ETA: I see 124 HST is just barely shy of 12'' in the OP - that small of a difference would not give me concern.
Winchester & Federal don't give gel results for many revolver calibers; so, we will have to go with clear gel for this.
Most would agree the classic full power 357 Mag 125 JHP / SJHP did well on the street.
https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/revolver-ballistics-test/
From a 4'' barrel Remington 125 SJHP 13.6'' / .54
Ranger T 127 +P+ has a good reputation on the street, its performance from a 3.5'' barrel is likely not as good as a 4''+ like Glock 17/19
https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/self-defense-ammo-ballistic-tests/
From a short barrel the bullet didn't reliably expand and over penetrated.
Lets look at manufacturer data.
https://winchesterle.com/-/media/Pr...gun-Bullet-Barrier-Testing-Protocol_2016.ashx
Ranger T 9mm 127 +P+ in bare gel 14.3'' / .68 and in heavy clothed gel 14.4'' / .70
Did any LE agency quit using 357 Sig because it didn't perform well on the street? Don't think so. Same link...
Ranger T 357 Sig 125 bare gel 12.3'' / .63 and in heavy clothed gel 14'' / .68
The other two 357 Sig bullets that would have been in use with LE
http://www.le.vistaoutdoor.com/wound_ballistics/load_comparison/load_comparison.aspx
357 Sig Gold Dot bare gel 14.3'' / .61 and heavy clothing 18.3'' / .53
357 Sig HST bare gel 11'' / .83 and in heavy clothing 12'' / .64
Tie back to my first example with the 357 Sig HST in clear gel.
https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/357-sig-gel-test/
357 Sig HST 18'' / .61
I think its a fair generalization that bullets that performed well on the street penetrate 12'' or more.
Not directed toward OP:
In before the replies of, not a cop so don't need 12'' penetration
and expansion, muh 32 / 380 FMJ is fine for civilian because ...
Yea, you roll with that.