Superlite27
Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2007
- Messages
- 712
...and the Brady folks say we're heartless criminals.
I have always went to the range, fired my weapons, packed up, and went home. A while back, I was at a range and noticed two guys in the booth next to me who were taking turns shooting a .38 snubbie. While firing, I could overhear one instucting the other. Striking up a conversation, I learned that one had never fired a gun before, and his friend was taking him shooting for the first time. They only had one box of ammo, and one gun. So I pulled a couple of my .45's, and a couple of revolvers out of my bag, layed them out on the bench with a box of ammo each, and offered to let them fire more than just their one gun. The gleam you see in a child's eyes on a Christmas morning filled their eyes! Neither had ever fired an automatic, so I instructed them on how to load and fire my 1911's safely.
Not only was it fun for them, it was also an enjoyable experience for me. The "warm fuzzy feeling" I received was far more valuable than the price of the ammo they burned up. Now, whenever I go to the range, instead of just minding my own business and doing my own thing, I keep an eye out for others who might relish the experience of trying out something new.
I have noticed there are that 1% who are the stereotypical "obnoxious range loudmouths", but the far higher majority are just plain good people. How can the anti-gunners continue to blatantly misrepresent the 99% of the firearms community that I have found to be the finest example of responsible, caring citizens?
The idea that "they" want to take away our guns, while outrageous, isn't the greatest travesty. It's the fact that they smear the reputation of gun owners as "irresponsible, uncaring, gun nuts" when the complete opposite is the case.
I have always went to the range, fired my weapons, packed up, and went home. A while back, I was at a range and noticed two guys in the booth next to me who were taking turns shooting a .38 snubbie. While firing, I could overhear one instucting the other. Striking up a conversation, I learned that one had never fired a gun before, and his friend was taking him shooting for the first time. They only had one box of ammo, and one gun. So I pulled a couple of my .45's, and a couple of revolvers out of my bag, layed them out on the bench with a box of ammo each, and offered to let them fire more than just their one gun. The gleam you see in a child's eyes on a Christmas morning filled their eyes! Neither had ever fired an automatic, so I instructed them on how to load and fire my 1911's safely.
Not only was it fun for them, it was also an enjoyable experience for me. The "warm fuzzy feeling" I received was far more valuable than the price of the ammo they burned up. Now, whenever I go to the range, instead of just minding my own business and doing my own thing, I keep an eye out for others who might relish the experience of trying out something new.
I have noticed there are that 1% who are the stereotypical "obnoxious range loudmouths", but the far higher majority are just plain good people. How can the anti-gunners continue to blatantly misrepresent the 99% of the firearms community that I have found to be the finest example of responsible, caring citizens?
The idea that "they" want to take away our guns, while outrageous, isn't the greatest travesty. It's the fact that they smear the reputation of gun owners as "irresponsible, uncaring, gun nuts" when the complete opposite is the case.