Jomax:
IMO it seems that folks who get any firearm generally form an opinion pretty quickly.. If the firearm is reliable and accurate for you then you generally praise them forevermore..
On the other hand if you get a lemon, and every manufacturer will produce lemons, some more, some less, you hate them forevermore...
It seems KelTec's are a prime example of that theory.
My personal KelTec P32 and P11 have been excellent.. No trips back to Cocoa, both are accurate and reliable.. Therefore I'm on the KelTec fan bandwagon.. In fact I'm waiting now to buy a PF-9 when I can find one.
I know the first generation P3AT's were problematic, and I think there are lots of anti-KelTec'ers out there whose opinions were indeed formed by the "iffy" early P3AT's. I hear the 2nd gen P3AT's are excellent.
Another thing, I think the smaller, lighter & larger caliber a pistol is the more it is prone to "limpwristing".. I don't mean you were guilty of that, just that some KelTec detractors probably had problems because of that. You can't blame the pistol for a user problem.
I had my NAA Guardian 32 before my KT P32, and it DID have to be sent back to the factory for help.. NAA Customer Service was excellent, and the little (heavy) Guardian hasn't missed a beat since.. I think the NAA Guardian is an excellent little pistol, but truthfully I find myself cc the KelTec because it is so much lighter.
I don't think anyone has a problem with someone offering their personal opinion of the different firearms in general.. I do hate it when someone absolute hates one gun or another and trolls every firearm forum on the net posting their venom.. (KQ & Fowler come to mind).
You didn't do that, and I respect your opinion. I'm the same way about Berettas as the TomCat I had was pure merde, and customer service equally poor..
I know legions of folks love Beretta's and my opinion is simply just one opinion..
Best Wishes,
J. Pomeroy