MI2600
Member
No interest in anything not Colt, S&W, or Uberti Schofields. Also, nothing above .45 ca;iber.
I'll go along with that, even though I have an XP (7mm IHMSA) that I bought for shooting silhouettes in IHMSA's "Unlimited" class back in the '80s. After we quit shooting silhouettes, I just put the gun away. I keep it because I'm a sentimental old fool I guess - it's kind of a novelty that I like to show off once in a while. However, I have absolutely no real use for a single shot pistol anymore.Single shot pistols. Like TC’s and the like.
Just to twist a thorn or two, I definitely need more engraved guns in my life.
Nice. Leaves room for the 460 S&W then.No interest in anything not Colt, S&W, or Uberti Schofields. Also, nothing above .45 ca;iber.
It doesn't improve accuracy, handling, comfort or recoil control. What it does improve is my experience when I handle, shoot or hunt with them.Those are beautiful guns, and that’s beautiful engraving. I just don’t see where the guns were improved. That engraving belongs on...I don’t know... maybe a flask or a zippo?
What it does improve is my experience when I handle, shoot or hunt with them.
What are you not interested in?
Not interested in any handgun turned in to a HANDSgun with scopes, lasers, lights, arm braces and finger nail file attachments.
I don't have any need or interest in HANDSguns. I own a rifle.Be my guest and try to shoot some of the harder kicking stuff like the .454, .475 Linebaugh, .500 JRH, .500 Linebaugh, etc. one-handed. And I know you don’t approve of optics on revolvers, but if they improve the hunter’s shot placement, how can that be a bad thing? Rhetorical question, don’t answer.