What does "pro-gun liberal" mean?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really? Didn't know I lived in such a dense state. Seems a lot emptier in toto than KY, AL, LA, etc In fact it looks like MN is about 21st in density but 4th in not getting that "redistribution" back. I think you are reading in too much to a limited sample. While population density plays a part, so does per capita income, education level of inhabitants, attractiveness of the location to business (often based on the education thing), political clout at the Federal level, and relative ability to balance state budgets


But in reality the point I wanted to make was that redistribution of wealth takes many forms, and all too often people ignore that redistribution when it's in their favor then scream bloody murder when it isn't.

If you want an end to redistribution of wealth can MN get your 23c for every Fed tax dollar redistribution/welfare back? We'd only need another 7c from some other beneficiary of redistribution to be fair then.

After all taxes and wealth distribution is the problem, right?

Or isn't it now?
 
Malone LaVeigh said:
1. Evidence the condition of our rights today, after a half century of this issue being the domain of the Right.

2. I'm seriously considering registering as a Dem and getting active in the party.

1. We've had a couple hundred years of the firemen being in charge of putting out fires, and still buildings burn down. Therefore, I'm advocating putting the arsonists in charge of the fire department.

2. I'm sure the Democrats would welcome your support as a gun owner and embrace your gun rights, right up until the moment they get elected.
 
1.) All topics and posts must be related to firearms or civil liberties issues.
2.) Multiple user registrations are prohibited.
3.) As a family-friendly board, we ask that you keep your language clean. If you wouldn't say it in front of your dear old Grandma, you probably don't want to say it here.
4.) Spamming, trolling, flaming, and personal attacks are prohibited. You can disagree with other members, even vehemently, but it must be done in a well-mannered form. Attack the argument, not the arguer.
5.) We cannot provide a comprehensive list of "Things Not To Say".Posts that are contrary to the above policies, or to the mission of The High Road, may be edited or deleted at our sole discretion. Membership may be revoked if such a step is deemed necessary by us. We're a private venture enabled by an all-volunteer staff. Please treat this venue as a polite discussion in a friend's home and respect the wishes of the hosts.
We have noted that the civility of L&P has been plummeting of late. Correlated with this is yet another resurgence of political posts that do not meet the criteria as outlined in the rules of conduct. Just because a post is 'political' does not mean it belongs here. It must address firearms issues or civil liberties issues directly. "Civil liberties are in danger because Bush lied, people died!" and "we will lose all of our guns becuase Hillary has anger issues!" will not cut it. Post directly, not obliquely, about how a given topic has an impact on RKBA or civil liberties.

Thank you,

Staff at THR
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top