Kaylee,
Yeah, I zeroed in on Chapter 4 too. That seems to lay out a sort of Islamic nationalism, but I didn't see one iota of a suggestion that killing non-believers was permissible.
The concluding paragraph also makes explicit that in this Islamic state, belief has to be left up to the individual.
So I agree, this definitely calls for Muslims to establish Islamic states...but you go further and say:
That (and related beliefs, such as declaring all Muslims who weren't equally militant as takfir and thus also free game for the sword) fuels the violence we see from the militant groups.
Where is this? Qutb specifically says that Christians and Jews who follow the moral law are not non-believers. He also specifically says that belief is a matter for individual conscience, not to be enforced by the state.
The interesting thing about the Muslim Brotherhood is that it is the single largest agitator for democracy in both Egypt and Jordan. They are constantly protesting dictatorship and demanding elections in those countries...so again, I'm not seeing the connection to "killing all Muslims who don't agree" either.
Is there maybe something other than Milestones that you got these ideas from you could point me to? Or if the killing piece is in Milestones, I'd like to see where.
Thanks for the response, and I appreciate that you're willing to discuss this in a reasoned and calm fashion.