What do you most want to see tested in gelatin?

What should I test next?

  • .38 spl 130 gr PDX1 fired from 2", 4", & 16" bbl

    Votes: 21 30.0%
  • 7.62x39mm S&B 123 gr soft point, 10.5", 16" & 20" bbl

    Votes: 6 8.6%
  • 7.62x39mm 130 gr PDX1, 10.5", 16" & 20" bbl

    Votes: 4 5.7%
  • 7.62x39mm Wolf 154 gr soft point, 10.5", 16" & 20" bbl

    Votes: 11 15.7%
  • .223 Rem Remington 50 gr JHP, 11.5", 16" & 20" bbl

    Votes: 17 24.3%
  • Other, please specify.

    Votes: 21 30.0%

  • Total voters
    70
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

chopinbloc

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,242
Location
sweet home arizona
These are a few of the loads I have on hand. When possible, I'll try to test from multiple barrel lengths.


If you want to see something other than listed, please keep in mind that I mainly try to test loads that are not already well documented. For example, there is little need for me to test 9mm 124 gr +P Gold Dot or .223 Hornady 75 gr TAP because the performance of those loads is very well known. I'm willing to test 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, .357 mag, 10mm, .223, and 7.62x39mm. Possibly 12ga if there is a load that's interesting and not already well documented.
 
Last edited:
I voted for the 154 gr wolf but would also like to see the 50 gr remmington because I though about buying those for defensive purposes. Do you have a Youtube Channel? I enjoy watching Shooting the Bull and TnOutdoors9
 
I've long wanted to see a .357 mag carbine pitted against a .223 carbine at various distances. With some loads, the .357 from a carbine will beat out the .223 in terms of KE. A 125 grain bullet at 2100 f/s is nothing to scoff at.
 
I have actually loaded for this, although it was many years ago. Never shot it on gelatin, but it was a lot of fun on water jugs and watermelons.

They were loaded to a fairly aggressive .357 Mag level
 
155mm Howitzer. No telling what the muzzle energy is on that one.

You'd need a gel block the size of an olympic pool I imagine.
 
I'll second wanting to see .38 wad cutters.....not necessarily hollow bases loaded backwards. Just wad cutters and how they rate for penetration, wound channel generation etc.

VooDoo
 
I voted for the 38 special. There are lots of youtube tests with 2" barrels, but not many with 4".
Whenever I see that you have a new test on youtube, I check it out. Good, no bs tests.
 
Thank you.

There are a few .38spl PDX1 tests out there but they are not very conclusive. I suspect that cold temperature caused low velocity in tnoutdoors9's video. A similar thing happened to me when testing 135 gr Gold Dot. Low temperature, no expansion. Warm temperature, good expansion.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying that isn't a possibility, but it's there any doubt that they will poke a roughly .72 caliber hole a few feet into a target? I'll need a bigger block, though.
 
How about Barnaul 9 mm Makarov 95 gr JHP from a Mak pistol?

How about a Sellier and Bellot 7.62 x 25 tokarev in 85 gr JHP or FMJ out of a TT 33 pistol ? Suppose to be zipping at 1400 ft per sec.
 
I did a Silver Bear 115 gr JHP from a Mak, it's on my channel if you're interested. They don't feed in my Mak. I'll keep my eye out for other 9x18mm JHP.

I don't have anything chambered in 7.62 Tok. My uncle has a Tokarev, though. Next time he's in town, I'll see if I can borrow it.
 
I would love to see a light for caliber .44 Magnum loaded for max velocity fired from a carbine...
 
.32-20 from a handgun. I found ZERO gel tests of the round online, only a single rifle test on a dead cow.
 
Lately I have been wondering about the various pistol FMJ rounds. We all know a good hollow point is hands down the superior self defense round, but what about for those of us on a tight budget and can't afford to pay $1.50 a round for DPX, have FMJ issued at work, or live in a country where FMJ is all that is available through normal channels?

I would like to see side by side comparisons of some of the more common grain weights and styles of FMJ ammo in 9mm, .40 S&W, .38 spl, .357 mag, and .45 acp.

I have looked online and could not find any tests like this.
 
FMJ produces a narrow, deep wound channel, slightly smaller than the diameter of the projectile. Heavier bullets tend to go deeper. If enough people are interested, I can do a test but I feel like the behavior of FMJ is already so widely known that there is little need to test.

In the mean time, here is a test done with Cleargel that ought to give you a rough idea.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top