain. The bullet wound was 0.7cm at the point of entry and the skin around it blackened and as if tattooed. The bullet had fractured the skull extensively, and its heat had singed the gunman’s hair.

‘I went in with some others,’ Sergeant Brightwell recalls. ‘The doors were barricaded. And there he was, sitting beneath the window, dead. I thought, Oh - so that’s who I’ve been talking to. I didn’t feel sorry for him. I thought that’s more than he would have got if he would have come out. It’s probably as close as you could have got to justice, if you like. It wasn’t a case of brains being splattered everywhere, as you might think. But there was blood all over his face and up the wall. When it was all over I got back to the police station and phoned home. My wife, Sandy, knows not to expect me on time, and she would have known that I would have been involved. Still, she was mightily relieved to hear from me. It was midnight when I got home. The kids were in bed. You just try to play it down a bit. I’m not the hero of Hungerford. Its just that I ended up speaking to him. I was just doing the job I was trained to do. The people of Hungerford were brave - the public and the injured. When I got there, we now know, it was all over. He had shot his last person. In any case, I had a gun and a flak jacket, and I was surrounded by eight blokes. Those who got it had nothing. The local police were unarmed - Roger Brereton and the like. So compared to what some people saw, and to what they still have to deal with, you realize that you got off lightly.’

According to one of the tabloid newspapers, soon after the announcement that Ryan had shot himself, a good number of the townsfolk of Hungerford went wild with delight. It reported that some residents living near to the school ran into the street chanting: ‘The bastard’s dead, the bastard’s dead.’ The paper claimed that children, many of whom had been ordered to hide under their beds while Ryan was on the loose, cycled up and down yelling ‘Good riddance’, while in the pubs of Hungerford, drinkers toasted his death. Hungerford’s mourning had thus still to begin.

Ron Tarry formed a completely different impression as he walked around the town in the wake of the shootings. He explains: ‘I saw people shocked and talking in hushed tones to each other. My impression was that it was largely the press and others who had rushed into the town and were drinking in the pubs. Not one resident toasted Ryan’s death, and there were no signs of rejoicing. What that newspaper reported was totally untrue.

HUNGERFORD.jpg
Michaelryan190.jpg
 
And if any of those adult victims had been "packing," the outcome could have been far different. I know, I know. If my aunt had cajones she'd be my uncle.

One of the reasons schools here were an attractive target for a while was because they're a "gun-free" zone. Imagine that! A criminal makes rational decisions and attacks people he knows are unarmed! Hence over half of your burglaries are "hot" burglaries, with the victims in the house (making it truly a robbery rather than a burglary). Our hot burglaries, by comparison, are only about 14%. For some reason criminals are afraid of getting shot while burglarizing a US home.
 
I think teachers should be able to carry.I also belive parts of the GCA of 1968 should be repaeled for example 18 year olds should be allowed to own handguns,and get permits to carry,If that ever happened they should also be allowed to carry in school.
 
There are though exception to the British handgun laws. Those of historical significance or before a certain year that escapes me right now. For instance I know someone who still legally owns his 1913 dated M1911 and a bunch of similar things. Of course there are a whole bunch of storage laws, but they didn't start cutting up the rare and unique ones at least. They still need to appeal the 1997 law though.

I would be happy to revert back to the old laws where citizens could be armed but the police couldn't, before we had a bunch of morons trying to take over the country for various foreign powers or replacing the government that implemented the bans in the first place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top