• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

What do you most want to see tested in gelatin?

What should I test next?

  • .38 spl 130 gr PDX1 fired from 2", 4", & 16" bbl

    Votes: 21 30.0%
  • 7.62x39mm S&B 123 gr soft point, 10.5", 16" & 20" bbl

    Votes: 6 8.6%
  • 7.62x39mm 130 gr PDX1, 10.5", 16" & 20" bbl

    Votes: 4 5.7%
  • 7.62x39mm Wolf 154 gr soft point, 10.5", 16" & 20" bbl

    Votes: 11 15.7%
  • .223 Rem Remington 50 gr JHP, 11.5", 16" & 20" bbl

    Votes: 17 24.3%
  • Other, please specify.

    Votes: 21 30.0%

  • Total voters
    70
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

chopinbloc

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2005
Messages
2,242
Location
sweet home arizona
These are a few of the loads I have on hand. When possible, I'll try to test from multiple barrel lengths.


If you want to see something other than listed, please keep in mind that I mainly try to test loads that are not already well documented. For example, there is little need for me to test 9mm 124 gr +P Gold Dot or .223 Hornady 75 gr TAP because the performance of those loads is very well known. I'm willing to test 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP, .357 mag, 10mm, .223, and 7.62x39mm. Possibly 12ga if there is a load that's interesting and not already well documented.
 
Last edited:
I voted for the 154 gr wolf but would also like to see the 50 gr remmington because I though about buying those for defensive purposes. Do you have a Youtube Channel? I enjoy watching Shooting the Bull and TnOutdoors9
 
I've long wanted to see a .357 mag carbine pitted against a .223 carbine at various distances. With some loads, the .357 from a carbine will beat out the .223 in terms of KE. A 125 grain bullet at 2100 f/s is nothing to scoff at.
 
I have actually loaded for this, although it was many years ago. Never shot it on gelatin, but it was a lot of fun on water jugs and watermelons.

They were loaded to a fairly aggressive .357 Mag level
 
155mm Howitzer. No telling what the muzzle energy is on that one.

You'd need a gel block the size of an olympic pool I imagine.
 
I'll second wanting to see .38 wad cutters.....not necessarily hollow bases loaded backwards. Just wad cutters and how they rate for penetration, wound channel generation etc.

VooDoo
 
I voted for the 38 special. There are lots of youtube tests with 2" barrels, but not many with 4".
Whenever I see that you have a new test on youtube, I check it out. Good, no bs tests.
 
Thank you.

There are a few .38spl PDX1 tests out there but they are not very conclusive. I suspect that cold temperature caused low velocity in tnoutdoors9's video. A similar thing happened to me when testing 135 gr Gold Dot. Low temperature, no expansion. Warm temperature, good expansion.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying that isn't a possibility, but it's there any doubt that they will poke a roughly .72 caliber hole a few feet into a target? I'll need a bigger block, though.
 
How about Barnaul 9 mm Makarov 95 gr JHP from a Mak pistol?

How about a Sellier and Bellot 7.62 x 25 tokarev in 85 gr JHP or FMJ out of a TT 33 pistol ? Suppose to be zipping at 1400 ft per sec.
 
I did a Silver Bear 115 gr JHP from a Mak, it's on my channel if you're interested. They don't feed in my Mak. I'll keep my eye out for other 9x18mm JHP.

I don't have anything chambered in 7.62 Tok. My uncle has a Tokarev, though. Next time he's in town, I'll see if I can borrow it.
 
I would love to see a light for caliber .44 Magnum loaded for max velocity fired from a carbine...
 
.32-20 from a handgun. I found ZERO gel tests of the round online, only a single rifle test on a dead cow.
 
Lately I have been wondering about the various pistol FMJ rounds. We all know a good hollow point is hands down the superior self defense round, but what about for those of us on a tight budget and can't afford to pay $1.50 a round for DPX, have FMJ issued at work, or live in a country where FMJ is all that is available through normal channels?

I would like to see side by side comparisons of some of the more common grain weights and styles of FMJ ammo in 9mm, .40 S&W, .38 spl, .357 mag, and .45 acp.

I have looked online and could not find any tests like this.
 
FMJ produces a narrow, deep wound channel, slightly smaller than the diameter of the projectile. Heavier bullets tend to go deeper. If enough people are interested, I can do a test but I feel like the behavior of FMJ is already so widely known that there is little need to test.

In the mean time, here is a test done with Cleargel that ought to give you a rough idea.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top